I have no dog in this fight but ya know what? I'm still following and watching the playoffs and have a team I want to win in every game. So back off. No need to even bring TXST up on this thread. I could have but since it's moot, I didn't bother.
When it come to the playoffs, you usually don't.
And lighten up. If you want to make fun of bad CAA playoff football, you gotta be ready for a response. It's all in fun.
UNH has figured out how to pass block, but they still can't get open against the UD secondary. UNH needs to establish a run to open up the their passing.
Should either team face GSU, their pass protection better get better real quick. GSU's DL is much better than either of these are, and both QBs are taking a beating.
CatMom wrote:It ain't bad BH, it's ugly. There's a difference. I'd rather see ugly than bad. (which I'm kinda used to)
I saw some people talking about dropped passes, there have been a couple but certainly no more than in any other game. Shit Devlin is 20 of 28 so it can't be that bad. I guess playing good defense just ain't pretty or what exactly are y'all talking about?
So they keep showing this ad about the Capital One Cup. Now, will they give more points to the faux BCS champion than the actual NCAA D1 champion? (or doesn't that count cause it might knock out one of the 'big boys?)
Is it wrong that I don't like a woman doing play by play
How cold is it?...VP Bidden looked bundled up.
Why empty seats...final week...cold?
Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair or fucking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. Al Swearengen http://www.whirligig-tv.co.uk/tv/childr ... bronco.wav" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Ursus, my def of what winning ugly is may differ from someone else's. It's not a bad thing and I'm not prone to try and explain it. It does include QB sacks. It has nothing to do with the QB completion ratio though.
It would take me too long to explain and I'd probably make a mess of it anyway.
Don't think the game has been all that ugly, but I can tell you that whoever wins this game will face the best offense that they have faced all year in the semis. The CAA offenses have made the CAA defenses look better than they really are.
GSU lent credence to that against W&M and IMO App. State will also do it tomorrow against Nova.
Pwns wrote:Don't think the game has been all that ugly, but I can tell you that whoever wins this game will face the best offense that they have faced all year in the semis. The CAA offenses have made the CAA defenses look better than they really are.
GSU lent credence to that against W&M and IMO App. State will also do it tomorrow against Nova.
Maybe. It's equally likely that the winner of Wofford - GSU will face the best defense they have seen all year.
Pwns wrote:Don't think the game has been all that ugly, but I can tell you that whoever wins this game will face the best offense that they have faced all year in the semis. The CAA offenses have made the CAA defenses look better than they really are.
GSU lent credence to that against W&M and IMO App. State will also do it tomorrow against Nova.
Maybe. It's equally likely that the winner of Wofford - GSU will face the best defense they have seen all year.
And you can't say who will win but whoever wins will say "see I told you" even though that defense may have held them to a much lower score and yardage total than anyone in their conference did.
Nova isn't ranked above 4 or 5 in the CAA for defense are they? Even with that I bet App is gonna have trouble moving on them and Nova is gonna find moving the ball easier than they have all year.
