UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:21 pm
Are you stoned? What Ganny posted is not "pretty much the same thing polished up a bit". Leans left ≠ hard left
I said firmly left. Wow you have CHDS a side effect of TDS
You also said "recently hard left". Regardless, 'hard left" or "firmly left" is NOT "pretty close" or "pretty much the same thing polished up a bit" as "leans left"
kalm wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:30 am
The NYT is hardly “lefty”. Moderate-liberal at best.
Recently hard left but after being completely wrong on Joey Rotten, unlike myself, a slight tick towards center but still firmly left
Your uniiskickingmyassitis is getting the best of you. Maybe some quite time on the fainting couch with SeattleDingleberry would help. Just don't vance the poor couch.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
The new legal complaint has additionally come under fire from abortion rights groups and Democrats for appearing to argue that the three states would like to see more teenagers give birth. In a section entitled “Injuries to Plaintiffs’ Population Interests” toward the end of the 199-page filing, it discusses the effects of “loss of fetal life and potential births, leading to a resulting reduction in the actual or potential population of each state.”
The filing cited one study on the effects of the Dobbs decision on fertility, which noted that in states where abortion is banned, birth rates were more likely to increase the farther women seeking abortions have to drive to reach a state where abortion is still legal.
The legal brief said it is “striking” that the study did not find an increase in births for teenagers aged 15-to-19, and stated that the study concluded this may be the result of younger women being better at navigating online resources to order abortion pills through the mail.
“This study thus suggests that remote dispensing of abortion drugs by mail, common carrier, and interactive computer service is depressing expected birth rates for teenaged mothers in plaintiff states,” the complaint said. “A loss of potential population causes further injuries as well,” it added, going on to note the potential loss of “political representation” or access to federal funds.
Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri Oct 11, 2024 4:37 am
I said firmly left. Wow you have CHDS a side effect of TDS
You also said "recently hard left". Regardless, 'hard left" or "firmly left" is NOT "pretty close" or "pretty much the same thing polished up a bit" as "leans left"
Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Thu Oct 10, 2024 9:41 am Recently hard left but after being completely wrong on Joey Rotten, unlike myself, a slight tick towards center but still firmly left
Your uniiskickingmyassitis is getting the best of you. Maybe some quite time on the fainting couch with SeattleDingleberry would help. Just don't vance the poor couch.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2024 11:05 am
Responding but trump is telling me you have nothing without telling me you have nothing.
Frame this. Its the only post in the last 500 that hasnt mentioned who you were thinking about when you hit submit.
Does your boyfriend have your phone?
88DS is getting the best of you.
You have a choice, you can debate with some level of logic, reason and a little humor like BDK or you can go off the deep end and resort to name calling and claiming anyone who disagrees with you in unhinged like Dingleberry.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
