Noooooo
The Island always gets fired up about their hoops team and it’s been 20 years since they made the Olympics
Yes he was and best team player of all time
I really don't believe it's Christian thing, it's political and being labeled as "Christians" being butthurt. Real Christians could care less.
I'm seeing quite a bit of outrage from Christians on the feed actually
I agree. The issue is that real Christian’s are either a small minority or they are mostly silent on these cultural issues.
Sadly true. Islam is also dominated by the extremists similar to the Republican Party. But even more violent.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:40 amJust imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and they mocked Muslims… people would die for that
What other foot?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:40 amJust imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and they mocked Muslims… people would die for that
I don't have any stake in this fight, but I don't get it where people are now saying there was no connection to the Last Supper in the start to that segment. I remember watching it in real time and the first thing I thought "hmm, Last Supper". Whether it was intentional or not, whether it was done as parody or not, I don't think there's anyway that someone could honestly say that didn't look like the Last Supper. To me, that's a perfect example of gaslighting. "No, silly, that's not the Last Supper, you don't know what you're looking at". And to me, even if it was done as parody, I'm fine with that. As the artist said, it was supposed to be about liberty and the freedom of expression, which to me, even a parody would be. But let's not pretend the thing didn't look like the Last Supper when it clearly did.clenz wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:28 amWhat other foot?Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:40 am
Just imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and they mocked Muslims… people would die for that
One foot is paying homage to the ancient greeks - where the games originated - and the other foot is Islam who wasn't involved in this at all?
Hmm...
Outside of xenophobia and butt hurt what do Islam or Christianity have to do with this?
Seems like quite a few people disagree…GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:51 amI don't have any stake in this fight, but I don't get it where people are now saying there was no connection to the Last Supper in the start to that segment. I remember watching it in real time and the first thing I thought "hmm, Last Supper". Whether it was intentional or not, whether it was done as parody or not, I don't think there's anyway that someone could honestly say that didn't look like the Last Supper. To me, that's a perfect example of gaslighting. "No, silly, that's not the Last Supper, you don't know what you're looking at". And to me, even if it was done as parody, I'm fine with that. As the artist said, it was supposed to be about liberty and the freedom of expression, which to me, even a parody would be. But let's not pretend the thing didn't look like the Last Supper when it clearly did.
Peking James isn't top 10 that's for sure. Everyone on your list is ahead of him. O Robertson and Duncan too. You can make a great case for Curry as well
Just more gaslighting. The blue guy supposed to be Dionysius wasn't on screen when they first went to the image. And they even went as far as to have the central figure at the table have a halo-like image behind them, as was done in the Last Supper. And yes, I know it is housed in Italy and not France, I've actually been to Milan and saw it. Again, whether it was intentional or not, trying to pretend the thing, at least at the start, didn't look like the Last Supper is pure and simple gaslighting.kalm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 9:28 amSeems like quite a few people disagree…GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:51 am
I don't have any stake in this fight, but I don't get it where people are now saying there was no connection to the Last Supper in the start to that segment. I remember watching it in real time and the first thing I thought "hmm, Last Supper". Whether it was intentional or not, whether it was done as parody or not, I don't think there's anyway that someone could honestly say that didn't look like the Last Supper. To me, that's a perfect example of gaslighting. "No, silly, that's not the Last Supper, you don't know what you're looking at". And to me, even if it was done as parody, I'm fine with that. As the artist said, it was supposed to be about liberty and the freedom of expression, which to me, even a parody would be. But let's not pretend the thing didn't look like the Last Supper when it clearly did.
I don't like Lebron and think he's a hypocrite when it comes to speaking up for disadvantaged people but putting my personal feelings aside and objectively looking at him solely as a basketball player, he's one of the greatest of all time, ahead of Duncan and Curry.
Pound for pound, I take Curry any day over LeBron. I’m not saying LeBron isn’t great, but Curry is just spectacularUNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 10:08 amI don't like Lebron and think he's a hypocrite when it comes to speaking up for disadvantaged people but putting my personal feelings aside and objectively looking at him solely as a basketball player, he's one of the greatest of all time, ahead of Duncan and Curry.
I'd take AI over Lebron on a pound for pound basis.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:29 amPound for pound, I take Curry any day over LeBron. I’m not saying LeBron isn’t great, but Curry is just spectacularUNI88 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 10:08 am
I don't like Lebron and think he's a hypocrite when it comes to speaking up for disadvantaged people but putting my personal feelings aside and objectively looking at him solely as a basketball player, he's one of the greatest of all time, ahead of Duncan and Curry.
ThisGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:51 amI don't have any stake in this fight, but I don't get it where people are now saying there was no connection to the Last Supper in the start to that segment. I remember watching it in real time and the first thing I thought "hmm, Last Supper". Whether it was intentional or not, whether it was done as parody or not, I don't think there's anyway that someone could honestly say that didn't look like the Last Supper. To me, that's a perfect example of gaslighting. "No, silly, that's not the Last Supper, you don't know what you're looking at". And to me, even if it was done as parody, I'm fine with that. As the artist said, it was supposed to be about liberty and the freedom of expression, which to me, even a parody would be. But let's not pretend the thing didn't look like the Last Supper when it clearly did.
Is it gaslighting when conservatives were gaslighting the event first? Maybe just a reaction to gaslighting and defense of the intent?GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 9:41 amJust more gaslighting. The blue guy supposed to be Dionysius wasn't on screen when they first went to the image. And they even went as far as to have the central figure at the table have a halo-like image behind them, as was done in the Last Supper. And yes, I know it is housed in Italy and not France, I've actually been to Milan and saw it. Again, whether it was intentional or not, trying to pretend the thing, at least at the start, didn't look like the Last Supper is pure and simple gaslighting.
