2020 Democratic Nomination Process Mega-thread

Post by **CAA Flagship** » Fri Mar 06, 2020 7:04 pm

AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 10:59 am
Well by God he was pretty certain he was right!! Lol

It's really incredible. But "the world equally distributes talent" according to the SNHU commercial.

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Sat Mar 07, 2020 8:29 am

JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 6:44 pm
SDHornet wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 10:05 am These people vote...probably for donks...

...it's why I'm surprised Bernie's free shit didn't appeal to more folks on Super Tuesday. They can't comprehend these types of costs on a budget/taxes.
Do you know who votes for Donks? A solid majority of the most educated people in the population. Post graduate education people voted by 58% to 37% for Clinton over Trump in 2016 and by 65% to 34% for Democrats over Republicans in the 2018 House elections.

The "people who vote for Democrats are stupid" thing just doesn't work. The cognitive elite in this country vote Democrat. I'm using education as a proxy for IQ. But I am confident that if only, say, the top 15% of the intelligence distribution in this country could vote the Republicans would be completely screwed. The Democrats would chronically control both houses of Congress by overwhelming majorities as well as the Presidency.

I am confident that if only, say, the bottom 15% of the intelligence distribution in this country could vote, the Republicans would be completely screwed. The Democrats would chronically control both houses of Congress by overwhelming majorities as well as the Presidency.

Post by **93henfan** » Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:51 am

Carmelo endorses Biden.

Post by **kalm** » Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:55 am

93henfan wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:51 am Carmelo endorses Biden.

Yay!!!!!!!!!

Post by **Ivytalk** » Sun Mar 08, 2020 9:25 am

93henfan wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:51 am Carmelo endorses Biden.

Those AA endorsements are piling up!

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Sun Mar 08, 2020 4:08 pm

Mark -

Link to how Russian meddling in 2016 was successful in terms of swaying votes away from Trump to Clinton?

I’ve been keeping an eye out for research or credible articles on that very subject since 2016 and haven’t seen anything

All I have seen up until now is that nobody knows or can measure Russian success in that context - only that historically the opposite has been true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **Ibanez** » Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:09 pm

CID1990 wrote:Mark -

Link to how Russian meddling in 2016 was successful in terms of swaying votes away from Trump to Clinton?

I’ve been keeping an eye out for research or credible articles on that very subject since 2016 and haven’t seen anything

All I have seen up until now is that nobody knows or can measure Russian success in that context - only that historically the opposite has been true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Eric - if you have paid attention you’d know that I’ve said countless times that proof of such is impossible. It’s impossible to measure. I said they duped Americans. Russian trolls gave false news/info which was spread.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

mainejeff · Post by **mainejeff** » Sun Mar 08, 2020 6:10 pm

CID1990 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 4:08 pm Mark -

Link to how Russian meddling in 2016 was successful in terms of swaying votes away from Trump to Clinton?

I’ve been keeping an eye out for research or credible articles on that very subject since 2016 and haven’t seen anything

All I have seen up until now is that nobody knows or can measure Russian success in that context - only that historically the opposite has been true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

There are no credible sources during the Trump Era.

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:19 pm

Ibanez wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:09 pm
CID1990 wrote:Mark -

Link to how Russian meddling in 2016 was successful in terms of swaying votes away from Trump to Clinton?

I’ve been keeping an eye out for research or credible articles on that very subject since 2016 and haven’t seen anything

All I have seen up until now is that nobody knows or can measure Russian success in that context - only that historically the opposite has been true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Eric - if you have paid attention you’d know that I’ve said countless times that proof of such is impossible. It’s impossible to measure. I said they duped Americans. Russian trolls gave false news/info which was spread.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*Erik

I only named you since my quote function works about half the time since the reset

You did say "duped Americans" - but duped them into doing what? Posting stupid shit on Facebooks?

The IC and the administration have acknowledged that the Russians interfered in the last election, have been doing so in previous elections, and will do so for the foreseeable future. But they "duped Americans" is not exactly the metric those entities have used when acknowledging Russian interference.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:37 am

JohnStOnge wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 5:22 pm
SDHornet wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 11:06 am Wasn't sure if this belongs here, or in jellybellys Russia hoax thread, meh, I'll put it here:

And BTW it wasn't some random Russian trolls. Per the Mueller report it was Russian government entities including a Russian intelligence service. It was a sophisticated effort. Again: In spite of Trump's exaggerations 2016 was an extremely close election. The margins were very thin. VERY possible that even a small degree of suppression would make a difference.

we have an entire agency that changes proples governments for them.

houndawg · Post by **houndawg** » Mon Mar 09, 2020 2:45 am

Ibanez wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 9:39 am I don't know if it's true but someone said that the amount of money Bloomberg spent on his Quixotic campaign is essentially the interest on his principle investments.

