No, I was correcting you after you missed what I was getting at -kalm wrote:They are not. He’s corrupt too. So in light of this particular discussion, you’re chosen battle is over Biden v. Pizzagate?CID1990 wrote:
Try to keep up, klam
I’m not connecting the two. I’m saying Hunter Biden’s activities are not Pizzagate
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You should probably stay away from “theories” Reeek - your track record is poorSkjellyfetti wrote:Rudy Guiliani was trawling around Europe trying to find evidence that Hunter Biden worked for Burisma? Really? Didn't think that was in dispute. Is it possible that you're oversimplifying the Hunter Biden theory?
the only reason there's a clown show is because the Republicans want one. If they didn't they'd testify under oath and put this charade to a rest.Gil Dobie wrote:Let's get law enforcement involved then, not the clown show that congress is putting on.kalm wrote:
Law enforcement should be based on expediency and cost?
Ummm you do realize that Giuliani snuffing out the Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine was literally the official story, right?CID1990 wrote:You should probably stay away from “theories” Reeek - your track record is poorSkjellyfetti wrote:Rudy Guiliani was trawling around Europe trying to find evidence that Hunter Biden worked for Burisma? Really? Didn't think that was in dispute. Is it possible that you're oversimplifying the Hunter Biden theory?
Also - none of what you said has anything remotely to do with what I said
My very simple point (which you and klam failed to grasp) is that Hunter Biden’s previous employment is a fact, not a conspiracy theory
Pizzagate is a conspiracy theory. Lumping them together is either an exercise in stupidity or partisan willful blindness
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who the hell said anything about Giuliani?kalm wrote:Ummm you do realize that Giuliani snuffing out the Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine was literally the official story, right?CID1990 wrote:
You should probably stay away from “theories” Reeek - your track record is poor
Also - none of what you said has anything remotely to do with what I said
My very simple point (which you and klam failed to grasp) is that Hunter Biden’s previous employment is a fact, not a conspiracy theory
Pizzagate is a conspiracy theory. Lumping them together is either an exercise in stupidity or partisan willful blindness
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Gotcha. You're right.CID1990 wrote:Who the hell said anything about Giuliani?kalm wrote:
Ummm you do realize that Giuliani snuffing out the Biden’s corruption in the Ukraine was literally the official story, right?
Why don’t you and Reeekie go back and look at what I was responding to. MJ listed them together as somehow being equivalent in terms of credibility. They are not
Jesus titties christ you guys are dense
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree. As long as it's good for him, it's true.mainejeff2 wrote:The truthy stuff is only the stuff that Donald J. Trump's says is the truthy stuff.
The Trump ConspiracyUNI88 wrote:They're not Pizzagate and if you separate them the Biden Legacy will get buried by them Dems and never see the light of day. They're marginally related and why not pursue both at the same time?CID1990 wrote:
Try to keep up, klam
I’m not connecting the two. I’m saying Hunter Biden’s activities are not Pizzagate
I think Reek’s rubbing off on you, might want to get that checked
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can we start giving all of these conspiracy theories titles based on Robert Ludlum books?
The Epstein Weekendhoundawg wrote:The Trump ConspiracyUNI88 wrote:
They're not Pizzagate and if you separate them the Biden Legacy will get buried by them Dems and never see the light of day. They're marginally related and why not pursue both at the same time?
Can we start giving all of these conspiracy theories titles based on Robert Ludlum books?
The Obama Deflection
The Yung Poon Affairkalm wrote:The Epstein Weekendhoundawg wrote:
The Trump Conspiracy
The Obama Deflection
Ageist, racist, sexist...bigot.mainejeff2 wrote:Just get this damn election with 2 old straight white men over with!
Yes they are...which shouldn’t matter to an open minded liberal person. If someone made a similar comment regarding young, gay, black, women wouldn’t it be considered bigoted?mainejeff2 wrote:Ok.....just get this election with 2 young lesbian women of color over with!kalm wrote:
Ageist, racist, sexist...bigot.
(We’ve talked about this before Jeff)
Is that better?
