Team Trump v/s Everyone

[SeattleGriz]

Sheer stupidity on your statement. Nobody gave a shit but you and a runt of a pedophile. Nice company prevert.

You can't defend trump's boorish behavior so you resort to name calling. Lame!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I called you no names. I said you approve of a pedophiles words.

[UNI88]

You can't defend trump's boorish behavior so you resort to name calling. Lame!

I called you no names. I said you approve of a pedophiles words.

I posted the tweet because of the video not because I approve or disapprove of krassenstein's words and the video speaks for itself

You on the other hand have shown that you definitely approve of a pedophile's words

[SeattleGriz]

I called you no names. I said you approve of a pedophiles words.

I posted the tweet because of the video not because I approve or disapprove of krassenstein's words and the video speaks for itself

You on the other hand have shown that you definitely approve of a pedophile's words

I'm not the one who aligns their political stance with a pedophile. Uni Krassesstein.

[UNI88]

I posted the tweet because of the video not because I approve or disapprove of krassenstein's words and the video speaks for itself

You on the other hand have shown that you definitely approve of a pedophile's words

I'm not the one who aligns their political stance with a pedophile. Uni Krassesstein.

Yes you are SGtrump.

[Caribbean Hen]

Spoken by someone with some experience for once?

Yep

I was never interested in cults until MAGA came along. After reading up on them (you know, educating yourself with expert opinions and facts) I find the phenomena quite interesting.

Who are your experts

[SeattleGriz]

I'm not the one who aligns their political stance with a pedophile. Uni Krassesstein.

Yes you are SGtrump.

No I'm not

[UNI88]

Yes you are SGtrump.

No I'm not

If that were true, his DOJ would release the files and prove it.

[BDKJMU]

Spoken by someone with some experience for once?

Yep

I was never interested in cults until MAGA came along. After reading up on them (you know, educating yourself with expert opinions and facts) I find the phenomena quite interesting.

Heck, you’re a member of several religious cults.
-The woke trans ideologist cult.
-The climatologist cult.
-The TDS cult..

[SeattleGriz]

No I'm not

If that were true, his DOJ would release the files and prove it.

What files?

[UNI88]

If that were true, his DOJ would release the EPSTEIN FILES and prove it.

What files?

Don't be an obtuse asshat.

[SeattleGriz]

What files?

Don't be an obtuse asshat.

Oh my God. The files Joe Biden sat on for four years? Jesus Christ you just can't quit with the conspiracy can you?

[kalm]

Don't be an obtuse asshat.

Oh my God. The files Joe Biden sat on for four years? Jesus Christ you just can't quit with the conspiracy can you?

4 years is about how far behind you are. The Maxwell file and sealed indictments prevented it.

And again, if there was further delay or Dems involved, Trump should be coming after them. But for some reason he’s not.

Check back with us once you’ve read up on the case.

[Caribbean Hen]

Don't be an obtuse asshat.

Oh my God. The files Joe Biden sat on for four years? Jesus Christ you just can't quit with the conspiracy can you?

I just had a vision of TDS 88’s dog snarling at him when he enters the room

[kalm]

I was never interested in cults until MAGA came along. After reading up on them (you know, educating yourself with expert opinions and facts) I find the phenomena quite interesting.

Heck, you’re a member of several religious cults.
-The woke trans ideologist cult.
-The climatologist cult.
-The TDS cult..

You’re a member of the don’t know shit cult.

cult/kəlt/A cult is a cohesive group—often religious, but not exclusively—characterized by an authoritarian, charismatic leader, high-intensity coercive control, and extreme devotion. These groups typically isolate members, discourage outside thought, and exploit them financially or emotionally.

[Caribbean Hen]

Oh my God. The files Joe Biden sat on for four years? Jesus Christ you just can't quit with the conspiracy can you?

4 years is about how far behind you are. The Maxwell file and sealed indictments prevented it.

And again, if there was further delay or Dems involved, Trump should be coming after them. But for some reason he’s not.

Check back with us once you’ve read up on the case.

We didn’t need any Epstein files for Biden

His own daughter turned him in, and you said it was fake news

Not to mention how many times Joey Rotten was staggering around a room full of school children but always managed to sniff the young girls ….

[kalm]

4 years is about how far behind you are. The Maxwell file and sealed indictments prevented it.

And again, if there was further delay or Dems involved, Trump should be coming after them. But for some reason he’s not.

Check back with us once you’ve read up on the case.

We didn’t need any Epstein files for Biden

His own daughter turned him in, and you said it was fake news

Not to mention how many times Joey Rotten was staggering around a room full of school children but always managed to sniff the young girls ….

