rkwittem wrote:Hypocrite? You had no issue with the Ian Williams play. I see no difference other than I don't like Sherman and you don't care about Williams. I just don't mind if the play is legal or not. Also, Sherman hasn't "dominated" my favorite team because he hasn't played against them. Still griping about my favorite team...move on, you don't need to know.
Oh wow. I didn't like that Ian Williams got hurt, I didn't wish for Ian Williams to get hurt, and he wasn't hurt on a dirty play. Which makes you a huge fucking classless douchebag. Comprende?
No one gives a shit about your "favorite" team. They obviously fucking suck more dick than you, otherwise you wouldn't be so ashamed to rep them publicly. Coward douche.
rkwittem wrote:Hypocrite? You had no issue with the Ian Williams play. I see no difference other than I don't like Sherman and you don't care about Williams. I just don't mind if the play is legal or not. Also, Sherman hasn't "dominated" my favorite team because he hasn't played against them. Still griping about my favorite team...move on, you don't need to know.
Oh wow. I didn't like that Ian Williams got hurt, I didn't wish for Ian Williams to get hurt, and he wasn't hurt on a dirty play. Which makes you a huge fucking classless douchebag. Comprende?
No one gives a shit about your "favorite" team. They obviously fucking suck more dick than you, otherwise you wouldn't be so ashamed to rep them publicly. Coward douche.
I didn't say Sherman had to get hurt on a dirty play...just cut block him legally the result is equally satisfying even if they did it illegally.
It's hard for me to believe that you don't give a shit about my favorite team (having a fine seasin, by the way) considering you keep bringing it uo repeatedly. I only refuse to tell you because A. It pisses you off, B. I don't have to, and C. I see no good reason to. Being called a coward by a fan blinded by his own love of his team has no meaning to me.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Oh wow. I didn't like that Ian Williams got hurt, I didn't wish for Ian Williams to get hurt, and he wasn't hurt on a dirty play. Which makes you a huge fucking classless douchebag. Comprende?
No one gives a shit about your "favorite" team. They obviously fucking suck more dick than you, otherwise you wouldn't be so ashamed to rep them publicly. Coward douche.
I didn't say Sherman had to get hurt on a dirty play...just cut block him legally the result is equally satisfying even if they did it illegally.
It's hard for me to believe that you don't give a shit about my favorite team (having a fine seasin, by the way) considering you keep bringing it uo repeatedly. I only refuse to tell you because A. It pisses you off, B. I don't have to, and C. I see no good reason to. Being called a coward by a fan blinded by his own love of his team has no meaning to me.
Clueless and full of it. You don't piss me off in the least; you're a pathetic, amusing clown.
And once again, no one cares about your "favorite" team, not even you. They're no one of significance, just like you.
And for people who didn't watch the game (rktwit), the hawks had plenty of chances to win. Granted there were some bad calls by the refs, but the Hawks should have still pushed through for the W. They completely dominated the Colts in the running game, but their D (go figure) let them down in the end. If this was played on a neutral field, I believe the Hawks would have won. Be it as it may, I'll take a 1-1 out of @Texans and @Colts. Now it's time to go home and brutalize the incoming Titans.
Niners get back to doing what they do best, and what do you know?
We're dominating teams again.
Kaepernick isn't Peyton Manning. So glad they're finally figuring that out.
That was an extremely impressive showing versus a good Texans team. Schaub must feel like shit after setting the new NFL record for pick 6s in 4 straight games.
Looking at the 49ers and Seahawks schedules, both teams could conceivably have 2-3 losses come that December 8th showdown, which if it already isn't epic enough could have the ultimate saying as to who wins the division and possibly the 1, 2, and 3 seed (considering how the Saints do).
And for people who didn't watch the game (rktwit), the hawks had plenty of chances to win. Granted there were some bad calls by the refs, but the Hawks should have still pushed through for the W. They completely dominated the Colts in the running game, but their D (go figure) let them down in the end. If this was played on a neutral field, I believe the Hawks would have won. Be it as it may, I'll take a 1-1 out of @Texans and @Colts. Now it's time to go home and brutalize the incoming Titans.
