War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Political discussions
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by Chizzang »

In the 50's in the US we had the 80/20 rule.. and it worked about as expected...
20% of the people controlled about 80% of the money

today we have 95/5 rule... and it works not quote as well when even fewer individuals & families control an even larger percentage of the money

The single greatest trick ever pulled in this country (ever) was getting the middle class to redirect their hostility...
The 5% have successfully navigated the energies and focus of the middle class onto the poor
This fantastic maneuver has freed the 5% to fenagle about with impunity
Until this recent egregious miss-step by the 5%-ers we (as a culture) were not even paying attention

However: after the bailouts and golden parachutes and 8 digit bonuses in a failing economy they have again successfully redirected the attention and focus of the middle back onto the poor... like brilliant precision clock work

It's been fascinating to watch... :nod:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69119
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by kalm »

Chizzang wrote:In the 50's in the US we had the 80/20 rule.. and it worked about as expected...
20% of the people controlled about 80% of the money

today we have 95/5 rule... and it works not quote as well when even fewer individuals & families control an even larger percentage of the money

The single greatest trick ever pulled in this country (ever) was getting the middle class to redirect their hostility...
The 5% have successfully navigated the energies and focus of the middle class onto the poor
This fantastic maneuver has freed the 5% to fenagle about with impunity
Until this recent egregious miss-step by the 5%-ers we (as a culture) were not even paying attention

However: after the bailouts and golden parachutes and 8 digit bonuses in a failing economy they have again successfully redirected the attention and focus of the middle back onto the poor... like brilliant precision clock work

It's been fascinating to watch... :nod:
:nod: Exellent point!

Another example is unions who represent less than 10% of the workforce and who's finacial clout pales in comparison to large corporations. Yet they are the reason good paying jobs left our shores. :rofl:

Redistribution of wealth...up. :ohno:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by native »

Chizzang wrote:In the 50's in the US we had the 80/20 rule.. and it worked about as expected...
20% of the people controlled about 80% of the money

today we have 95/5 rule... and it works not quote as well when even fewer individuals & families control an even larger percentage of the money

The single greatest trick ever pulled in this country (ever) was getting the middle class to redirect their hostility...
The 5% have successfully navigated the energies and focus of the middle class onto the poor
This fantastic maneuver has freed the 5% to fenagle about with impunity
Until this recent egregious miss-step by the 5%-ers we (as a culture) were not even paying attention

However: after the bailouts and golden parachutes and 8 digit bonuses in a failing economy they have again successfully redirected the attention and focus of the middle back onto the poor... like brilliant precision clock work

It's been fascinating to watch... :nod:
I do not hate the poor. I do hate most of the political class, none of whom are poor. I also hate the actions of all the morons who aid and abet crime and undermine the Constitution.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by Chizzang »

native wrote:
Chizzang wrote:In the 50's in the US we had the 80/20 rule.. and it worked about as expected...
20% of the people controlled about 80% of the money

today we have 95/5 rule... and it works not quote as well when even fewer individuals & families control an even larger percentage of the money

The single greatest trick ever pulled in this country (ever) was getting the middle class to redirect their hostility...
The 5% have successfully navigated the energies and focus of the middle class onto the poor
This fantastic maneuver has freed the 5% to fenagle about with impunity
Until this recent egregious miss-step by the 5%-ers we (as a culture) were not even paying attention

However: after the bailouts and golden parachutes and 8 digit bonuses in a failing economy they have again successfully redirected the attention and focus of the middle back onto the poor... like brilliant precision clock work

It's been fascinating to watch... :nod:
I do not hate the poor. I do hate most of the political class, none of whom are poor. I also hate the actions of all the morons who aid and abet crime and undermine the Constitution.
I wasn't suggesting that you "hate the poor"
What I'm pointing out is that a HUGE percentage of the American middle class are focused on the poor - in fact obsessed with the poor - in America as the primary problem...
Somehow the American middle class has come to believe that the poor - which constitutes those in this country with the least amount of control and the lest access to the control mechanisms as the largest single economic issue

This of course is greeted with enthusiastic hilarity from the 5% who control 95% of the money and thus have a HUGE amount of access and HUGE amount of influence over the power structure...

:nod:

Again: One of the single greatest accomplishments of the wealthy elite in America is creating an environment where the Middle is obsessed with the bottom... and almost completely benign towards the top and what happens at the top and what the top does

it's AMAZING...

