Which 2 companies are those?
It sure as sh!t ain't OAN or Newsmax. Your belief in their propaganda doesn't mean it isn't propaganda and isn't just as bad as what the 30 are spreading.
You probably believe tucker's opinions are facts as well.
Which 2 companies are those?
I cant believe you missed the point
REUTERS??? They might be the most fair and balanced of all the ones you named.
NY Post always gets it rightUNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:03 pmREUTERS??? They might be the most fair and balanced of all the ones you named.
Let's not forget to include the NY Post, Washington Examiner, Conservative Treehouse, etc. with Fox, OAN & Newsmax.
Let's also acknowledge the echo chambers where MAQA yahoos go to spout their conspiracy theories and come away believing they're factual despite the lack of proof/evidence because so many other people were spouting the same bullsh!t that it has to be true.
What has happened to the media in this country is a shame but that shame isn't limited to ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, etc., Fox, OAN, Newsmax, NY Post, Washington Examiner, etc. are just as biased. They've all guilty of calling opinions facts and propaganda news in order to promote their agendas rather than reporting the news.
Which copy of the hard drive?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 4:56 amNY Post always gets it rightUNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:03 pm
REUTERS??? They might be the most fair and balanced of all the ones you named.
Let's not forget to include the NY Post, Washington Examiner, Conservative Treehouse, etc. with Fox, OAN & Newsmax.
Let's also acknowledge the echo chambers where MAQA yahoos go to spout their conspiracy theories and come away believing they're factual despite the lack of proof/evidence because so many other people were spouting the same bullsh!t that it has to be true.
What has happened to the media in this country is a shame but that shame isn't limited to ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, etc., Fox, OAN, Newsmax, NY Post, Washington Examiner, etc. are just as biased. They've all guilty of calling opinions facts and propaganda news in order to promote their agendas rather than reporting the news.
They broke the hunter laptop story that was covered up by the Biden loving 4th Estate and the social media big boys blocked the story from their networks as well. Nobody is allowed to see it.
All happened a few months before the election
Joey Rottens deep swamp rushed to his rescue with 51 fake signatures, saying the New York post story on the laptop was Russian disinformation. This was the same laptop that was used to prosecute Hunter.
Not one of these media outlets has admitted they got it wrong
So don’t tell me the election wasn’t stolen because it was stolen in plain sight
The one they used for the guilty verdict in courtkalm wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 5:39 amWhich copy of the hard drive?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 4:56 am
NY Post always gets it right
They broke the hunter laptop story that was covered up by the Biden loving 4th Estate and the social media big boys blocked the story from their networks as well. Nobody is allowed to see it.
All happened a few months before the election
Joey Rottens deep swamp rushed to his rescue with 51 fake signatures, saying the New York post story on the laptop was Russian disinformation. This was the same laptop that was used to prosecute Hunter.
Not one of these media outlets has admitted they got it wrong
So don’t tell me the election wasn’t stolen because it was stolen in plain sight
For tax evasion and the weapons charge?
Does Fox get credit for admitting they were wrong? Or does that admission not count because it happened as a result of legal action?Caribbean Hen wrote:NY Post always gets it rightUNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 12, 2024 5:03 pm REUTERS??? They might be the most fair and balanced of all the ones you named.
Let's not forget to include the NY Post, Washington Examiner, Conservative Treehouse, etc. with Fox, OAN & Newsmax.
Let's also acknowledge the echo chambers where MAQA yahoos go to spout their conspiracy theories and come away believing they're factual despite the lack of proof/evidence because so many other people were spouting the same bullsh!t that it has to be true.
What has happened to the media in this country is a shame but that shame isn't limited to ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, etc., Fox, OAN, Newsmax, NY Post, Washington Examiner, etc. are just as biased. They've all guilty of calling opinions facts and propaganda news in order to promote their agendas rather than reporting the news.
They broke the hunter laptop story that was covered up by the Biden loving 4th Estate and the social media big boys blocked the story from their networks as well. Nobody is allowed to see it.
All happened a few months before the election
Joey Rottens deep swamp rushed to his rescue with 51 fake signatures, saying the New York post story on the laptop was Russian disinformation. This was the same laptop that was used to prosecute Hunter.
Not one of these media outlets has admitted they got it wrong
So don’t tell me the election wasn’t stolen because it was stolen in plain sight
Tucker Derangement Syndrome. TDS type IIUNI88 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 13, 2024 9:51 amDoes Fox get credit for admitting they were wrong? Or does that admission not count because it happened as a result of legal action?Caribbean Hen wrote:
NY Post always gets it right
They broke the hunter laptop story that was covered up by the Biden loving 4th Estate and the social media big boys blocked the story from their networks as well. Nobody is allowed to see it.
All happened a few months before the election
Joey Rottens deep swamp rushed to his rescue with 51 fake signatures, saying the New York post story on the laptop was Russian disinformation. This was the same laptop that was used to prosecute Hunter.
