Well, when this thing started you thought they'd be pretty well crushed at this point
You gotta admit they're hanging on pretty damn well despite overwhelming odds.


I guess "savvy" Putin sent in his "B" team. Genius.
Well, when this thing started you thought they'd be pretty well crushed at this point
Yep. I thought Russia would have rolled them. Good on the Ukrainians. I hope they can hold out for the long run.Skjellyfetti wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:15 pmWell, when this thing started you thought they'd be pretty well crushed at this point
You gotta admit they're hanging on pretty damn well despite overwhelming odds.![]()
![]()
This is the correct answer, not SDs deflecting to Biden.
This is the correct answer, not SDs deflecting to Biden.
Had that thought last night. Why hasn't Seal Team 6 or MOSSAD been sent in a team to kill him. Seems we can "easily" do that with drones
Hard to know who would come next to fill the void. People thought Yeltsin was ineffective and incompetent, but then we ended up getting Putin at some point. I'm not saying that getting rid of Putin would be a bad thing, he's clearly maniacal, just saying that even with getting rid of Putin it doesn't mean it will be all rainbows and puppies with Russia.
Hey, things went crappily for Russia when they went to war back in 1914 and all and we ended up with the Russian Revolution. Other than having nukes, a bunch of tanks, and tens of thousands of miles of battlefield, Russia has never been known as a crack and effective military force. And they're not really all that far from tsarist rule, even after all these years. Throw in the idea that the common soldier doesn't feel a real strong desire to give up his life to subdue a Ukraine that doesn't look all that much different from where they come from - I don't see an overwhelming, swift victory for Russia here.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 7:15 am This is not going well for Russia.
Economy is crashing fast, oligarch yacht mechanics are sabotaging their employers ships, and preliminary reports of Russian casualties are surprising.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... ZybzF2lGpU
![]()
GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 7:39 amHey, things went crappily for Russia when they went to war back in 1914 and all and we ended up with the Russian Revolution. Other than having nukes, a bunch of tanks, and tens of thousands of miles of battlefield, Russia has never been known as a crack and effective military force. And they're not really all that far from tsarist rule, even after all these years. Throw in the idea that the common soldier doesn't feel a real strong desire to give up his life to subdue a Ukraine that doesn't look all that much different from where they come from - I don't see an overwhelming, swift victory for Russia here.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 7:15 am This is not going well for Russia.
Economy is crashing fast, oligarch yacht mechanics are sabotaging their employers ships, and preliminary reports of Russian casualties are surprising.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... ZybzF2lGpU
![]()
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/s ... 1-targets/Ukraine is recruiting a volunteer "IT army" of security researchers and hackers to conduct cyberattacks on thirty-one Russian entities, including government agencies, critical infrastructure, and banks.
Saturday afternoon, Ukraine's Minister for Digital Transformation Mykhaylo Fedorov announced that they need volunteer "digital talents" for an "IT Army" to conduct operational tasks against Russia on the cyber frontline.
Oh yeah. I wouldn't doubt that putting him so close to the Yelstin that he could take over wasn't some KGB plan all along.GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 7:34 amHard to know who would come next to fill the void. People thought Yeltsin was ineffective and incompetent, but then we ended up getting Putin at some point. I'm not saying that getting rid of Putin would be a bad thing, he's clearly maniacal, just saying that even with getting rid of Putin it doesn't mean it will be all rainbows and puppies with Russia.
Throw in one more primary military tactic: Every war Russia has EVER fought has been one of attrition. It’s never been about stellar battlefield tactics, technical superiority or moral high ground. They eventually overwhelm their opponents with massive numbers. It’s the way they’ve fought for 200+ years.GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 7:39 amHey, things went crappily for Russia when they went to war back in 1914 and all and we ended up with the Russian Revolution. Other than having nukes, a bunch of tanks, and tens of thousands of miles of battlefield, Russia has never been known as a crack and effective military force. And they're not really all that far from tsarist rule, even after all these years. Throw in the idea that the common soldier doesn't feel a real strong desire to give up his life to subdue a Ukraine that doesn't look all that much different from where they come from - I don't see an overwhelming, swift victory for Russia here.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 7:15 am This is not going well for Russia.
Economy is crashing fast, oligarch yacht mechanics are sabotaging their employers ships, and preliminary reports of Russian casualties are surprising.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... ZybzF2lGpU
![]()
I agree. Kinzinger saying we need to control airspace sure sounds like a sure fire way to piss Putin off.CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:17 am We are entering a very dangerous time here. EU is claiming it will send fighters, we and Germany are sending weapons, volunteers from NATO countries including the US are moving into Ukraine…
Something is very wrong with Putin and we need to be very careful how these actions get publicized. The guy literally used fantastical storytelling to concoct a justification for this invasion. We can help Ukraine but it needs to be much quieter. Putin really is unhinged and it wouldn’t take much for him to do something that would invoke the NATO charter. After that all bets are off
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Aren't most of those wars of attrition like Napoleonic and and WW2 defensive wars? They allow the climate, terrain and distance work against their enemies and then overwhelm with any citizen that can carry a gun (or ammo)?AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:09 amThrow in one more primary military tactic: Every war Russia has EVER fought has been one of attrition. It’s never been about stellar battlefield tactics, technical superiority or moral high ground. They eventually overwhelm their opponents with massive numbers. It’s the way they’ve fought for 200+ years.GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 7:39 am
Hey, things went crappily for Russia when they went to war back in 1914 and all and we ended up with the Russian Revolution. Other than having nukes, a bunch of tanks, and tens of thousands of miles of battlefield, Russia has never been known as a crack and effective military force. And they're not really all that far from tsarist rule, even after all these years. Throw in the idea that the common soldier doesn't feel a real strong desire to give up his life to subdue a Ukraine that doesn't look all that much different from where they come from - I don't see an overwhelming, swift victory for Russia here.
CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:17 am We are entering a very dangerous time here. EU is claiming it will send fighters, we and Germany are sending weapons, volunteers from NATO countries including the US are moving into Ukraine…
Something is very wrong with Putin and we need to be very careful how these actions get publicized. The guy literally used fantastical storytelling to concoct a justification for this invasion. We can help Ukraine but it needs to be much quieter. Putin really is unhinged and it wouldn’t take much for him to do something that would invoke the NATO charter. After that all bets are off
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
US strategy is not one of attrition. Hasn’t been since WWII. We’ve always assumed a large technology advantage and smaller, better trained, better equipped forces.Ibanez wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:31 amAren't most of those wars of attrition like Napoleonic and and WW2 defensive wars? They allow the climate, terrain and distance work against their enemies and then overwhelm with any citizen that can carry a gun (or ammo)?AZGrizFan wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:09 am
Throw in one more primary military tactic: Every war Russia has EVER fought has been one of attrition. It’s never been about stellar battlefield tactics, technical superiority or moral high ground. They eventually overwhelm their opponents with massive numbers. It’s the way they’ve fought for 200+ years.
It's escalating for sure. Putin isn't backing down. Does anyone NOT think they'll try to kill Zelensky at the "peace" talk today? Today's talk will go like this:CID1990 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 8:17 am We are entering a very dangerous time here. EU is claiming it will send fighters, we and Germany are sending weapons, volunteers from NATO countries including the US are moving into Ukraine…
Something is very wrong with Putin and we need to be very careful how these actions get publicized. The guy literally used fantastical storytelling to concoct a justification for this invasion. We can help Ukraine but it needs to be much quieter. Putin really is unhinged and it wouldn’t take much for him to do something that would invoke the NATO charter. After that all bets are off
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk