Team Trump v/s Everyone

[SeattleGriz]

How about the White House for coordinating with the boyfriend? Seems Biden is targeting Trump... something we were told wasn't happening.

This looks like a job for Jumpin' jimmy Jordan!

Oh Lord, Jim Jordan. I don't think there is one Republican I like. Different side of the same coin in my opinion.

[UNI88]

I'm giving you a taste of your own medicine. There is no significant difference between my attacks on habba and your attacks on wade.

Look at their work history. Vastly different as are their capabilities.

Did wade fail evidence 101 too?

You're attempting to debate which one is less qualified but they're both backbenchers. What fani did appears to be very wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence supports it just like trump was investigated and is being prosecuted.

I would think trump could afford better attornies. Why doesn't he have them? Maybe because he's a loose cannon? Or they're afraid he'll lie to them? Or ask them to do something that could get them disbarred? Or maybe because they're afraid he'll stiff them when it comes time to pay the bill? All legitimate concerns based on his history.

[UNI88]

This looks like a job for Jumpin' jimmy Jordan!

Oh Lord, Jim Jordan. I don't think there is one Republican I like. Different side of the same coin in my opinion.

Throwing gym jordan under the bus. The eventual fate of all who pledge loyalty/worship to trump.

You should let him know. You both have your heads stuck so far up trump's ass that he can't be far from you.

[houndawg]

Look at their work history. Vastly different as are their capabilities.

Did wade fail evidence 101 too?

You're attempting to debate which one is less qualified but they're both backbenchers. What fani did appears to be very wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence supports it just like trump was investigated and is being prosecuted.

I would think trump could afford better attornies. Why doesn't he have them? Maybe because he's a loose cannon? Or they're afraid he'll lie to them? Or ask them to do something that could get them disbarred? Or maybe because they're afraid he'll stiff them when it comes time to pay the bill? All legitimate concerns based on his history.

Another one that comes to mind is the delaying tactic of firing your incompetent counsel when you run out of things to appeal. Regardless of what else happens: she ain't getting paid

[SeattleGriz]

Look at their work history. Vastly different as are their capabilities.

Did wade fail evidence 101 too?

You're attempting to debate which one is less qualified but they're both backbenchers. What fani did appears to be very wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence supports it just like trump was investigated and is being prosecuted.

I would think trump could afford better attornies. Why doesn't he have them? Maybe because he's a loose cannon? Or they're afraid he'll lie to them? Or ask them to do something that could get them disbarred? Or maybe because they're afraid he'll stiff them when it comes time to pay the bill? All legitimate concerns based on his history.

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

[UNI88]

Did wade fail evidence 101 too?

You're attempting to debate which one is less qualified but they're both backbenchers. What fani did appears to be very wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence supports it just like trump was investigated and is being prosecuted.

I would think trump could afford better attornies. Why doesn't he have them? Maybe because he's a loose cannon? Or they're afraid he'll lie to them? Or ask them to do something that could get them disbarred? Or maybe because they're afraid he'll stiff them when it comes time to pay the bill? All legitimate concerns based on his history.

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

Any judge appointed by a Democrat is assumed to be biased. Any judge who rules against Trump is obviously biased. If we apply that logic the other way, we can assume that Aileen Cannon is obviously biased in trump's favor and can't be trusted either. Or is this approach a one-way street based solely on your ideology?

Your ability to flip-flop your approach so that trump benefits regardless is Olympic level.

[kalm]

Did wade fail evidence 101 too?

You're attempting to debate which one is less qualified but they're both backbenchers. What fani did appears to be very wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence supports it just like trump was investigated and is being prosecuted.

I would think trump could afford better attornies. Why doesn't he have them? Maybe because he's a loose cannon? Or they're afraid he'll lie to them? Or ask them to do something that could get them disbarred? Or maybe because they're afraid he'll stiff them when it comes time to pay the bill? All legitimate concerns based on his history.

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

Um…you do know he was already found by a jury to have raped her right?

This trial is just about him not being able to keep his mouth shut. Or a ploy by Donald garner sympathy.

[BDKJMU]

Did wade fail evidence 101 too?

You're attempting to debate which one is less qualified but they're both backbenchers. What fani did appears to be very wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence supports it just like trump was investigated and is being prosecuted.

I would think trump could afford better attornies. Why doesn't he have them? Maybe because he's a loose cannon? Or they're afraid he'll lie to them? Or ask them to do something that could get them disbarred? Or maybe because they're afraid he'll stiff them when it comes time to pay the bill? All legitimate concerns based on his history.

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

Yep. No more credible than that Balsey Ford woman who accused Kavanaugh. Just a PARTIAL samplting below of this woman’s looniness (because I could literally post double digit X & Truths quoting all the dumb shit she has said, esp about sexual maters.

Vanity Fair: In the last week you have gone from living a pretty private life to being very much in the public eye. What has that been like?”

E. Jean Carroll: “Fabulous. Buoyant. It’s almost merry…As I was talking to somebody on the phone yesterday, a man just stood in front of me bowing as I talked on the phone. It was amazing. It was like he was standing in front of Queen Elizabeth.”
——-
Vanity Fair: “In the book you call yourself a hideous woman.”

E. Jean Carroll: “Oh. I was bad, bad.”

Vanity Fair: “Because you flashed a professor.”

E. Jean Carroll: “He was the most popular professor on campus. So adorable. He went on to Washington to become quite a big deal. He was the golden boy. He was in Ballantine Hall lecturing. Ballantine Hall is the largest auditorium campus at the time. I had the temerity to walk on the stage in a trench coat and dark glasses, open my trench coat wearing a bright yellow bikini, and flash that man four, five, six seconds. He could barely stand up. Now, if a man did that today to a female professor, I hope that man would be in jail. So I put myself on the hideous list. He married a friend of mine…”

Vanity Fair: “Did you feel guilty looking back on that later?”

E. Jean Carroll: “No. I laugh my ass off about that…It was great.”

Vanity Fair: “You also confessed to sexually harassing Roger Ailes while you had a show on his cable channel America’s Talking. He is also on your list of hideous men, but was once a friend.”

E. Jean Carroll: “Oh, I did it. Every day I had a chance. I call him the pearl of his sex. Right on the air. I roll up my trouser legs. I would wait for the camera to come over. Then I would slowly pull up the right and then the left trouser leg. It would say Roger Ailes. I would say, ‘He’s my future husband.’ It never stopped. I’d ask him to twirl for me. I adored him.”

Vanity Fair: “What makes a hideous woman, as opposed to a hideous man, or is there no difference?”

E. Jean Carroll: “No, I don’t think there’s a difference. If you’re a hideous woman, you’re a hideous woman. What I did was wrong. Hideous women are hideous.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2019/0 ... nald-trump
You can tell Anderson Cooper is WTF..lets go to break..

Carrol is a complete and utter loon. But with the backing of the democrat machine, lawyers who are major democrat donors, a Trump hating judge and jury, in a he said/she said, they are always going to rule against Trump. With Biden doing terrible in the polls, we’ll see more Balsey Fords/E Jean Carrols this year..

[SeattleGriz]

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

Any judge appointed by a Democrat is assumed to be biased. Any judge who rules against Trump is obviously biased. If we apply that logic the other way, we can assume that Aileen Cannon is obviously biased in trump's favor and can't be trusted either. Or is this approach a one-way street based solely on your ideology?

Your ability to flip-flop your approach so that trump benefits regardless is Olympic level.

Dude. She can't remember the year or date it happened. It's Blasey Ford all over.

How about Tara Reid? You believe her?

[SeattleGriz]

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

Um…you do know he was already found by a jury to have raped her right?

This trial is just about him not being able to keep his mouth shut. Or a ploy by Donald garner sympathy.

Jesus Christ dude. He was not found guilty of rape.

This is a perfect example of how little you truly know about the specifics of the case.

As I keep saying, you and Uni show more hate for Trump than any caring of justice.

[kalm]

Um…you do know he was already found by a jury to have raped her right?

This trial is just about him not being able to keep his mouth shut. Or a ploy by Donald garner sympathy.

Jesus Christ dude. He was not found guilty of rape.

This is a perfect example of how little you truly know about the specifics of the case.

As I keep saying, you and Uni show more hate for Trump than any caring of justice.

C’mon, man. This is old news.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,' ”

- Judge Kaplan

You got me.

We don’t care for seditionists and sexual predators.

[Caribbean Hen]

Jesus Christ dude. He was not found guilty of rape.

This is a perfect example of how little you truly know about the specifics of the case.

As I keep saying, you and Uni show more hate for Trump than any caring of justice.

C’mon, man. This is old news.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,' ”

- Judge Kaplan

You got me.

We don’t care for seditionists and sexual predators.

Trump should claim this dingbat raped him….

[houndawg]

Did wade fail evidence 101 too?

You're attempting to debate which one is less qualified but they're both backbenchers. What fani did appears to be very wrong and should be investigated and prosecuted if the evidence supports it just like trump was investigated and is being prosecuted.

I would think trump could afford better attornies. Why doesn't he have them? Maybe because he's a loose cannon? Or they're afraid he'll lie to them? Or ask them to do something that could get them disbarred? Or maybe because they're afraid he'll stiff them when it comes time to pay the bill? All legitimate concerns based on his history.

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

A jury disagreed.

[houndawg]

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

Yep. No more credible than that Balsey Ford woman who accused Kavanaugh. Just a PARTIAL samplting below of this woman’s looniness (because I could literally post double digit X & Truths quoting all the dumb shit she has said, esp about sexual maters.