:coffee:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by native »

Chizzang wrote:
native wrote:
I do not hate the poor. I do hate most of the political class, none of whom are poor. I also hate the actions of all the morons who aid and abet crime and undermine the Constitution.
I wasn't suggesting that you "hate the poor"
What I'm pointing out is that a HUGE percentage of the American middle class are focused on the poor - in fact obsessed with the poor - in America as the primary problem...
Somehow the American middle class has come to believe that the poor - which constitutes those in this country with the least amount of control and the lest access to the control mechanisms as the largest single economic issue

This of course is greeted with enthusiastic hilarity from the 5% who control 95% of the money and thus have a HUGE amount of access and HUGE amount of influence over the power structure...

:nod:

Again: One of the single greatest accomplishments of the wealthy elite in America is creating an environment where the Middle is obsessed with the bottom... and almost completely benign towards the top and what happens at the top and what the top does

it's AMAZING...

:coffee:
Not sure I agree with your observations or conclusions but I apologize if you feel I was avoiding your point, Cleets. I am not obsessed with the poor, but I am obsessed with avoiding solutions that destroy opportunity and liberty.

If one of your points is that the checks and balances put into place by the founders have proven inadequate to some of the intended objectives of the Constitution, that point of view is certainly worth consideration.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by Chizzang »

native wrote:

Not sure I agree with your observations or conclusions but I apologize if you feel I was avoiding your point, Cleets. I am not obsessed with the poor, but I am obsessed with avoiding solutions that destroy opportunity and liberty.

If one of your points is that the checks and balances put into place by the founders have proven inadequate to some of the intended objectives of the Constitution, that point of view is certainly worth consideration.
Wow.. okay I guess Checks and Balances is the topic and not The War on Poverty
how about 62-5
where before it's passing in 1910 this country had many major parties in congress that properly represented their local constituency - after it's passing and ever since we've had 2 parties - Neither of which properly represents a huge portion of the population and both are controlled by Special interest and big corporations far beyond the influence of their local voting block...

:coffee:

Not even close to what the fathers intended
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by native »

Chizzang wrote:
native wrote:

Not sure I agree with your observations or conclusions but I apologize if you feel I was avoiding your point, Cleets. I am not obsessed with the poor, but I am obsessed with avoiding solutions that destroy opportunity and liberty.

If one of your points is that the checks and balances put into place by the founders have proven inadequate to some of the intended objectives of the Constitution, that point of view is certainly worth consideration.
Wow.. okay I guess Checks and Balances is the topic and not The War on Poverty
how about 62-5
where before it's passing in 1910 this country had many major parties in congress that properly represented their local constituency - after it's passing and ever since we've had 2 parties - Neither of which properly represents a huge portion of the population and both are controlled by Special interest and big corporations far beyond the influence of their local voting block...

:coffee:

Not even close to what the fathers intended
The founders did not anticipate political parties. But they crafted the Constitution with the intention to prevent large unchecked accumulations of tyrannical power. Our Constitution has been the most effective tool ever invented for this purpose.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19274
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Palermo Italy

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by Chizzang »

native wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
Wow.. okay I guess Checks and Balances is the topic and not The War on Poverty
how about 62-5
where before it's passing in 1910 this country had many major parties in congress that properly represented their local constituency - after it's passing and ever since we've had 2 parties - Neither of which properly represents a huge portion of the population and both are controlled by Special interest and big corporations far beyond the influence of their local voting block...

:coffee:

Not even close to what the fathers intended
The founders did not anticipate political parties. But they crafted the Constitution with the intention to prevent large unchecked accumulations of tyrannical power. Our Constitution has been the most effective tool ever invented for this purpose.
Really..
I thought revolution was the most effective tool for removing excessive power..?

I wonder what the founders thought about lobby and special interest and about big business running the Federal Government... as well as the Federal Reserve system that steals from its citizens

I guess as long as it's constitutional
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by native »

Chizzang wrote:
native wrote:
The founders did not anticipate political parties. But they crafted the Constitution with the intention to prevent large unchecked accumulations of tyrannical power. Our Constitution has been the most effective tool ever invented for this purpose.
Really..
I thought revolution was the most effective tool for removing excessive power..?

I wonder what the founders thought about lobby and special interest and about big business running the Federal Government... as well as the Federal Reserve system that steals from its citizens

I guess as long as it's constitutional
I did not claim that the Constitution is effective or was intended as a tool for "removing excessive power," rather that it was intended to "prevent large unchecked accumulations of tyrannical power." I would agree with you that revolution is probably the most effective tool for removing excessive power.

Lobbyists and special interests have been around forever. The Constitution was specifically engineered to balance such special interests out.