Just calling a spade, a spade. Are Trump & Biden not 70-something (ie. "old"), heterosexual (ie. "straight"), caucasian (ie. "white"), men (ie. not women)......?????
Was watching CNN last night and a woman was being asked about her analysis of the debate. She said "It was a good night for the women". I was thinking that if you substituted "women" with blacks, hispanics, asians, gays, old men, etc., it wouldn't be acceptable. Why does "women" get a pass?kalm wrote:Yes they are...which shouldn’t matter to an open minded liberal person. If someone made a similar comment regarding young, gay, black, women wouldn’t it be considered bigoted?mainejeff2 wrote:
Ok.....just get this election with 2 young lesbian women of color over with!
Is that better?
Just calling a spade, a spade. Are Trump & Biden not 70-something (ie. "old"), heterosexual (ie. "straight"), caucasian (ie. "white"), men (ie. not women)......?????
You have to admit, it's funny that the Democrats, the kings of Identity Politics, are chastising themselves for having a lack of diversity.mainejeff2 wrote:Just get this damn election with 2 old straight white men over with!
I didn't say you were and i'm not bent out of shape over anything. It's not all about you, Jeff.mainejeff2 wrote:I am not chastising anyone (???). I am simply pointing out the sham process that is the Dem nomination process.....it is for optics only. We all know who the nominee will be.......an old straight white man......just like Donald Trump. I'm not sure why you are so bent out of shape more me pointing the obvious out?Ibanez wrote:You have to admit, it's funny that the Democrats, the kings of Identity Politics, are chastising themselves for having a lack of diversity.
That's exactly what we need. Someone with a jealous, emotional streak, who complains loudly, that will self-destruct, running the country.mainejeff2 wrote:The funny thing about women is that they complain the loudest......but never back it up on Election Day. Why is that? I'll tell you why......because women HATE other women! Seriously. They can be such petty jealous and emotional creatures.....and they almost always self-destruct.CAA Flagship wrote: Was watching CNN last night and a woman was being asked about her analysis of the debate. She said "It was a good night for the women". I was thinking that if you substituted "women" with blacks, hispanics, asians, gays, old men, etc., it wouldn't be acceptable. Why does "women" get a pass?
And no, I am NOT a woman!
AZGrizFan wrote:That's exactly what we need. Someone with a jealous, emotional streak, who complains loudly, that will self-destruct, running the country.mainejeff2 wrote:
The funny thing about women is that they complain the loudest......but never back it up on Election Day. Why is that? I'll tell you why......because women HATE other women! Seriously. They can be such petty jealous and emotional creatures.....and they almost always self-destruct.
And no, I am NOT a woman!
Great idea.
Oh...…..
Wait a minute.....
Wrong again, Jeff.mainejeff2 wrote:You were/are in a tizzy over the "old straight white men" comment. Are they not?Ibanez wrote: I didn't say you were and i'm not bent out of shape over anything. It's not all about you, Jeff.
The roundtable on CNN this morning was in a tizzy.
They were not pleased that the only person of color in the debate was a man.
AZGrizFan wrote:That's exactly what we need. Someone with a jealous, emotional streak, who complains loudly, that will self-destruct, running the country.mainejeff2 wrote:
The funny thing about women is that they complain the loudest......but never back it up on Election Day. Why is that? I'll tell you why......because women HATE other women! Seriously. They can be such petty jealous and emotional creatures.....and they almost always self-destruct.
And no, I am NOT a woman!
Great idea.
Oh...…..
Wait a minute.....
Yup. Been there, done that. They are old crooked white men.mainejeff2 wrote:So they are not old straight white men?Ibanez wrote: Wrong again, Jeff.
HI54UNI wrote:Bernie Sanders
@BernieSanders
Here’s a prediction: we are going to win, pass a Green New Deal, and criminally prosecute the fossil fuel executives who destroyed the planet.
Only those who have never relied on fossil fuels in their lives can bring suit.houndawg wrote:HI54UNI wrote:Bernie Sanders
@BernieSanders
Here’s a prediction: we are going to win, pass a Green New Deal, and criminally prosecute the fossil fuel executives who destroyed the planet.
You gotta admit that it is a pleasant thing to contemplate though
