The Official "Making America Great Again" Thread

[SDHornet]

12 FBI informants. At one point, everyone bailed and it was FBI informants actively setting up meetings and recruiting people to turn out. FBI trained, funded, organized, and encouraged the kidnapping that attracted the handful of nutjobs it did.

That sounds just like something a child would do when they break something. Put it back together as best you can, and then when your brother touches it and it falls apart, place the blame on them.

You can tell that happened in our household growing up.

[SeattleGriz]

That sounds just like something a child would do when they break something. Put it back together as best you can, and then when your brother touches it and it falls apart, place the blame on them.

You can tell that happened in our household growing up.

I saw a headline on this. The whole thing seems to be getting worse with every tidbit.

[houndawg]

Sounds kind of like vaccine passports.

They just need to make vax passports required for voting so we can see everyone's collective heads explode.

Lowest red state turnout ever.

[houndawg]

Question: If 50% of the country is vaccinated (and 70+% of the “at risk” crowd), shouldn’t PEAK hospitalizations reach no more than 50% of what they were before? And if that is the case, then there shouldn’t be a problem, should there?

More fear porn being peddled by the fear mongers.

It depends on who’s getting it and mutations. 50% of 330 million is still a big number, big enough to strain resources. There’s also some recent noise regarding even newer variants.

I’m friends with a Nicholls State fan who’s a hard core Trumper but now is posting daily pleading for folks to get vaccinated and questioning why their school district is sending kids back to school.

But perhaps it’s still just the flu?

Because the wrong people don't make money if mom or dad can't punch the time clock because somebody has to watch little Johnny?

[houndawg]

Yes, 88 - I do

It would be close though ...

Therein lies the danger for both parties -

DeSantis or Hogan would landslide Harris. It would be quite ugly

Trump would scrape past her and then we’d get tied up in the Felchyfetty Russian Collusion Thread Part II

But Trump running again would in fact be a risk - heis the only one that Harris would get close to in the general election. Anu other candidate would clean her clock


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't count Rafael Cruz out yet

[Baldy]

They just need to make vax passports required for voting so we can see everyone's collective heads explode.

Lowest red state turnout ever.

Someone needs a lesson in demographics.

[SDHornet]

FBI doesn't want to risk acknowledging other Michigan type of setups, or what role they played in the Jan 6 riot.

[BDKJMU]

Trump rally on now. Trump just going off on Demented Joe.

[Ibanez]

Trump rally on now. Trump just going off on Demented Joe.

Big News: Crazy, demented old fart complains. Nothing new there...

[houndawg]

FBI doesn't want to risk acknowledging other Michigan type of setups, or what role they played in the Jan 6 riot.

DHS says they think there is evidence of coordination.

Try to keep up.

[houndawg]

Trump rally on now. Trump just going off on Demented Joe.

Big News: Crazy, demented old fart complains. Nothing new there...

He's still butthurt about losing by 7,000,000 votes. Its the kind of thing that will bug him for the rest of his life.

[GannonFan]

Big News: Crazy, demented old fart complains. Nothing new there...

He's still butthurt about losing by 7,000,000 votes. Its the kind of thing that will bug him for the rest of his life.

Eh, considering how old and how doddering both him and Biden are, that won't be that long of a time.

[SDHornet]

FBI doesn't want to risk acknowledging other Michigan type of setups, or what role they played in the Jan 6 riot.

DHS says they think there is evidence of coordination.

Try to keep up.

How many Jan 6 rioters have been charged with insurrection? I'll wait.

[houndawg]

DHS says they think there is evidence of coordination.

Try to keep up.

How many Jan 6 rioters have been charged with insurrection? I'll wait.

We won't know until the traitors have all been brought to justice - the FBI still pulling them in daily with the help of concerned citizens that Back the Blue and it appears that its going to take a considerable amount of time....... tick tock

[BDKJMU]

How many Jan 6 rioters have been charged with insurrection? I'll wait.

We won't know until the traitors have all been brought to justice - the FBI still pulling them in daily with the help of concerned citizens that Back the Blue and it appears that its going to take a considerable amount of time....... tick tock

The answer is ZERO will be charged with ‘insurrection’ because there was no insurrection..

[houndawg]

We won't know until the traitors have all been brought to justice - the FBI still pulling them in daily with the help of concerned citizens that Back the Blue and it appears that its going to take a considerable amount of time....... tick tock

The answer is ZERO will be charged with ‘insurrection’ because there was no insurrection..

By their own admission they were there to hang Mike Pence.

[SDHornet]

We won't know until the traitors have all been brought to justice - the FBI still pulling them in daily with the help of concerned citizens that Back the Blue and it appears that its going to take a considerable amount of time....... tick tock

The answer is ZERO will be charged with ‘insurrection’ because there was no insurrection..

Aw...I was going to let houndie dance around a bit longer. He's always good for a

[kalm]

The “Justice for J6” rally has a snappy ring to it.

Members of Congress and law enforcement are bracing for potential security threats on Sept. 18 when a "Justice for J6" rally is planned to support the more than 570 people charged with crimes related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

The Capitol Police are expected to present their security plan to the Capitol Police Board this week, according to a congressional source, while the Metropolitan Police Department is also expected to ramp up its presence for the planned rally near the Capitol's west front.

The group organizing the rally, Look Ahead America, is led by Matt Braynard, who served as a campaign staffer for former President Trump. About 300 to 500 attendees are expected at the event, including members of far-right extremist groups such as the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, according to multiple reports

https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.co ... -mob%3famp

[BDKJMU]

Trump rally on in Iowa now (CSPAN, Newsmax, OAN)..

