2025-2026 Domestic Leftist Violence Thread

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

Lord these unhinged lib retard videos are endless.

[BDKJMU]

Well, she does have a point. She’s so wide she takes up over half the sidewalk.

[BDKJMU]

That’s ok, 1,000 more reinforcements are on the way. And if that isn’t enough, federalize the Nat Guard and send in thousands of them.

[UNI88]

He was just trolling.

Isn't that what MAQA yahoos say when trump spews hyperbolic crap?

No, it just shows how retarded the left is:
-J6 was worse than 9/11.
-J6 was worse than Pearl Harbor.
-ICE enforcement in Minneapolis is like Day 3 at Gettysburg.
Etc, etc, etc.

Just like these show how moronic MAQA is:
- The 2020 election was the greatest crime/scam/fraud in the history of our country.
- If I lose our country will be destroyed. There will be no America left.
- I did more than any president since Lincoln.
- No one in history has been treated so unfairly.
Etc, etc, etc.

The parallels are obvious.

[BDKJMU]

[Gil Dobie]

Adam Swart, CEO of Crowds on Demand, told Fox News Digital his firm "would not touch the Minneapolis protests with a 10-foot pole," citing blocked roadways, obstruction of federal agents and threats against authorities after a fatal shooting during an ICE enforcement operation.

"Blocking roadways, obstructing federal agents and threatening authorities are illegal, and we don’t engage in any form of illegal protest," Swart said, warning the chaos playing out on city streets will have the opposite effect demonstrators claim to want. "The impact of these protests will actually be to increase ICE operations, not decrease them."

[BDKJMU]

Adam Swart, CEO of Crowds on Demand, told Fox News Digital his firm "would not touch the Minneapolis protests with a 10-foot pole," citing blocked roadways, obstruction of federal agents and threats against authorities after a fatal shooting during an ICE enforcement operation.

"Blocking roadways, obstructing federal agents and threatening authorities are illegal, and we don’t engage in any form of illegal protest," Swart said, warning the chaos playing out on city streets will have the opposite effect demonstrators claim to want. "The impact of these protests will actually be to increase ICE operations, not decrease them."

Sounds like Rent a Riot..

[BDKJMU]

https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2010419409098301780

He tried to grab the agent’s gun you liar

Why did you conveniently leave that out
@GavinNewsom?

Come on X, a commie lib agitator getting a face full of pepper spray isn’t graphic content.

[BDKJMU]

BuT thEy’rE jUSt PeaCfuLL prOtEStOrs.

[UNI88]

BuT thEy’rE jUSt PeaCfuLL prOtEStOrs.

ICE Agent weaponizes vehicle and attempts to kill protesters.

[BDKJMU]

[BDKJMU]

Well, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

[BDKJMU]

Just endless leftist FAFO videos.

[BDKJMU]

[UNI88]

Another example of an ICE Agent weaponizing their vehicle and threatening the life of a protester.

You don't get it both ways - If it's true for Jonathan Ross then it's true for the protesters.

[Caribbean Hen]

No, it just shows how retarded the left is:
-J6 was worse than 9/11.
-J6 was worse than Pearl Harbor.
-ICE enforcement in Minneapolis is like Day 3 at Gettysburg.
Etc, etc, etc.

Just like these show how moronic MAQA is:
- The 2020 election was the greatest crime/scam/fraud in the history of our country.

Actually it was the winner of the 2020 that was the greatest crime/scam/fraud in the history of our country …. Joey The Con Biden… a pathetic joke of a President


Some of us knew this before he “won” but we only voted once

[Caribbean Hen]

Another example of an ICE Agent weaponizing their vehicle and threatening the life of a protester.

You don't get it both ways - If it's true for Jonathan Ross then it's true for the protesters.

Idiotic take

[UNI88]

Another example of an ICE Agent weaponizing their vehicle and threatening the life of a protester.

You don't get it both ways - If it's true for Jonathan Ross then it's true for the protesters.