Not one of these media outlets has admitted they got it wrong
So don’t tell me the election wasn’t stolen because it was stolen in plain sight
I’d give them some credit for sh!tcanning that loud-mouthed twat, tucker putinsbitch.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Peace without NATO membership for Ukraine is temporary. It just gives Putin time to rearm and train his conscripts before attacking again.SDHornet wrote:Haven't kept up on this topic much but from the info I've seen it looks like the Russians are just slowly chewing away territory and manpower in Eastern Ukraine. Ukraine air defenses seem to be all but gone and the Russians are just flattening Ukrainian positions with glide bombs.
Saw someone speculate that Ukraine might get serious about a peace deal given that Mean Tweets is now favored to win in November and he would likely draw an end to this whole debacle if that happens (one of the reasons for the assassination attempt yesterday). For the sake of all the Ukrainians getting press ganged into cannon fodder, I hope peace finds this corner of the globe sooner rather than later.
lolwut
Indeed. Ukraine is very likely going to be unable to push Russia out of its territory. Just like Crimea, Russia will apparently be holding on to Ukrainian territory for the foreseeable future. But if Ukraine signs off on any "peace" treaty, it'll have to be with NATO membership for what's left of Ukraine or Russia will just continue the war as they did after seizing Crimea. Russia won't chance NATO getting involved, so the best way to save the rest of the Ukraine is to get a treaty now at the same time they get NATO membership.UNI88 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 9:52 pmPeace without NATO membership for Ukraine is temporary. It just gives Putin time to rearm and train his conscripts before attacking again.SDHornet wrote:Haven't kept up on this topic much but from the info I've seen it looks like the Russians are just slowly chewing away territory and manpower in Eastern Ukraine. Ukraine air defenses seem to be all but gone and the Russians are just flattening Ukrainian positions with glide bombs.
Saw someone speculate that Ukraine might get serious about a peace deal given that Mean Tweets is now favored to win in November and he would likely draw an end to this whole debacle if that happens (one of the reasons for the assassination attempt yesterday). For the sake of all the Ukrainians getting press ganged into cannon fodder, I hope peace finds this corner of the globe sooner rather than later.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Huh? Negotiate what? Giving up national sovereignty? How would that go? Russia comes to the table and says "we're still holding onto territory in Crimea we illegally stole a decade ago, but now we also want the eastern portion of your country. We believe we're entitled to it because we're Russians, and by the way, we don't even think you're a real country". How is that even a negotiation? Give us the land or we'll attack (well, increase the attack, we've been attacking with guerilla groups for a decade) and take it anyway? When do nations get to hold onto their sovereignty and say no? I suppose when we give NATO membership to what's left of Ukraine will be when they can say no.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:40 am It all would of been much better if they negotiated at the beginning but we needed to waive those Ukraine flags
So dumb
Killing people unnecessarily for startersGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:50 amHuh? Negotiate what? Giving up national sovereignty? How would that go? Russia comes to the table and says "we're still holding onto territory in Crimea we illegally stole a decade ago, but now we also want the eastern portion of your country. We believe we're entitled to it because we're Russians, and by the way, we don't even think you're a real country". How is that even a negotiation? Give us the land or we'll attack (well, increase the attack, we've been attacking with guerilla groups for a decade) and take it anyway? When do nations get to hold onto their sovereignty and say no? I suppose when we give NATO membership to what's left of Ukraine will be when they can say no.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:40 am It all would of been much better if they negotiated at the beginning but we needed to waive those Ukraine flags
So dumb
So the poor folks who fought to keep their homes and their country from the invading Russians? Pretty sure a lot of them had the option to flee and they stayed and fought for their homes. Who's fault is that, them for being stubborn or the invaders shooting them?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:26 amKilling people unnecessarily for startersGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:50 am
Huh? Negotiate what? Giving up national sovereignty? How would that go? Russia comes to the table and says "we're still holding onto territory in Crimea we illegally stole a decade ago, but now we also want the eastern portion of your country. We believe we're entitled to it because we're Russians, and by the way, we don't even think you're a real country". How is that even a negotiation? Give us the land or we'll attack (well, increase the attack, we've been attacking with guerilla groups for a decade) and take it anyway? When do nations get to hold onto their sovereignty and say no? I suppose when we give NATO membership to what's left of Ukraine will be when they can say no.
There are no solutionsGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:48 amSo the poor folks who fought to keep their homes and their country from the invading Russians? Pretty sure a lot of them had the option to flee and they stayed and fought for their homes. Who's fault is that, them for being stubborn or the invaders shooting them?
The narrative that russia wouldn't have invaded Ukraine if trump were President is a false narrative.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 11:22 am The narrative that Russia would roll into Poland is a false narrative
That worked out so well in the 1930's that we should do it again.
You need to send that to the countries being invaded.
You're not attempting to revive the false narrative that it's Ukraine's fault they were invaded are you?