Well Epstein with the sex trafficking, pedophilia, rape, etc. is what we’re taking about here. It’s a slightly bigger story than touchy feely grandpa.

But feel free to start a thread about all of the accusations, indictments, convictions, etc surrounding it.

Now…setting your Biden infatuation aside for a minute, what do you think of the Epstein files and story?

[kalm]

The list of corruption stories is long and impressive and surprisingly unhidden. Trump will likely die before any prosecutions take place but family and hangers on will be looked at for sure.

[SeattleGriz]

Oh my God. The files Joe Biden sat on for four years? Jesus Christ you just can't quit with the conspiracy can you?

4 years is about how far behind you are. The Maxwell file and sealed indictments prevented it.

And again, if there was further delay or Dems involved, Trump should be coming after them. But for some reason he’s not.

Check back with us once you’ve read up on the case.

Right. Like any of that would have prevented leaking. Nothing came out. Nothing. At this point, there is more dirt on you being a pedophile than Trump.

[Caribbean Hen]

It sure is interesting how our hypocritical TDS lunatics on here can totally ignore what their heroes tried to Trump…and then with a strait face they love to claim they love democracy

It took me two years of my life to prove the following: that a political party in the United States of America in the 21st century would go overseas and hire some bogus intelligence asset to manufacture fraudulent, fake, unverified information, funnel that to not just the intelligence community, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation," he said.

"And then take those packaged lies that they had paid for with campaign finance funds and go into a secret surveillance court and illegally spy on your opponent to be the president of the United States."

Our government and lying media is totally corrupt and infected

[UNI88]

[UNI88]

Colbert Hits Trump With Supercut Exposing The Lies About His Precious Ballroom

“Late Show” host Stephen Colbert exposed President Donald Trump’s repeated lies about his planned $400 million White House ballroom after Republicans included $1 billion for the project in their reconciliation package released on Monday.
...
“By the way, zero money spent by the government, zero,” Trump said in one clip.

“It’s all donations, rich people and people are putting up the money, zero taxpayer dollars,” he claimed in another.

“How ironic,” Colbert said. “To lie that blatantly takes a lot of balls. And he still hasn’t built the room to store them.”

[kalm]

Colbert Hits Trump With Supercut Exposing The Lies About His Precious Ballroom

“Late Show” host Stephen Colbert exposed President Donald Trump’s repeated lies about his planned $400 million White House ballroom after Republicans included $1 billion for the project in their reconciliation package released on Monday.
...
“By the way, zero money spent by the government, zero,” Trump said in one clip.

“It’s all donations, rich people and people are putting up the money, zero taxpayer dollars,” he claimed in another.

“How ironic,” Colbert said. “To lie that blatantly takes a lot of balls. And he still hasn’t built the room to store them.”

[UNI88]

Colbert Hits Trump With Supercut Exposing The Lies About His Precious Ballroom

[UNI88]

From Facebook ...

Now, for those of you who say people have TDS for criticizing Trump for bad policies and screwing up our country, let's take a look at real TDS.
(TDS) is often used as a rhetorical "get out of jail free" card—a way to dismiss any critique as irrational hysteria rather than engaging with the actual substance of the argument.

However, there is a compelling case to be made that the term has been flipped on its head. If "derangement" is defined as a break from reality or a loss of objective judgment, then the label may more accurately describe those who have abandoned their own lifelong principles to defend actions they would never tolerate in anyone else.

1. Criticism is Not "Derangement"—It’s Accountability
   To suggest that criticizing a president’s policy is a "syndrome" is to pathologize the very foundation of democracy. In a healthy republic, citizens are supposed to be skeptical of power.
   
   If a leader proposes tariffs that raise costs for working families, or alienates long-standing allies, questioning those moves isn't a mental lapse—it’s a civic duty.
   
   Supporters often claim critics hate Trump's "personality" rather than his policies. This ignores the reality that for many, the personality is the policy—erratic behavior, public insults, and disregard for institutional norms have tangible consequences for national security and social stability.
2. The Real TDS:
   The argument for flipping the definition of TDS rests on the idea that it is the defenders who exhibit symptoms of a "syndrome." This manifests as an inability to acknowledge any fault, no matter how documented or self-evident.

The Double Standard: Many who claim to value "fiscal conservatism" or "family values" often ignore record-high deficits or personal conduct that would have disqualified any other politician in their eyes. This selective blindness is a hallmark of true derangement—the sacrifice of a moral compass for the sake of a personality.

When a leader does exactly what his supporters previously complained about—such as increasing government spending, using executive orders to bypass Congress, or "playing golf on the taxpayer's dime"—and those supporters pivot to defend it, they are operating in a reality-free zone.