I agree that many of the founders would probably be horrified by the Federal Reserve.

This is basic civics and history 101 that you already know. What is it you really want to argue about? Do you want me to admit that my precious Constitution has failed to provide sufficient checks and balances as intended? In some cases that is pretty obvious. Yet, it has succeeded for more than 200 years to a greater extent than any other known solution.
Last edited by native on Sun May 02, 2010 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by native »

blueballs wrote: ...Another thing.... ALL governmental assistance like welfare, food stamps, section 8 housing, etc. should bring with it mandatory drug testing and birth control for all recipients.
:thumb: :thumb:
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by JMU DJ »

native wrote:
blueballs wrote: ...Another thing.... ALL governmental assistance like welfare, food stamps, section 8 housing, etc. should bring with it mandatory drug testing and birth control for all recipients.
:thumb: :thumb:
:rofl:

I always like hearing this argument. I understand the concept, make the regulations stricter to obtain government assistance and reduce abuse by those milking the system... but then I always think about the people who complain about wasteful government spending, who use this as their argument. How much would you be willing to allow the government to spend on drug test before you started complaining about that too? What are you going to screen for? Are you going to use urine, blood, hair? Are you going to test every month? Who's going to do the testing and will they offer a competitive contract? Testing cost aside, how much will we have to pay for the people who are administering the test? It can get pretty pricey. Do we violate civil rights by demanding that those receiving benefits also take birth control?

"You mean now I have to support those do nothing drug addicts AND pay for their birth control/drug test!"


In hard times, Americans blame the poor

Steve Raiken, 45, a former mechanic who fell on hard times and is now on welfare with his wife and two children in Gloucester City, said harsh talk against the poor "doesn't bother me a bit. I don't worry what people say. I've got enough problems."

But Raiken, who spends his days volunteering at a local food pantry, did say he believed that those who criticize welfare might not fully understand it.

Experts agree.

Welfare rolls are down around 60 percent since the mid-1990s, when welfare was switched from an entitlement to a work program that requires recipients to have jobs, said Ron Haskins, who drafted the so-called welfare-reform bill of 1996 as the Republican staff director of the U.S. House Ways and Means committee.

In Pennsylvania, enrollment in welfare (now known as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) dropped from 486,985 in 1996 to 217,820 last December, with 75 percent of the recipients children, according to the Pennsylvania Budget and Policy Center. In New Jersey, TANF rolls fell from 91,364 in 1997 to 36,738 in 2009, state officials said. Throughout the country, around 4 million people are on welfare, government figures show.

"It's not a way of life," said Kathryn Edin, a Harvard University poverty expert who lived two years in Camden.

Despite belief to the contrary, welfare is a small payout that's difficult to attain, experts say. "You only get TANF if you're poor, poor, poor," said Linda Blanchette, deputy secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. "A mother and two kids get around $403 a month. You have to work or be in job training 30 hours a week, and there's a five-year limit. Who wants this?"

There is, some say, a deep American anger toward the poor for violating the near-sacred belief that all people can pull themselves up by their bootstraps. It's connected to a notion, rooted in Puritanism, "that the poor must have done something wrong because they weren't blessed by the heavens, as the prosperous are," Blanchette said.

Michael Geer, president of the conservative Pennsylvania Family Institute in Harrisburg, doesn't disagree: "Taxpayers who have money taken from them end up with a sense of disgust with people receiving the help," he said.

Some also believe that many welfare recipients cheat.

"The myth of the Cadillac-driving welfare queen" who defrauds the system lingers even though there's no proof of it, said Erin O'Brien, a poverty expert at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.

In fact, welfare fraud among Philadelphia's 95,456 recipients is "minute," according to Peter Berson, assistant chief of the government fraud unit in the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office.

The 200 to 400 cases of welfare fraud in the city each year - down 50 percent since 2002 because of better enforcement and fewer recipients - are not nonworking women having babies to game the government, but working women receiving welfare and working at other jobs without reporting the income, Berson said.
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homep ... ?viewAll=y" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by AZGrizFan »

JMU DJ wrote: I always like hearing this argument. I understand the concept, make the regulations stricter to obtain government assistance and reduce abuse by those milking the system... but then I always think about the people who complain about wasteful government spending, who use this as their argument. How much would you be willing to allow the government to spend on drug test before you started complaining about that too? What are you going to screen for? Are you going to use urine, blood, hair? Are you going to test every month? Who's going to do the testing and will they offer a competitive contract? Testing cost aside, how much will we have to pay for the people who are administering the test? It can get pretty pricey. Do we violate civil rights by demanding that those receiving benefits also take birth control?
Translation: Fuck it. There's some really difficult things to figure out and we don't have the intelligence, so we'll just continue to leave the vault door open and let people take as much as they want.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by JMU DJ »