[CID1990]

WSJ article ..

“If Trump Wins in 2024, Then Who Threatens Democracy?”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-win- ... 1633727345

The WSJ article is behind a paywall but HotAir has the salient part:

“At least Republicans can be found who deplore Mr. Trump’s postelection antics; on paper, a possibility exists that one could be nominated to office. No such possibility exists on the Democratic side, for an obvious reason: To criticize the collusion hoax would be to cut oneself off from the institutional gravy train of the entire Democratic and media establishment, since all are implicated, with the exception of a handful of left-wing reporters who are dismissed as cranks for seeing what’s in front of their eyes.

Remember, it was Stacey Abrams, not Donald Trump, who invented a successful modern career model by rejecting the legitimacy of her election defeat. Mr. Kagan’s blind spot is how our national establishment disempowered itself as an upholder of the constitutional and democratic “norms” he now calls on it to defend. What the public sees is liars and frauds in every direction. More alarming, to a certain part of the public, Mr. Trump appears as one man doing his lying and fraudulence in the face of the lying and fraudulence of a near-monolithic establishment. Indeed, a disturbing historical question might cross the minds of those remaining Americans who haven’t yet lost theirs. Is it worse to have a leader whose lies and conspiracy theories are refuted by the entirety of the establishment? Or is it worse to have one whose lies and conspiracy theories the establishment reflexively adopts and echoes?”

https://hotair.com/headlines/2021/10/09 ... cy-n421286


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gil Dobie]

Despite the comic strip playing out in DC, and the clowns that have occupied the White House the last 25 years, we still have the best place in the world to live.

[kalm]

WSJ article ..

“If Trump Wins in 2024, Then Who Threatens Democracy?”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-win- ... 1633727345

The WSJ article is behind a paywall but HotAir has the salient part:

“At least Republicans can be found who deplore Mr. Trump’s postelection antics; on paper, a possibility exists that one could be nominated to office. No such possibility exists on the Democratic side, for an obvious reason: To criticize the collusion hoax would be to cut oneself off from the institutional gravy train of the entire Democratic and media establishment, since all are implicated, with the exception of a handful of left-wing reporters who are dismissed as cranks for seeing what’s in front of their eyes.

Remember, it was Stacey Abrams, not Donald Trump, who invented a successful modern career model by rejecting the legitimacy of her election defeat. Mr. Kagan’s blind spot is how our national establishment disempowered itself as an upholder of the constitutional and democratic “norms” he now calls on it to defend. What the public sees is liars and frauds in every direction. More alarming, to a certain part of the public, Mr. Trump appears as one man doing his lying and fraudulence in the face of the lying and fraudulence of a near-monolithic establishment. Indeed, a disturbing historical question might cross the minds of those remaining Americans who haven’t yet lost theirs. Is it worse to have a leader whose lies and conspiracy theories are refuted by the entirety of the establishment? Or is it worse to have one whose lies and conspiracy theories the establishment reflexively adopts and echoes?”

https://hotair.com/headlines/2021/10/09 ... cy-n421286


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fair question. You go first.

[CID1990]

WSJ article ..

“If Trump Wins in 2024, Then Who Threatens Democracy?”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-win- ... 1633727345

The WSJ article is behind a paywall but HotAir has the salient part:

“At least Republicans can be found who deplore Mr. Trump’s postelection antics; on paper, a possibility exists that one could be nominated to office. No such possibility exists on the Democratic side, for an obvious reason: To criticize the collusion hoax would be to cut oneself off from the institutional gravy train of the entire Democratic and media establishment, since all are implicated, with the exception of a handful of left-wing reporters who are dismissed as cranks for seeing what’s in front of their eyes.

Remember, it was Stacey Abrams, not Donald Trump, who invented a successful modern career model by rejecting the legitimacy of her election defeat. Mr. Kagan’s blind spot is how our national establishment disempowered itself as an upholder of the constitutional and democratic “norms” he now calls on it to defend. What the public sees is liars and frauds in every direction. More alarming, to a certain part of the public, Mr. Trump appears as one man doing his lying and fraudulence in the face of the lying and fraudulence of a near-monolithic establishment. Indeed, a disturbing historical question might cross the minds of those remaining Americans who haven’t yet lost theirs. Is it worse to have a leader whose lies and conspiracy theories are refuted by the entirety of the establishment? Or is it worse to have one whose lies and conspiracy theories the establishment reflexively adopts and echoes?”

https://hotair.com/headlines/2021/10/09 ... cy-n421286


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fair question. You go first.

Well, if Trump were to win in 2024, and if there was not another manufactured scandal suggesting that Trump’s win was illegitimate, then the answer will be “nobody.”

Let’s not forget who impeached whom behind a Clinton-organized lie, even bigger than the “Obama isn’t eligible because he was foreign born” Clinton-organized lie.

Ironic that Trump himself became the principal cheerleader behind that second one, isn’t it?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JohnStOnge]

Trump rally on now. Trump just going off on Demented Joe.

Joe is clearly less demented, if he is demented at all, than Trump is.

[JohnStOnge]

The answer is ZERO will be charged with ‘insurrection’ because there was no insurrection..

By their own admission they were there to hang Mike Pence.

The definition of "insurrection" was clearly met. Google it. This is yet another example of the problem we have with the "conservative" side I was on for most of my life. Just total denial of reality in today's context. Just completely off the rails.

I am still conservative in terms of what a conservative is philosophically. But what's going on with people who call themselves "conservative" nowadays with the denial of reality is really bad.