They could conceivably do scheduled doubleheaders (although I'm sure the players would push against that) but they won't ever be 1 gate doubleheaders - no one is going to give up the $$$ from an additional gate. If they did have DH's scheduled, they would be day/night ones.UNHWildCats wrote:thats where scheduled doubleheaders would come in.ODUalum11 wrote:
I think they'd have to shorten the season though in order to make it work because they'd be easily playing into November. For a sport that starts in late March, early April.
MLB Realignment
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: MLB Realignment
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: MLB Realignment
agreed it wont be single gate doubleheaders... though lower attendance teams may offer it if they feel they might make out better that way. As for players pushing against it, I agree they might be a bit against it, but the idea of finishing the season earlier could push them also allowing teams a extra roster spot or two to offset doubleheaders every week might push the players association to okay it as it would add 30 to 60 more jobs each season.GannonFan wrote:They could conceivably do scheduled doubleheaders (although I'm sure the players would push against that) but they won't ever be 1 gate doubleheaders - no one is going to give up the $$$ from an additional gate. If they did have DH's scheduled, they would be day/night ones.UNHWildCats wrote: thats where scheduled doubleheaders would come in.
- ODUalum11
- Level3

- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:08 pm
- I am a fan of: Monarchs, Gators, Huskies
Re: MLB Realignment
While its a good idea I think pitchers would strongly be against it, especially starters because that would then take a day of rest away from them. But then again you did propose for teams to have a couple extra roster spots...
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: MLB Realignment
No one pitches on short rest during the regular season even now - when there are rainout-induced DH's, it almost always involves a minor league callup or a long-reliever already on the roster, unless there were fortuitous days near the day of the DH, both before and after.ODUalum11 wrote:While its a good idea I think pitchers would strongly be against it, especially starters because that would then take a day of rest away from them. But then again you did propose for teams to have a couple extra roster spots...
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- CitadelGrad
- Level4

- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
- I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
- A.K.A.: El Cid
- Location: St. Louis
Re: MLB Realignment
No.bandl wrote:Uneven amount of teams in each leagueAshevilleApp wrote:
Why?
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

- DJH
- Level3

- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: The MVC
- Location: NORTHERN IOWA
Re: MLB Realignment
I think he meant an "odd" amount of teams in each league.CitadelGrad wrote:No.bandl wrote: Uneven amount of teams in each league
UNI FIGHT
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: MLB Realignment
Um, they used to do this but it got fucked up when they added wild-card teams and 3 divisions and prolonged those playoff rounds. Remember Reggie Jackson? Mr. October? It isn't just a name, it's because the WS was in October!UNHWildCats wrote:I have long held the opinion that MLB should have scheduled doubleheaders.... one every weekend split between Saturday and Sundays. Allow team to carry an extra player or 2 on the roster to offset the heavier workload... by doing this every week the season can end in early september and the playoffs done by mid october at the latest... enough of world series games going into november.AshevilleApp wrote:I've got no problem with a realignment to bring the Astros to the A.L., it would create a natural rivalry with the Rangers. I don't favor playoff expansion.
As for shortening the season as someone alluded to, I don't mind the 162 games in the regular season, but I would like to see the return of 5-10 doubleheaders each year. That way you're not playing the World Series in November and the fans get more bang for their increasingly expensive baseball buck.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: MLB Realignment
While comical, I don't understand his logic. It's about 200 miles LESS from Seattle to SD than it is from KC to Miami....DJH wrote:Here's Deadspin's solution.![]()
edit: in fact, the Marlins just need to be relocated...the support (or lack thereof) given to that squad by its fans is downright embarrassing. Move THEM to Oklahoma City, and add San Diego to that division and leave Seattle with the SF/Oakland and LA/Aneheim pairings.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: MLB Realignment
duh!CatMom wrote:Um, they used to do this but it got fucked up when they added wild-card teams and 3 divisions and prolonged those playoff rounds. Remember Reggie Jackson? Mr. October? It isn't just a name, it's because the WS was in October!UNHWildCats wrote: I have long held the opinion that MLB should have scheduled doubleheaders.... one every weekend split between Saturday and Sundays. Allow team to carry an extra player or 2 on the roster to offset the heavier workload... by doing this every week the season can end in early september and the playoffs done by mid october at the latest... enough of world series games going into november.
- ODUalum11
- Level3

- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:08 pm
- I am a fan of: Monarchs, Gators, Huskies
Re: MLB Realignment
I couldn't imagine the Yankees and Mets having to play 18-19 times a year. Except it would be huge in regards to saving travel costs.
- CatMom
- Level3