Vanity Fair: In the last week you have gone from living a pretty private life to being very much in the public eye. What has that been like?”

E. Jean Carroll: “Fabulous. Buoyant. It’s almost merry…As I was talking to somebody on the phone yesterday, a man just stood in front of me bowing as I talked on the phone. It was amazing. It was like he was standing in front of Queen Elizabeth.”
——-
Vanity Fair: “In the book you call yourself a hideous woman.”

E. Jean Carroll: “Oh. I was bad, bad.”

Vanity Fair: “Because you flashed a professor.”

E. Jean Carroll: “He was the most popular professor on campus. So adorable. He went on to Washington to become quite a big deal. He was the golden boy. He was in Ballantine Hall lecturing. Ballantine Hall is the largest auditorium campus at the time. I had the temerity to walk on the stage in a trench coat and dark glasses, open my trench coat wearing a bright yellow bikini, and flash that man four, five, six seconds. He could barely stand up. Now, if a man did that today to a female professor, I hope that man would be in jail. So I put myself on the hideous list. He married a friend of mine…”

Vanity Fair: “Did you feel guilty looking back on that later?”

E. Jean Carroll: “No. I laugh my ass off about that…It was great.”

Vanity Fair: “You also confessed to sexually harassing Roger Ailes while you had a show on his cable channel America’s Talking. He is also on your list of hideous men, but was once a friend.”

E. Jean Carroll: “Oh, I did it. Every day I had a chance. I call him the pearl of his sex. Right on the air. I roll up my trouser legs. I would wait for the camera to come over. Then I would slowly pull up the right and then the left trouser leg. It would say Roger Ailes. I would say, ‘He’s my future husband.’ It never stopped. I’d ask him to twirl for me. I adored him.”

Vanity Fair: “What makes a hideous woman, as opposed to a hideous man, or is there no difference?”

E. Jean Carroll: “No, I don’t think there’s a difference. If you’re a hideous woman, you’re a hideous woman. What I did was wrong. Hideous women are hideous.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2019/0 ... nald-trump
You can tell Anderson Cooper is WTF..lets go to break..

Carrol is a complete and utter loon. But with the backing of the democrat machine, lawyers who are major democrat donors, a Trump hating judge and jury, in a he said/she said, they are always going to rule against Trump. With Biden doing terrible in the polls, we’ll see more Balsey Fords/E Jean Carrols this year..

They wouldn't rule against him if he wouldn't grab them by the pussy

[BDKJMU]

Jesus Christ dude. He was not found guilty of rape.

This is a perfect example of how little you truly know about the specifics of the case.

As I keep saying, you and Uni show more hate for Trump than any caring of justice.

C’mon, man. This is old news.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,' ”

- Trump hating Judge Kaplan

You got me.

FIFY

[kalm]

C’mon, man. This is old news.

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,' ”

- Trump hating Judge Kaplan

You got me.

FIFY

Fact vs. opionion

[BDKJMU]

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

The Trump haters, the majority of the jury, disagreed.

FIFY..

[BDKJMU]

FIFY

Fact vs. opionion

No more opinion than the opinion of the judge and the opinion of a plurality of a civil nury.

[houndawg]

Fact vs. opionion

No more opinion than the opinion of the judge and the opinion of a plurality of a civil nury.

You know he did it. Everybody knows he did it. And when you're a star they let you do it . You can do anything, grab them by the pussy...

[BDKJMU]

No more opinion than the opinion of the judge and the opinion of a plurality of a civil nury.

You know he did it. Everybody knows he did it. And when you're a star they let you do it . You can do anything, grab them by the pussy...

No I don’t. No they don’t..And no you don’t. None of us except 2 people (and maybe not even 2) knows what actually happened.

And she would be a lot more credible if she wasn’t a $$$ amd fame seeking wack a doodle, and she hadn’t waited 30 years..

[UNI88]

Fact vs. opionion

No more opinion than the opinion of the judge and the opinion of a plurality of a civil nury.

Don’t bitch when the left uses the same logic on SCOTUS rulings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Fact vs. opionion

No more opinion than the opinion of the judge and the opinion of a plurality of a civil nury.

Of course it is. They both were presented with way more information and evidence than you and I.

[BDKJMU]

No more opinion than the opinion of the judge and the opinion of a plurality of a civil nury.

Don’t bitch when the left uses the same logic on SCOTUS rulings.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are SCOTUS rulings based on a he said/she situation said with no witnesses or evidence?

[SeattleGriz]

Already painted yourself in the corner and scrambling to get out of it. The fact you are citing the faux case of E Jean Carol and an obviously biased judge is weak.

Carol has no proof and couldn't even remember the year the supposed attack happened. Talk about evidence 101. What a joke.

Look at their work histories.

A jury disagreed.

We'll see what happens on appeal.

[SeattleGriz]

Doesn't get any better than this. These are the people going after Trump. Comically stupid.