dbackjon wrote:T-man,
The problem with your posts, besides the encyclopedic length, is the attacking tone, which leads any reasonable person to reject the whole hysterical nature of them.
Try posting them as separate posts, without calling names, using the word fascism, and then expect a reasonable debate.
But with your current format, it is "YAWN" same old irrational shit.
Dbackjon,
The problem with your responses, besides their nonsensical structure, is their failure to take responsibility for YOUR party's malfeasance: Anytime. For Anything.
Try accepting responsibilty for errant choices driven by single issue political agendas, not applying a "gay rights" or "pro choice" litmus to every issue, and making an attempt to understand the concept of a "constitution" (hell, just look up the definition of the word "constitution"...you may learn enough just from that...). Attempting to outsmart the framers as a method of furthering a progressive idea is both structurally reckless and potentially destructive to the whole.
But with your current posture, it is "YAWN", unenlightened and the same old thoughtless response.
And on a personal note, part of the problem our country is facing the problems we are is society has begun to demand information in soundbites, as you have illustrated (as well as D1B and Appa in the past). If you are incapable of processing more than two paragraphs or 30 seconds of verbiage on any issue, then maybe you should reserve comment on those issues to people who have developed the discipline, and understand the need to, express complex thoughts in a manner beyond what you've expectingly become conditioned to accept by MSM.