AZGrizFan wrote:
JMU DJ wrote: I always like hearing this argument. I understand the concept, make the regulations stricter to obtain government assistance and reduce abuse by those milking the system... but then I always think about the people who complain about wasteful government spending, who use this as their argument. How much would you be willing to allow the government to spend on drug test before you started complaining about that too? What are you going to screen for? Are you going to use urine, blood, hair? Are you going to test every month? Who's going to do the testing and will they offer a competitive contract? Testing cost aside, how much will we have to pay for the people who are administering the test? It can get pretty pricey. Do we violate civil rights by demanding that those receiving benefits also take birth control?
Translation: Fuck it. There's some really difficult things to figure out and we don't have the intelligence, so we'll just continue to leave the vault door open and let people take as much as they want.
:lol: :roll:

Those are your words Z. What do you propose o' sage one? You complain about wasteful spending and then want to spend more to stop the wasteful spending. Yeah, that makes sense. :blink:


Weren't you just preaching about social responsibilities recently?
Image
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by native »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Translation: **** it. There's some really difficult things to figure out and we don't have the intelligence, so we'll just continue to leave the vault door open and let people take as much as they want.
:lol: :roll:

Those are your words Z. What do you propose o' sage one? You complain about wasteful spending and then want to spend more to stop the wasteful spending. Yeah, that makes sense. :blink:


Weren't you just preaching about social responsibilities recently?
Management controls do not have to be inefficient, young 'un.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
catamount man
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2608
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:17 pm

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by catamount man »

that Jesus fella even said "The poor you will always have with you". Kinda pretty much tells me it ain't going away but then again liberals don't like that Jesus fella because he wouldn't approve of their hedonistic love of self. :thumb:
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by JMU DJ »

native wrote:
JMU DJ wrote:
:lol: :roll:

Those are your words Z. What do you propose o' sage one? You complain about wasteful spending and then want to spend more to stop the wasteful spending. Yeah, that makes sense. :blink:


Weren't you just preaching about social responsibilities recently?
Management controls do not have to be inefficient, young 'un.

No doubt. In this case though, it will be. A few states have already cited the inefficacy and extraordinary cost of implementing a drug testing system. I'm unaware of any exact statistics on the number of drug users (I've read between 6-37% depending on which source you go to) obtaining government benefits, but my guess would be that you'd be spending more money testing people over time than you would get back by eliminating those who use drugs. Also, I'm pretty sure there's precedence for this being unconstitutional per the 4th Amendment. See Michigan enforcement of drug testing (Marchwinski v. Howard), only 10% tested positive there... yet you spend money continually testing the other 90% too. I've read something before that drug testing cost employers around $20,000 to find one person who is using drugs.

It'd be interesting to see how something like this would hold up on a national scale.
Image
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by native »

JMU DJ wrote:
native wrote:
Management controls do not have to be inefficient, young 'un.

No doubt. In this case though, it will be. A few states have already cited the inefficacy and extraordinary cost of implementing a drug testing system. I'm unaware of any exact statistics on the number of drug users (I've read between 6-37% depending on which source you go to) obtaining government benefits, but my guess would be that you'd be spending more money testing people over time than you would get back by eliminating those who use drugs. Also, I'm pretty sure there's precedence for this being unconstitutional per the 4th Amendment. See Michigan enforcement of drug testing (Marchwinski v. Howard), only 10% tested positive there... yet you spend money continually testing the other 90% too. I've read something before that drug testing cost employers around $20,000 to find one person who is using drugs.

It'd be interesting to see how something like this would hold up on a national scale.
The program would not have to be a system of 100% positive control as in the Michigan case. Both random testing and probable cause testing could work, as long we had the courage to stick with punitive measures for fraud.
Last edited by native on Mon May 03, 2010 12:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by AZGrizFan »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Translation: Fuck it. There's some really difficult things to figure out and we don't have the intelligence, so we'll just continue to leave the vault door open and let people take as much as they want.

:lol: :roll:

Those are your words Z. What do you propose o' sage one? You complain about wasteful spending and then want to spend more to stop the wasteful spending. Yeah, that makes sense. :blink:


Weren't you just preaching about social responsibilities recently?
You're right those are my words. But it's exactly what you sound like when you make statements like that. So, because the government is inefficient by nature, it gets a pass at being required to eliminate fraud and waste. That's quite the irony, wouldn't you say? :lol: :lol:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by JMU DJ »

AZGrizFan wrote: You're right those are my words. But it's exactly what you sound like when you make statements like that. So, because the government is inefficient by nature, it gets a pass at being required to eliminate fraud and waste. That's quite the irony, wouldn't you say? :lol: :lol:

Z, you're misinterpreting the statement. First off, there's waste and something should be done about it... like I said earlier. But what do we do? I agree with you, Fuck it! I don't have the intelligence to figure it out. :lol: But if you believe drug testing is the way to go to solve this problem, then I've got a Universal Health Care Plan with zero cost to taxpayers and some property on the Moon with a view of the Sun... if you're in the market that is.

I've never said they government should not be actively trying to reduce fraud and waste in these programs. The point again, is that for a group of people who complain about government spending and waste, you sure do seem eager to throw money at the money problem. Like I said, I'd be interested to see how this would work on a national scale, but I'd also expect to hear outcry about it based on the spending, from the same people who asked for it. Isn't that the point of your thread? We've thrown all this money at poverty, trying to make government programs better, trying to make living situations better, and it's done nothing... yet, implementing more spending for drug testing will solve that problem?
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by AZGrizFan »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: You're right those are my words. But it's exactly what you sound like when you make statements like that. So, because the government is inefficient by nature, it gets a pass at being required to eliminate fraud and waste. That's quite the irony, wouldn't you say? :lol: :lol:

Z, you're misinterpreting the statement. First off, there's waste and something should be done about it... like I said earlier. But what do we do? I agree with you, Fuck it! I don't have the intelligence to figure it out. :lol: But if you believe drug testing is the way to go to solve this problem, then I've got a Universal Health Care Plan with zero cost to taxpayers and some property on the Moon with a view of the Sun... if you're in the market that is.

I've never said they government should not be actively trying to reduce fraud and waste in these programs. The point again, is that for a group of people who complain about government spending and waste, you sure do seem eager to throw money at the money problem. Like I said, I'd be interested to see how this would work on a national scale, but I'd also expect to hear outcry about it based on the spending, from the same people who asked for it. Isn't that the point of your thread? We've thrown all this money at poverty, trying to make government programs better, trying to make living situations better, and it's done nothing... yet, implementing more spending for drug testing will solve that problem?
I've got a solution: put time limits on EVERY entitlement program. I'm not a fan of ANY of them. Then even if there WAS waste, it'd have a limited effect based on that person's time in whatever program they're raping.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by JMU DJ »

AZGrizFan wrote:
I've got a solution: put time limits on EVERY entitlement program. I'm not a fan of ANY of them. Then even if there WAS waste, it'd have a limited effect based on that person's time in whatever program they're raping.

I thought states TANF programs had time limits? Seemed like the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 did some good right? Besides, isn't most of the government money spent on children? Think of the children Z.

Image

... think of those drug abusing children. ;)
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by AZGrizFan »

Think of the birth control.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by D1B »

AZGrizFan wrote:
JMU DJ wrote:

Z, you're misinterpreting the statement. First off, there's waste and something should be done about it... like I said earlier. But what do we do? I agree with you, Fuck it! I don't have the intelligence to figure it out. :lol: But if you believe drug testing is the way to go to solve this problem, then I've got a Universal Health Care Plan with zero cost to taxpayers and some property on the Moon with a view of the Sun... if you're in the market that is.

I've never said they government should not be actively trying to reduce fraud and waste in these programs. The point again, is that for a group of people who complain about government spending and waste, you sure do seem eager to throw money at the money problem. Like I said, I'd be interested to see how this would work on a national scale, but I'd also expect to hear outcry about it based on the spending, from the same people who asked for it. Isn't that the point of your thread? We've thrown all this money at poverty, trying to make government programs better, trying to make living situations better, and it's done nothing... yet, implementing more spending for drug testing will solve that problem?
I've got a solution: put time limits on EVERY entitlement program. I'm not a fan of ANY of them. Then even if there WAS waste, it'd have a limited effect based on that person's time in whatever program they're raping.

Hey Einstein, what about you? Aint you the product of our largest welfare program - the military? Talk about a collossal waste of money and without a doubt little more than a homeless diversion program for losers and misfits. :nod:
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: War On Poverty: Another Donk Failure

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

If your going to waste money waste it on defense of this country.


And then there is D1B taking shots at the homeless how sad..............................
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
Post Reply