- Posts: 4289
- Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Texas St & Tight Ends
- A.K.A.: CatMILF
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: MLB Realignment
At least I'm old enough to remember this. (Course I also remember when it was 8 teams per league and it was winners take all, no playoffs). Yes, I'm that old.UNHWildCats wrote:duh!CatMom wrote: Um, they used to do this but it got fucked up when they added wild-card teams and 3 divisions and prolonged those playoff rounds. Remember Reggie Jackson? Mr. October? It isn't just a name, it's because the WS was in October!
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: MLB Realignment
I disagree. It's not uncommon to see races come down to the last day of the season. The fact that one team played the Yankees and Red Sox during interleague play while the other played the Mariners and Royals can make a difference.DJH wrote:Oh christ, they play 162 games. Every team doesn't have to play the exact same schedule to make it "fair". Playing that many games, things tend to even out, no matter who you are playing.UNHWildCats wrote:I definately favor equal leagues and divisions so moving Houston to the AL West makes sense, because currently its an advantage to play in the AL West and a disadvantage to play in the NL Central, moving them balances each division equally and also gives Texas and Houston a division rivalry.
I however oppose a no division alignment. To do this each team must play a balanced schedule since they are competing with every team for the playoff spots as opposed to only competing with every other team just for the wild card currently, yes right now some teams are at a disadvantage for the Wild card based on schedule, but atleast they are morte evenly scheduled when concerning the division champion playoff spot.
Under a one division format using interleague play, each team would likely play each other just 9 times and each team in the other league 3 times, doing this would require adding 9 games to each teams schedule, doing 8 games per league opponent instead of 9 would mean a 157 game schedule.
maintaining divisions would allow MLB to continue unbalanced schedules outside of each division.
Don't make this more difficult than it has to be.
While the schedules don't have to be exactly the same, MLB can do a better job. At least I think they can once Selig is gone.
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: MLB Realignment
The BlueHen86 plan:AZGrizFan wrote:While comical, I don't understand his logic. It's about 200 miles LESS from Seattle to SD than it is from KC to Miami....DJH wrote:Here's Deadspin's solution.![]()
edit: in fact, the Marlins just need to be relocated...the support (or lack thereof) given to that squad by its fans is downright embarrassing. Move THEM to Oklahoma City, and add San Diego to that division and leave Seattle with the SF/Oakland and LA/Aneheim pairings.
1. Drop two teams and revert to four 7 team divisions. (I'd be okay with adding 2 teams and going with four 8 team divisions, but I think 28 teams is better than 32).
2. Get rid of inter league play.
3. Have the second and third place teams play a best of three series Tues - Wed - Thurs and then have the winner play the first place team starting on Sat.
Last edited by BlueHen86 on Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ODUalum11
- Level3

- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:08 pm
- I am a fan of: Monarchs, Gators, Huskies
Re: MLB Realignment
I agree, interleague play can have a significant difference alone on a team's record. One team like the Yankees could possibly play all playoff contenders while a team like the red sox could play all lousy teams. Also does it really make sense to have a 6-team division such as the NL central? IMO, it makes the division very VERY hard to win.BlueHen86 wrote:I disagree. It's not uncommon to see races come down to the last day of the season. The fact that one team played the Yankees and Red Sox during interleague play while the other played the Mariners and Royals can make a difference.DJH wrote:
Oh christ, they play 162 games. Every team doesn't have to play the exact same schedule to make it "fair". Playing that many games, things tend to even out, no matter who you are playing.
Don't make this more difficult than it has to be.
While the schedules don't have to be exactly the same, MLB can do a better job. At least I think they can once Selig is gone.
- DJH
- Level3

- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: The MVC
- Location: NORTHERN IOWA
Re: MLB Realignment
Yes, races do come down to the last game sometimes. And that won't change, even if they do go through with some sort of realignment.BlueHen86 wrote:I disagree. It's not uncommon to see races come down to the last day of the season. The fact that one team played the Yankees and Red Sox during interleague play while the other played the Mariners and Royals can make a difference.DJH wrote:
Oh christ, they play 162 games. Every team doesn't have to play the exact same schedule to make it "fair". Playing that many games, things tend to even out, no matter who you are playing.
Don't make this more difficult than it has to be.
While the schedules don't have to be exactly the same, MLB can do a better job. At least I think they can once Selig is gone.
I really don't care if one team had to play the Yankees while another team may have had to play the Orioles or something. There is 159 other games for them to try and win if they cant beat the Yankees.
UNI FIGHT
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: MLB Realignment
The Mets play the Yankees 6 times this year and they also play the Rangers 3 times. I think the Mets played the Yankees 6 times last year too. They are at an unfair disadvantage. Being a Phillies fan I think it's funny, but I think they have a valid complaint.DJH wrote:Yes, races do come down to the last game sometimes. And that won't change, even if they do go through with some sort of realignment.BlueHen86 wrote:
I disagree. It's not uncommon to see races come down to the last day of the season. The fact that one team played the Yankees and Red Sox during interleague play while the other played the Mariners and Royals can make a difference.
While the schedules don't have to be exactly the same, MLB can do a better job. At least I think they can once Selig is gone.
I really don't care if one team had to play the Yankees while another team may have had to play the Orioles or something. There is 159 other games for them to try and win if they cant beat the Yankees.
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: MLB Realignment
While they are at it drop that stupid DH rule and make all the managers actually earn their money. 
- BlueHen86
- Supporter

- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: MLB Realignment
I'd be okay with that.SDHornet wrote:While they are at it drop that stupid DH rule and make all the managers actually earn their money.
- ODUalum11
- Level3

- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:08 pm
- I am a fan of: Monarchs, Gators, Huskies
Re: MLB Realignment
I wouldn't having the pitcher hit is a rally killer.BlueHen86 wrote:I'd be okay with that.SDHornet wrote:While they are at it drop that stupid DH rule and make all the managers actually earn their money.
- DJH
- Level3

- Posts: 3210
- Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: The MVC
- Location: NORTHERN IOWA
Re: MLB Realignment
Why can't pitchers be actual baseball players and learn to hit the ball?ODUalum11 wrote:I wouldn't having the pitcher hit is a rally killer.BlueHen86 wrote:
I'd be okay with that.
UNI FIGHT
- ODUalum11
- Level3

- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:08 pm
- I am a fan of: Monarchs, Gators, Huskies
Re: MLB Realignment
true, there are some who hit the ball pretty decent but a majority of them can't hit and then managers have heart attacks when they see their pitchers run the base paths. Being a Yankee fan, I'll never forget Ching Ming-Wang ran from third base to homeplate and injured himself during an interleague game in Houston and was out for the rest of the season and he was having a terrific year being the Yankees ace. He was never the same after that.DJH wrote:Why can't pitchers be actual baseball players and learn to hit the ball?ODUalum11 wrote:
I wouldn't having the pitcher hit is a rally killer.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: MLB Realignment
I'd be fine with this (dropping KC & Miami and having a draft), and I'd add: shorten the season back to 154 games.BlueHen86 wrote:The BlueHen86 plan:AZGrizFan wrote:
While comical, I don't understand his logic. It's about 200 miles LESS from Seattle to SD than it is from KC to Miami....
edit: in fact, the Marlins just need to be relocated...the support (or lack thereof) given to that squad by its fans is downright embarrassing. Move THEM to Oklahoma City, and add San Diego to that division and leave Seattle with the SF/Oakland and LA/Aneheim pairings.
1. Drop two teams and revert to four 7 team divisions. (I'd be okay with adding 2 teams and going with four 8 team divisions, but I think 28 teams is better than 32).
2. Get rid of inter league play.
3. Have the second and third place teams play a best of three series Tues - Wed - Thurs and then have the winner play the first place team starting on Sat.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

- ODUalum11
- Level3

- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 6:08 pm
- I am a fan of: Monarchs, Gators, Huskies
Re: MLB Realignment
Personally, I like interleague play. You get a bunch of teams who would never play each other.AZGrizFan wrote:I'd be fine with this (dropping KC & Miami and having a draft), and I'd add: shorten the season back to 154 games.BlueHen86 wrote:
The BlueHen86 plan:
1. Drop two teams and revert to four 7 team divisions. (I'd be okay with adding 2 teams and going with four 8 team divisions, but I think 28 teams is better than 32).
2. Get rid of inter league play.
3. Have the second and third place teams play a best of three series Tues - Wed - Thurs and then have the winner play the first place team starting on Sat.
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet

- Posts: 20856
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: MLB Realignment
As many around here know, I'm a bit (OK, MORE than a bit) old-fashioned about sports. Dump Interleague play. Dump the bloody DH. Dump this sit-and-wait-for-the-jack trash.
That said, I'm not thrilled with the idea of EITHER Houston to the AL OR Seattle losing ANOTHER team, particularly to the OKC. If baseball moves anywhere in the midwest (other than where they already are), going to Rosenblatt (or its successor) would be a better choice than OKC.
That said, I'm not thrilled with the idea of EITHER Houston to the AL OR Seattle losing ANOTHER team, particularly to the OKC. If baseball moves anywhere in the midwest (other than where they already are), going to Rosenblatt (or its successor) would be a better choice than OKC.

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.

