SDHornet wrote:Baldy wrote:
KoolAid? Sounds more like cyanide.
No kidding. Same financial vodoo math was spewed by the WAC posted saying how awesome it is to be in a bottom tier FBS conference and how way better it is than FCS. I have no idea how the financials work out favorably.
![#jack :jack:](./images/smilies/jack.gif)
The thing is ... they never showed
any voodoo math
The Appalachian FBS study was "privately funded" (likely, primarily by a trustee who is a big football booster). If they have released any $$$ numbers, I've never seen them.
It ain't *rocket medicine* I can understand the lack of specifics or exacting detail, but there was
nothing (other than ""Trust Us"").
When you start playing with some numbers on either side of the ledger, it's easy to see where the Sunbelt (with BCS share and potential TV monies, etc) just will not work even with the **enhanced ticket revenues and corporate sponsorships** that could be expected.
And the State of North Carolina (more specifically, the Generous Assembly) threw one Heck of a monkey wrench into the works by dumping "tuition waivers" in 2011.
In 2005, the Educational Foundation (or Rams Club) in Chapel Hill convinced the General Assembly that all athletes in the University system should only 'pay' in-state tuition regardless of their home state (this saved the Rams Club millions of dollars as they fund all athletic grants-in-aid at UNC).
They claimed this would not cost *taxpayers* any dollars (that was BS) and would only effect University operating budgets from the tuition hits. As the Generous Assembly was slashing higher education budgets during the recession, folks rightfully pointed out that the tuition waivers were costing the 16-member institutions millions of dollars each year in revenues. So, they were dumped.
If you fiddle with the Hillbilly numbers and factor in a move to FBS, this is likely more than half a million dollars a year.
Ooops.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)