Sudfeld - broken wrist
Kessler - concussion
Thorson - sucks
Wentz - hasn't suited up in two games

NFL pundit chatter says the Eagles release Sudfeld before game one of the regular season93henfan wrote:Eagles sign Josh McCown out of retirement so they can finish the preseason.
Sudfeld - broken wrist
Kessler - concussion
Thorson - sucks
Wentz - hasn't suited up in two games

NFL pundit chatter is stupid. Kessler is going to get the boot, Thorson will be put on the practice squad if they think they can sneak him onto it, and Sudfeld is the clear #2 QB and will be back to that spot by week #3. The idea is to never have McCown take an actual snap in a game the whole year. That's what you hope from your #3 QB.Chizzang wrote:NFL pundit chatter says the Eagles release Sudfeld before game one of the regular season93henfan wrote:Eagles sign Josh McCown out of retirement so they can finish the preseason.
Sudfeld - broken wrist
Kessler - concussion
Thorson - sucks
Wentz - hasn't suited up in two games
and keep Josh McCown


McCown looked OK last night: 2 TDS, no picks. Eagles sleepwalked through another exhibition loss, but no real worries. Pass rush has to improve.GannonFan wrote:NFL pundit chatter is stupid. Kessler is going to get the boot, Thorson will be put on the practice squad if they think they can sneak him onto it, and Sudfeld is the clear #2 QB and will be back to that spot by week #3. The idea is to never have McCown take an actual snap in a game the whole year. That's what you hope from your #3 QB.Chizzang wrote:
NFL pundit chatter says the Eagles release Sudfeld before game one of the regular season
and keep Josh McCown

First team offensive players looked fine. Kessler had his last chance last night and he looked terrible, so he'll be off the roster soon. Haven't really played the starters on defense yet but the second team looks good. Team looks real good to me, stay healthy and winning another Super Bowl is very realistic. Long way to there from here, but so far so good.Ivytalk wrote:McCown looked OK last night: 2 TDS, no picks. Eagles sleepwalked through another exhibition loss, but no real worries. Pass rush has to improve.GannonFan wrote:
NFL pundit chatter is stupid. Kessler is going to get the boot, Thorson will be put on the practice squad if they think they can sneak him onto it, and Sudfeld is the clear #2 QB and will be back to that spot by week #3. The idea is to never have McCown take an actual snap in a game the whole year. That's what you hope from your #3 QB.
The O-line is ridiculously good. Vaitai is vastly improved, Peters is now 100% on the knee (it takes 18 months), Mailata appears to have learned the game, and the 1st round pick Dillard looks great. I only saw one mistake from him so far, and that was missing a blitz early last week against Jax. Carson should be lighting up the board this year. Can't wait for the regular season. The O should be able to overcome any issues with the D, and the D ain't bad. Maybe make a pitch for Clowney with one of the spare o-linemen and maybe a 3rd rd pick. Not sure if HOU is that desperate though, but you have to start somewhere. HOU wants something for him before he walks next year.GannonFan wrote:First team offensive players looked fine. Kessler had his last chance last night and he looked terrible, so he'll be off the roster soon. Haven't really played the starters on defense yet but the second team looks good. Team looks real good to me, stay healthy and winning another Super Bowl is very realistic. Long way to there from here, but so far so good.Ivytalk wrote:
McCown looked OK last night: 2 TDS, no picks. Eagles sleepwalked through another exhibition loss, but no real worries. Pass rush has to improve.

As of August 3rd the Texans had $40 Mil in cap space93henfan wrote:The O-line is ridiculously good. Vaitai is vastly improved, Peters is now 100% on the knee (it takes 18 months), Mailata appears to have learned the game, and the 1st round pick Dillard looks great. I only saw one mistake from him so far, and that was missing a blitz early last week against Jax. Carson should be lighting up the board this year. Can't wait for the regular season. The O should be able to overcome any issues with the D, and the D ain't bad. Maybe make a pitch for Clowney with one of the spare o-linemen and maybe a 3rd rd pick. Not sure if HOU is that desperate though, but you have to start somewhere. HOU wants something for him before he walks next year.GannonFan wrote:
First team offensive players looked fine. Kessler had his last chance last night and he looked terrible, so he'll be off the roster soon. Haven't really played the starters on defense yet but the second team looks good. Team looks real good to me, stay healthy and winning another Super Bowl is very realistic. Long way to there from here, but so far so good.
A one-year rental isn't overpaying. That's all the Eagles would be looking for. Of course, the same situation with Golden Taint really didn't produce much, so Howie may pass.Chizzang wrote:As of August 3rd the Texans had $40 Mil in cap space93henfan wrote:
The O-line is ridiculously good. Vaitai is vastly improved, Peters is now 100% on the knee (it takes 18 months), Mailata appears to have learned the game, and the 1st round pick Dillard looks great. I only saw one mistake from him so far, and that was missing a blitz early last week against Jax. Carson should be lighting up the board this year. Can't wait for the regular season. The O should be able to overcome any issues with the D, and the D ain't bad. Maybe make a pitch for Clowney with one of the spare o-linemen and maybe a 3rd rd pick. Not sure if HOU is that desperate though, but you have to start somewhere. HOU wants something for him before he walks next year.
and JJ Watt is looking older by the hour
Only 4 teams in the NFL right now have the cap space for Clown-Show
and he's presently on one of them...
Clown goes to the Colts if the trade gets serious
They've got the cash and the picks and are dumb enough to over pay for a guy like that

I have no doubt that Howie could pants the Texans... who presently have no GM93henfan wrote:A one-year rental isn't overpaying. That's all the Eagles would be looking for. Of course, the same situation with Golden Taint really didn't produce much, so Howie may pass.Chizzang wrote:
As of August 3rd the Texans had $40 Mil in cap space
and JJ Watt is looking older by the hour
Only 4 teams in the NFL right now have the cap space for Clown-Show
and he's presently on one of them...
Clown goes to the Colts if the trade gets serious
They've got the cash and the picks and are dumb enough to over pay for a guy like that

They drafted a pretty darn good QB this past draft..!!93henfan wrote:Two quick points:
1. Anyone wondering why the Eagles aren't playing Wentz all preseason, see Cam Newton's mid-foot sprain last night.
2. What the fuck is Cam Newton wearing? Is he a switch-hitter?

I have no problem with preseason games if the owners agree to charge $15 for tickets and $5 for parking, because that's about right for the caliber of entertainment a preseason game provides.css75 wrote:Last night may have been the death knell for 4 pre season games. Games on 80 yard field, ending early and a QB injury show how big of a joke it is.
Go to 2 preseason games, add 2 playoff wildcard games and 17 regular season games with 17 th being on neutral field. Also have 2 bye weeks, problem solved.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That's all well and good but completely avoids the economic point. Some fool who paid $110 for a preseason ticket to Ravens @ Eagles for week 3 probably wanted to see about a quarter of Carson Wentz and a quarter of Lamar Jackson, but no team except the Carolina Panthers (and a couple more who are stupid) are playing their starting QB at all. It's asinine to charge full price for an exhibition where the biggest star isn't exhibited. I don't blame the teams for sitting their franchise arm the entire preseason, but don't require people to purchase those two farcical games.Chizzang wrote:Preseason is important for teams that actually know how to build roster depth...
Teams that wildly over pay for players and that have no depth and no development system
sure enough - they don't like preseason or even know how to use preseason

Not necessarily93henfan wrote:That's all well and good but completely avoids the economic point. Some fool who paid $110 for a preseason ticket to Ravens @ Eagles for week 3 probably wanted to see about a quarter of Carson Wentz and a quarter of Lamar Jackson, but no team except the Carolina Panthers (and a couple more who are stupid) are playing their starting QB at all. It's asinine to charge full price for an exhibition where the biggest star isn't exhibited. I don't blame the teams for sitting their franchise arm the entire preseason, but don't require people to purchase those two farcical games.Chizzang wrote:Preseason is important for teams that actually know how to build roster depth...
Teams that wildly over pay for players and that have no depth and no development system
sure enough - they don't like preseason or even know how to use preseason
The unwritten formula used to be:
Preseason gm 1: Play starting QB one or two series.
Gm 2: a quarter
Gm 3: a half
Gm 4: rest or one series
Now it's:
Starting QB sees first action in regular season
The Ravens and Eagles, for the past two seasons, have developed a model the league could follow for each week of the preseason. The visitor flies (or trains) to the home team's practice facility about five days before the game. They scrimmage three days with QBs in red shirts and no tackling to the ground. Then they play on day 5.Chizzang wrote:Not necessarily93henfan wrote:
That's all well and good but completely avoids the economic point. Some fool who paid $110 for a preseason ticket to Ravens @ Eagles for week 3 probably wanted to see about a quarter of Carson Wentz and a quarter of Lamar Jackson, but no team except the Carolina Panthers (and a couple more who are stupid) are playing their starting QB at all. It's asinine to charge full price for an exhibition where the biggest star isn't exhibited. I don't blame the teams for sitting their franchise arm the entire preseason, but don't require people to purchase those two farcical games.
The unwritten formula used to be:
Preseason gm 1: Play starting QB one or two series.
Gm 2: a quarter
Gm 3: a half
Gm 4: rest or one series
Now it's:
Starting QB sees first action in regular season
Patrick Mahomes has taken over 60 snaps with the 1st team this preseason
Just depends on the organization
The teams with china dolls at QB are smart to sit their key guys
there are no promises made to fans dumb enough to pay actual money for preseason tickets
But teams that know how to develop depth need 4 preseason games
this idea that teams don;t need 4 games not accurate