Idiotic take

You say that because it runs counter to the agenda you're pushing not because of the substance of the point which makes it a empty, worthless response.

[Caribbean Hen]

Idiotic take

You say that because it runs counter to the agenda you're pushing not because of the substance of the point which makes it a empty, worthless response.

I said that because the spoiled brain washed attention seeking moron is impeding with a law-enforcement operation

[BDKJMU]

Truth.

[Gil Dobie]

Have the people being deported protested to support the ICE protesters? I've only seen ICE protesters supporting ICE protesters.

[UNI88]

Have the people being deported protested to support the ICE protesters? I've only seen ICE protesters supporting ICE protesters.

Gil, here's some more info on why regular citizens and not just "agitators" are pushing back against CBP/ICE ...

The Trump Administration Says It's Illegal To Record Videos of ICE. Here's What the Law Says.

"Similarly, [U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Greg] Bovino testified that he has instructed his officers to arrest protesters who make hyperbolic comments in the heat of political demonstrations, even though such statements—which do not constitute true threats—are protected speech," the motion argued. (Hott and Bovino's depositions were filed under seal, and those comments were later redacted in a corrected filing by the lawsuit plaintiffs, but not before others took screenshots of them.)

Based on voluminous evidence that feds in Chicago ignored her previous orders to curb their use of force, U.S. District Court Judge Sara Ellis issued a preliminary injunction against DHS in early November 2025, saying the government's conduct "shocked the conscience."

Ellis found much of the officials' testimony not credible. Bovino, for instance, testified that he never used force against a protester he was filmed tackling, and in another instance, Ellis said, he lied about being hit with a rock before firing tear gas at demonstrators. Nor did evidence support the government's claims that federal officers issued warnings before firing less-than-lethal projectiles at those protesters.

"Describing rapid response networks and neighborhood moms as professional agitators shows just how out of touch these agents are, and how extreme their views are," said Ellis.

The Trump administration responded by calling Ellis an "activist judge," but it is squarely wrong when it comes to recording and protesting the police. Cato Institute senior fellow Walter Olson points out that, "While the Supreme Court itself hasn't yet faced the issue squarely, the seven federal circuits that have done so…all agree that the First Amendment protects the right to record police performing their duties in public."

Likewise, federal circuits have upheld the right to use vulgar language to oppose police without fear of retaliation, and to warn others of nearby police checkpoints or speed traps.

As Olson writes, the administration's "attempt to alter reality by establishing new legal facts on the ground" ultimately serves as a green light for informal repression. "If the agents come to believe that they have blanket immunity [for] whatever they do, or that citizens have no right to record them, they are more likely to take aggressive informal action, such as grabbing phones or taking news reporters into custody on charges of obstruction (perhaps later quietly dropped)."
...
Recording government agents is one of the few tools citizens have to hold state power accountable. Any attempt to redefine observation as "violence" is not only unconstitutional—it's authoritarian gaslighting. When a government fears cameras more than crimes, it isn't protecting the rule of law. It's protecting itself.

When you're on the wrong side of the Cato Institute, you're probably on the wrong side of the Constitution and freedom.

[BDKJMU]

Have the people being deported protested to support the ICE protesters? I've only seen ICE protesters supporting ICE protesters.

Gil, here's some more info on why regular citizens and not just "agitators" are pushing back against CBP/ICE ...

The Trump Administration Says It's Illegal To Record Videos of ICE. Here's What the Law Says.

The headline is BS because it claims that the Trump admin stated that the simple act of videotaping is illegal. They didn’t, because it isn’t. They are quoted as saying:

Noem said, "Violence is anything that threatens them and their safety, so it is doxing them, it's videotaping them where they're at when they're out on operations, encouraging other people to come and to throw things, rocks, bottles."…

…McLaughlin called "videotaping ICE law enforcement and posting photos and videos of them online" a form of doxing.

The act of videotaping to doxx and or incite obstruction or violence is illegal.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/119
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/115