The most common defense mechanism for those truly "afflicted" is projection. By accusing critics of being "deranged," supporters avoid having to defend the actual incompetence or policy failures being discussed.

Deflection: When a valid criticism is raised about a specific policy failure, the response is often "What about [other politician]?" This shifts the focus from the current leader's competence to a perpetual state of grievance.

Real derangement is watching a leader fail to staff key government agencies or flip-flop on major national security issues, and then labeling that chaos as "4D chess."

So the question remains , Who is Actually "Deranged"?

The Critic (Accused of TDS) -

• Response to Policy: Analyzes outcomes and compares them to historical standards.
• Standard of Conduct: Expects the same decorum and ethics from all leaders.
• Relationship to Truth Relies on documented facts, data, and institutional records.
• Core Loyalty: loyal to the Constitution, the country, and personal principles.

The Defender (Actual TDS) -

• Response to Policy: Defends the leader regardless of the outcome or contradiction.
• Standard of Conduct: Excuses behavior they would condemn in a political opponent.
• Relationship to Truth: Relies on "alternative facts" or views any negative news as a "hoax."
• Core Loyalty: Loyal to the individual, even at the expense of previously held beliefs.

Ultimately, true "derangement" isn't found in those who demand excellence and accountability from the most powerful person in the world. It is found in those who have become so loyal to a single figure that they can no longer recognize when their own country—and their own values—are being undermined.

[kalm]

From Facebook ...

Now, for those of you who say people have TDS for criticizing Trump for bad policies and screwing up our country, let's take a look at real TDS.
(TDS) is often used as a rhetorical "get out of jail free" card—a way to dismiss any critique as irrational hysteria rather than engaging with the actual substance of the argument.

However, there is a compelling case to be made that the term has been flipped on its head. If "derangement" is defined as a break from reality or a loss of objective judgment, then the label may more accurately describe those who have abandoned their own lifelong principles to defend actions they would never tolerate in anyone else.

1. Criticism is Not "Derangement"—It’s Accountability
   To suggest that criticizing a president’s policy is a "syndrome" is to pathologize the very foundation of democracy. In a healthy republic, citizens are supposed to be skeptical of power.
   
   If a leader proposes tariffs that raise costs for working families, or alienates long-standing allies, questioning those moves isn't a mental lapse—it’s a civic duty.
   
   Supporters often claim critics hate Trump's "personality" rather than his policies. This ignores the reality that for many, the personality is the policy—erratic behavior, public insults, and disregard for institutional norms have tangible consequences for national security and social stability.
2. The Real TDS:
   The argument for flipping the definition of TDS rests on the idea that it is the defenders who exhibit symptoms of a "syndrome." This manifests as an inability to acknowledge any fault, no matter how documented or self-evident.

The Double Standard: Many who claim to value "fiscal conservatism" or "family values" often ignore record-high deficits or personal conduct that would have disqualified any other politician in their eyes. This selective blindness is a hallmark of true derangement—the sacrifice of a moral compass for the sake of a personality.

When a leader does exactly what his supporters previously complained about—such as increasing government spending, using executive orders to bypass Congress, or "playing golf on the taxpayer's dime"—and those supporters pivot to defend it, they are operating in a reality-free zone.

The most common defense mechanism for those truly "afflicted" is projection. By accusing critics of being "deranged," supporters avoid having to defend the actual incompetence or policy failures being discussed.

Deflection: When a valid criticism is raised about a specific policy failure, the response is often "What about [other politician]?" This shifts the focus from the current leader's competence to a perpetual state of grievance.

Real derangement is watching a leader fail to staff key government agencies or flip-flop on major national security issues, and then labeling that chaos as "4D chess."

So the question remains , Who is Actually "Deranged"?

The Critic (Accused of TDS) -

• Response to Policy: Analyzes outcomes and compares them to historical standards.
• Standard of Conduct: Expects the same decorum and ethics from all leaders.
• Relationship to Truth Relies on documented facts, data, and institutional records.
• Core Loyalty: loyal to the Constitution, the country, and personal principles.

The Defender (Actual TDS) -

• Response to Policy: Defends the leader regardless of the outcome or contradiction.
• Standard of Conduct: Excuses behavior they would condemn in a political opponent.
• Relationship to Truth: Relies on "alternative facts" or views any negative news as a "hoax."
• Core Loyalty: Loyal to the individual, even at the expense of previously held beliefs.

Ultimately, true "derangement" isn't found in those who demand excellence and accountability from the most powerful person in the world. It is found in those who have become so loyal to a single figure that they can no longer recognize when their own country—and their own values—are being undermined.

Mic drop.