Really, I'm thinking the exact same of you.JoltinJoe wrote:youngterrier wrote: In a literal context, it does. It may not explicitly say the equation or the number of which to reach a circle, but if used in literal context it undeniably implies contradictions to our understanding of reality in the numerical value of pi or the equations of which we find the numerical value of circles. Just as in a literal context if one reads the book of genesis one can conclude that the bible says that the world was created in 6 literal days, one can conclude that pi=3 or that the equations to find circles is C=3D.
You remind me of a student I have this semester. Says something wrong in class, is politely shown his mistake but refuses to give up, then gets smart-alecky. And the only way to shut up him is to embarrass him.
Your failure to answer my question of earlier is fortified evidence of that fact at this point.