Did I explain that right?

Principal

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:08 am

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **kalm** » Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:47 am

CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:08 am

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s fucking awesome!

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:54 am

kalm wrote:
CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:08 am

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s fucking awesome!

Its true too...

look at the full court press they put on Bernie... they came at him from all directions, with carefully measured condemnations of his brand of socialism... making literal conservative arguments about how fiscal math just doesn’t support unicorns...along with coordinated media backup

The Dems have never been more on message than they were about Bernie

Then they turn to Trump and all of a sudden its ARMAGEDDON WE MUST THWART DISASTER WITH TRANSTESTICLES, NAZI HUNTERS AND LETS THROW THE BORDERS OPEN WIDE BECAUSE NAZIS ALSO SODOMY

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Post by **kalm** » Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:12 am

CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:54 am
kalm wrote:
That’s fucking awesome!
Its true too...

look at the full court press they put on Bernie... they came at him from all directions, with carefully measured condemnations of his brand of socialism... making literal conservative arguments about how fiscal math just doesn’t support unicorns...along with coordinated media backup

The Dems have never been more on message than they were about Bernie

Then they turn to Trump and all of a sudden its ARMAGEDDON WE MUST THWART DISASTER WITH TRANSTESTICLES, NAZI HUNTERS AND LETS THROW THE BORDERS OPEN WIDE BECAUSE NAZIS ALSO SODOMY

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You’re on a roll!

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:03 am

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... un-dispute

Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated and profanity-laced argument with an autoworker Tuesday while touring a factory in Detroit, after the individual accused the Democratic presidential candidate of trying to take away his Second Amendment rights.

"You’re full of sh-- ... I support the Second Amendment," Biden shot back, stressing he's not going to take guns away.

The worker then told Biden, "You're working for me, man," and told Biden that he saw an online video supporting his claim that Biden is hostile to the Second Amendment.

OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.

89Hen · Post by **89Hen** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:43 am

Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:03 am https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... un-dispute

Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated and profanity-laced argument with an autoworker Tuesday while touring a factory in Detroit, after the individual accused the Democratic presidential candidate of trying to take away his Second Amendment rights.

"You’re full of sh-- ... I support the Second Amendment," Biden shot back, stressing he's not going to take guns away.

The worker then told Biden, "You're working for me, man," and told Biden that he saw an online video supporting his claim that Biden is hostile to the Second Amendment.
OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.

So Trump is the measuring stick? I thought the left was supposed to be better than he.

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 11:48 am

89Hen wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:43 am
Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:03 am https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... un-dispute

OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.
So Trump is the measuring stick? I thought the left was supposed to be better than he.

I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.

ALPHAGRIZ1 · Post by **ALPHAGRIZ1** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 12:09 pm

There is no hypocrisy when only one "news" outlet is reporting this.

The other 20 are busy explaining to their stupid readers how it was "a human moment" and its no big deal.

20>1 oh the horror

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 12:25 pm

Ibanez wrote: ↑Tue Mar 10, 2020 10:03 am https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden- ... un-dispute

Former Vice President Joe Biden got into a heated and profanity-laced argument with an autoworker Tuesday while touring a factory in Detroit, after the individual accused the Democratic presidential candidate of trying to take away his Second Amendment rights.

"You’re full of sh-- ... I support the Second Amendment," Biden shot back, stressing he's not going to take guns away.

The worker then told Biden, "You're working for me, man," and told Biden that he saw an online video supporting his claim that Biden is hostile to the Second Amendment.
OOH THE HORROR! The hypocrisy from Fox is incredible. I don't recall them pearl clutching when Trump has said a naughty, dirty, filthy word. Or made fun of a handicapped person. Or POWs. Or mocked a dead man.

Yeah, because Fox News is the only one reporting this.

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 12:45 pm

I thought the other networks we're in the tank for the DNC establishment frontrunner. Are you suggesting that's not the case?

CID1990 · Post by **CID1990** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 4:41 pm

I like how Biden floats Beto as a possible Guns Czar and then comes unhinged when his support for the 2A is questioned

This election is going to be a battle of the wits I tell you

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 5:07 pm

Up today 6 states:
Primaries:
Idaho
Michigan
Mississippi
Missouri
Washington
Caucus
North Dakota

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 5:10 pm

Biden declared the winner of Mississippi and Missouri as soon as the polls close.

Skjellyfetti · Post by **Skjellyfetti** » Tue Mar 10, 2020 5:53 pm

Biden looks like he could steal Michigan... if so, it's ovah.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums