Skjellyfetti wrote:CID1990 wrote:
Which alternative are you talking about?
The one that hasn't passed (and therefore can't be graded)
Well, there have been 4 or 5 iterations that have been graded. All of them are terrible.
And, if they pass something - it HAS to be scored by the CBO
before it's passed under reconciliation. So, I'm not sure where you get the notion that if it hasn't passed yet... it can't be graded.
CID1990 wrote:or the status quo ante ACA?
I assume this would be the straight repeal that Republicans have been pushing since 2010.
32 million more uninsured. 100% increase in premiums. No essential benefit requirement. Shittier, more expensive healthcare. I'm sure it would be wonderful for Wise, VA.

I shouldn't have said "graded"- especially with you
I meant can't be measured by people who are actually using it- i.e.: actually in practice
For example, ACA outcomes are either exactly as predicted or not at all - depending on what side of the issue you're on
But in terms of what is going on with the ACA right now, the anecdotal reports don't jibe all that well with the CBO
Status quo ante would mean the day before the ACA went into effect
I'm just trying to figure out what you mean by alternatives ... because right now we are under the ACA and nothing else-
A huge tax on the middle class (and an increase in their "insurance" premiums and deductibles to pay for 20 million people (out of nearly 400 million) to have health insurance
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk