Under our current system, the more wealth a company or an individual accumulates, the more power they acumulate and the greater their chances of increasing their piece of the pie. Three good examples of this would be the $5 billion Wall Street spent on lobbying during the Clinton and Bush administrations to deregulate the financial sector which we are now all paying for, or the untold billions spent in military funding over the past 50 years to insure stability in the Persian Gulf or the construction of public roads both of which greatly benefit big oil and big auto. I'm not saying these things are right or wrong, or that the public doesn't also benefit, but where would the oil companies and Wall Street be without massive government spending? And remember, Enron wasn't paying any taxes the last 5 years of its existence.
Historically, tax cuts on the wealthy and corporations tend to produce more lear jets, box seats, gambling in the financial markets and bubble economies while higher taxes force the weatlhy and coporations to reinvest in their business which helps sustain growth in the real economy. During the 1950's when the top marginal rate was 91% and corporations paid roughly 40% of federal tax revenues (vs. 10% today) we still had a lot of rich people and successful businesses, they just tended to have silver plated toilets instead of gold. And oh yeah, we were in the midst of the largest economic expansion and growth of the middle class in the history of the world.
But hey, if you googly eyed peasants prefer dynastic wealth and monopolies, if you prefer Mexico to Norway, that's your prerogative. Just remember that at the end of a game of monopoly there's only one winner and a whole bunch of losers.