I don't think people should be upset about it, but then again, I think folks should be able to draw or depict Muhammed too. I support the artist and his contention that art should be able to say or show anything in a free society. That's why I don't understand the gaslighting. You showed something that looked very similar to the Last Supper, why degrade the people who recognized that?
You might be mixing up Salmon Rushdie and the Danish cartoons but your point stands - there are similarities between the outrage of American evangelicals and Muslims.Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:56 amThisGannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 8:51 am
I don't have any stake in this fight, but I don't get it where people are now saying there was no connection to the Last Supper in the start to that segment. I remember watching it in real time and the first thing I thought "hmm, Last Supper". Whether it was intentional or not, whether it was done as parody or not, I don't think there's anyway that someone could honestly say that didn't look like the Last Supper. To me, that's a perfect example of gaslighting. "No, silly, that's not the Last Supper, you don't know what you're looking at". And to me, even if it was done as parody, I'm fine with that. As the artist said, it was supposed to be about liberty and the freedom of expression, which to me, even a parody would be. But let's not pretend the thing didn't look like the Last Supper when it clearly did.
Pure mockery on the World Stage
Who was the journalist that got killed for mocking Muslims a few years ago with a lampoon in a newspaper, which is hardly the scale of the Olympics
I’m not personally triggered by it either but it is what it is
...similar if you haven't seen the Feast of Dionysus, if you'd seen both you would have recognized the difference. I didn't until I read about, its not the sort of thing a non-religious STEM student would be likely to cross paths with - but every liberal arts major in the nation sems to have spotted it right away. Its definitely not something you'd expect a trumper to know.GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 9:41 amJust more gaslighting. The blue guy supposed to be Dionysius wasn't on screen when they first went to the image. And they even went as far as to have the central figure at the table have a halo-like image behind them, as was done in the Last Supper. And yes, I know it is housed in Italy and not France, I've actually been to Milan and saw it. Again, whether it was intentional or not, trying to pretend the thing, at least at the start, didn't look like the Last Supper is pure and simple gaslighting.
I don't think people should be upset about it, but then again, I think folks should be able to draw or depict Muhammed too. I support the artist and his contention that art should be able to say or show anything in a free society. That's why I don't understand the gaslighting. You showed something that looked very similar to the Last Supper, why degrade the people who recognized that?
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/artic ... 0dy7mcekegApollo, god of the sun, was recognisable by his halo, Schoonenberg said, Dionysus by the grapes, Poseidon, god of the sea, by his trident, Artemis by the moon and Venus by Cupid. Minerva, goddess of wisdom, and Mars, god of war, were also present.
“So there is no question in this tableau of an insult to Christians,” the historian said. “We’re talking about the Olympic gods in a representation of van Bijlert’s work. The Greek gods came together on Olympus – where the ancient Games took place.”
The Magnin Museum did, however, acknowledge similarities between the work and The Last Supper, which was painted more than a century earlier before the Protestant Reformation, which rejected Catholic art and even destroyed many works.
That may go some way to explaining the confusion. “In the context of the Reformation … the artist found a strategy for painting a Christ-related Last Supper under cover of a mythological subject matter,” the museum said.
You're talking about two groups of people that are willingly bamboozledCaribbean Hen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 6:40 amJust imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and they mocked Muslims… people would die for that
So you're saying that the person who included this in the opening ceremonies was trying to recreate a Dutch painter's version of the Greek Gods, and the Dutch guy in turn was probably heavily influenced by Da Vinci's work from a century earlier and could actually have been using the veneer of the Greek gods while actually trying to be recreating the Last Supper. But Christians out there who took offense to this are way off base in thinking this was, intentional or not, an allusion to the Last Supper?kalm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 12:20 pmhttps://www.theguardian.com/sport/artic ... 0dy7mcekegApollo, god of the sun, was recognisable by his halo, Schoonenberg said, Dionysus by the grapes, Poseidon, god of the sea, by his trident, Artemis by the moon and Venus by Cupid. Minerva, goddess of wisdom, and Mars, god of war, were also present.
“So there is no question in this tableau of an insult to Christians,” the historian said. “We’re talking about the Olympic gods in a representation of van Bijlert’s work. The Greek gods came together on Olympus – where the ancient Games took place.”
The Magnin Museum did, however, acknowledge similarities between the work and The Last Supper, which was painted more than a century earlier before the Protestant Reformation, which rejected Catholic art and even destroyed many works.
That may go some way to explaining the confusion. “In the context of the Reformation … the artist found a strategy for painting a Christ-related Last Supper under cover of a mythological subject matter,” the museum said.
Also this…
So you’re implying that the person who included this in the opening ceremonies was secretively trying to reclaim DaVinci for what happened during the reformation? Christian’s should be elated!GannonFan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:07 pmSo you're saying that the person who included this in the opening ceremonies was trying to recreate a Dutch painter's version of the Greek Gods, and the Dutch guy in turn was probably heavily influenced by Da Vinci's work from a century earlier and could actually have been using the veneer of the Greek gods while actually trying to be recreating the Last Supper. But Christians out there who took offense to this are way off base in thinking this was, intentional or not, an allusion to the Last Supper?kalm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 29, 2024 12:20 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/artic ... 0dy7mcekeg
Also this…