Skjellyfetti wrote:
Armanti's career isn't over. His legacy is riding on how he does tomorrow and (hopefully) in the championship game.
If he wins tomorrow he'll have as many playoff wins as any QB in FCS history. If he wins another championship he'll have more championships than any other QB. Comparing him to Jerry Rice or Steve McNair is entirely subjective... but, if he wins the championships he'd be the best ever imo.
Quarterbacks don't win championships, teams do. The notion that Edwards alone won those playoff games is absurd; he's just one guy out of many. Armanti won titles because he was on the best team, not necessarily because he may have been the best player. McNair & Rice never really had the chance to win titles because they played on weaker SWAC teams. Edwards is an excellent player, but—from what I've seen—he doesn't quite have the overall ability of Jerry Rice (best receiver of all time), Steve McNair (all-time leader in FCS offense), or Dave Dickenson (among the best FCS QBs in multiple efficiency statisitics despite throwing the ball most every down; highest rated passer in the history of the CFL).
The argument works for the Griz, too. A lot of UM fans seem to think John Edwards was an awesome QB just because he won a lot of games (and a title) as a starting QB. Look at the stats, though, & you'll see he wasn't much better than average. Cole Bergquist, Drew Miller, Brian Ah Yat, Craig Ochs, & Andrew Selle were/are all better than Edwards, it's just that their teams didn't get quite get the job done while Edwards's team (mostly his defense) did. Now, of course, Armanti Edwards is a lot better than John Edwards, but to heavily judge a QB's ability on how many titles he won is stupid.