This response is not far different from your first one, Dawg, except that you characteristically misread part of mine. Your original response was a charateristic liberal response; i.e: lacking in substance and using insults where you have nothing else to offer.houndawg wrote:CID1990 wrote:
Now, that's a substantive response.
Krauthammer's sh!t is in a pile most of the time, and the fact that a liberal can only reply with a couple of weak insults pretty much proves it.
Yeah, Sidney, that surely proves it.I can see the headlines now - EXTRA! EXTRA! Krauthammer insulted by Houndawg, confims liberal plot for world domination!
You still have refuted nothing. This response was a little more snarky than the first one, but no different in substance.
Krauthammer is a garden-variety ideologue who sees communist plots behind every tree. Better one-liners and a little more personality than most of them.
Why not try refuting what Krauthammer has asserted? Quite frankly, I think even many liberals would agree with him on what Obama is up to right now. But then you simply remind one of something I heard about Rush Limbaugh once:
"He's nothing more than an old shopping cart with a squeaky wheel that pulls to the right [left] no matter which direction it is pointed in."