You do realize that season ticket holders must also buy preseason games at full price? I guess you could call them dumb but that's the price to pay to get season tickets.Chizzang wrote:Not necessarily93henfan wrote:
That's all well and good but completely avoids the economic point. Some fool who paid $110 for a preseason ticket to Ravens @ Eagles for week 3 probably wanted to see about a quarter of Carson Wentz and a quarter of Lamar Jackson, but no team except the Carolina Panthers (and a couple more who are stupid) are playing their starting QB at all. It's asinine to charge full price for an exhibition where the biggest star isn't exhibited. I don't blame the teams for sitting their franchise arm the entire preseason, but don't require people to purchase those two farcical games.
The unwritten formula used to be:
Preseason gm 1: Play starting QB one or two series.
Gm 2: a quarter
Gm 3: a half
Gm 4: rest or one series
Now it's:
Starting QB sees first action in regular season
Patrick Mahomes has taken over 60 snaps with the 1st team this preseason
Just depends on the organization
The teams with china dolls at QB are smart to sit their key guys
there are no promises made to fans dumb enough to pay actual money for preseason tickets
But teams that know how to develop depth need 4 preseason games
this idea that teams don;t need 4 games not accurate

Crazy mental gymnastics..?GannonFan wrote:You do realize that season ticket holders must also buy preseason games at full price? I guess you could call them dumb but that's the price to pay to get season tickets.Chizzang wrote:
Not necessarily
Patrick Mahomes has taken over 60 snaps with the 1st team this preseason
Just depends on the organization
The teams with china dolls at QB are smart to sit their key guys
there are no promises made to fans dumb enough to pay actual money for preseason tickets
But teams that know how to develop depth need 4 preseason games
this idea that teams don;t need 4 games not accurate
And really, you're doing some crazy mental gymnastics here just to carry your point that some QB's have had injury histories and some haven't. Not sure why you have to hide that point while wrapping yourself around the false narrative that 4 preseason games are vital.

There's a big difference between 2 and 4 preseason games, with you just a few posts ago advocating the latter (and now you seem to be swinging back to the lower number).Chizzang wrote:Crazy mental gymnastics..?GannonFan wrote:
You do realize that season ticket holders must also buy preseason games at full price? I guess you could call them dumb but that's the price to pay to get season tickets.
And really, you're doing some crazy mental gymnastics here just to carry your point that some QB's have had injury histories and some haven't. Not sure why you have to hide that point while wrapping yourself around the false narrative that 4 preseason games are vital.
young player development is worth 2 preseason games for sure
the rest of it can be debated...
the new coaches running new systems and evaluating their team
want the games - it's going to be a hard decision - there's just enough support for it to make it tricky
And most teams have lowered the ticket prices on preseason games

There's enough support for 4 games that it'll be hard to reduce the number of gamesGannonFan wrote:There's a big difference between 2 and 4 preseason games, with you just a few posts ago advocating the latter (and now you seem to be swinging back to the lower number).Chizzang wrote:
Crazy mental gymnastics..?
young player development is worth 2 preseason games for sure
the rest of it can be debated...
the new coaches running new systems and evaluating their team
want the games - it's going to be a hard decision - there's just enough support for it to make it tricky
And most teams have lowered the ticket prices on preseason games

That's bunk and again you know it. Players development is far more than 2 exhibition games. They've had OTA's and training camps since the draft, so we're talking months. There's nothing sacrosanct about two additional exhibition games and there's no divide of non-player development teams and player development ones. Everyone's for player development, and successful teams are on both sides of the debate.Chizzang wrote:There's enough support for 4 games that it'll be hard to reduce the number of gamesGannonFan wrote:
There's a big difference between 2 and 4 preseason games, with you just a few posts ago advocating the latter (and now you seem to be swinging back to the lower number).
there's an argument for 2 but it gets shot down by teams with new staffs and new systems
That's the trick
if teams keep shuffling coaches like they do
the 4 game preseason will stick around
and the real player development teams are always for it
I concede it's a worthy debate

GannonFan wrote:That's bunk and again you know it. Players development is far more than 2 exhibition games. They've had OTA's and training camps since the draft, so we're talking months. There's nothing sacrosanct about two additional exhibition games and there's no divide of non-player development teams and player development ones. Everyone's for player development, and successful teams are on both sides of the debate.Chizzang wrote:
There's enough support for 4 games that it'll be hard to reduce the number of games
there's an argument for 2 but it gets shot down by teams with new staffs and new systems
That's the trick
if teams keep shuffling coaches like they do
the 4 game preseason will stick around
and the real player development teams are always for it
I concede it's a worthy debate