Yeah, I didn't watch the game, and no, I wasn't surprised by the result. Seattle travels worse because of their location. This game somewhat reminds me of how the 49ers lost at Minnesota last year. NFC west power running the table until they head to a midwest dome team with a transcendent talent. (Minny had AP, Harvin; Indy has Luck) That's basically what I'm getting at here. That's where the similarities end for me. Just some parallels to compare.
And for people who didn't watch the game (rktwit), the hawks had plenty of chances to win. Granted there were some bad calls by the refs, but the Hawks should have still pushed through for the W. They completely dominated the Colts in the running game, but their D (go figure) let them down in the end. If this was played on a neutral field, I believe the Hawks would have won. Be it as it may, I'll take a 1-1 out of @Texans and @Colts. Now it's time to go home and brutalize the incoming Titans.
Yeah, I didn't watch the game, and no, I wasn't surprised by the result. Seattle travels worse because of their location. This game somewhat reminds me of how the 49ers lost at Minnesota last year. NFC west power running the table until they head to a midwest dome team with a transcendent talent. (Minny had AP, Harvin; Indy has Luck) That's basically what I'm getting at here. That's where the similarities end for me. Just some parallels to compare.
And for people who didn't watch the game (rktwit), the hawks had plenty of chances to win. Granted there were some bad calls by the refs, but the Hawks should have still pushed through for the W. They completely dominated the Colts in the running game, but their D (go figure) let them down in the end. If this was played on a neutral field, I believe the Hawks would have won. Be it as it may, I'll take a 1-1 out of @Texans and @Colts. Now it's time to go home and brutalize the incoming Titans.
Lol at you and SE. Just admit you lost fair and square.
And for people who didn't watch the game (rktwit), the hawks had plenty of chances to win. Granted there were some bad calls by the refs, but the Hawks should have still pushed through for the W. They completely dominated the Colts in the running game, but their D (go figure) let them down in the end. If this was played on a neutral field, I believe the Hawks would have won. Be it as it may, I'll take a 1-1 out of @Texans and @Colts. Now it's time to go home and brutalize the incoming Titans.
Lol at you and SE. Just admit you lost fair and square.
Despite numerous laughable calls that went against Seattle, Hawks still had every chance in the world to win the game, and didn't capitalize. Considering we were without our starting all-pro center, pro-bowl LT, starting RT, starting TE, and battling ridiculous calls by the refs, I'd say the Hawks played pretty well.
Still, the officiating was horrendous. If you're gonna call defensive PI on Browner and Sherman for ticky tack contact, then you have to call defensive PI on the Colts DB who had his arm draped around Rice's waist. And the phantom PI on Doug Baldwin or the defensive TD that was ruled a safety? Please.
rkwittem wrote:
Yeah, I didn't watch the game, and no, I wasn't surprised by the result. Seattle travels worse because of their location. This game somewhat reminds me of how the 49ers lost at Minnesota last year. NFC west power running the table until they head to a midwest dome team with a transcendent talent. (Minny had AP, Harvin; Indy has Luck) That's basically what I'm getting at here. That's where the similarities end for me. Just some parallels to compare.
So transcendentalism is geographical? P
Not at all. But those two teams have/had transcendent talents. You could and probably will lose if you let those types of players do their thing at home.
It appears the Hawks destroyed Houston's soul a few weeks ago. Blown out by the 49ers, now the Rams are demolishing them... in Houston.
Fun fact: if the Colts lose to the Chargers today, every team Seattle has played will have lost the next week. Of the 4 so far, 3 of them have been blown out.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:It appears the Hawks destroyed Houston's soul a few weeks ago. Blown out by the 49ers, now the Rams are demolishing them... in Houston.
Fun fact: if the Colts lose to the Chargers today, every team Seattle has played will have lost the next week. Of the 4 so far, 3 of them have been blown out.
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:It appears the Hawks destroyed Houston's soul a few weeks ago. Blown out by the 49ers, now the Rams are demolishing them... in Houston.
Fun fact: if the Colts lose to the Chargers today, every team Seattle has played will have lost the next week. Of the 4 so far, 3 of them have been blown out.
Someone needs to punch this idiot in the fucking face. Fix your fucking hat you dick bag.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
lol that's an interesting theory. But I hope it's broken next week when the Titans play the 49ers. First things first, got to take care of business this Thursday against the Cards.
Clueless and full of it. You don't piss me off in the least; you're a pathetic, amusing clown. 
P
