I wasn't the one who interjected with some nonsensical drivel about "darkies" and water fountains.kalm wrote:
Latent racism? This is about states rights. It has nothing to do with racism whatsoever!
Nonsensical drivel? You mean history...If the only the South would have had a Paul Walker in the federal government to defend their freedom to associate!Baldy wrote:I wasn't the one who interjected with some nonsensical drivel about "darkies" and water fountains.kalm wrote:
Latent racism? This is about states rights. It has nothing to do with racism whatsoever!
Oh BTW, nice dodge regarding the regression of Blue States.
Would he have been too furious?kalm wrote:Nonsensical drivel? You mean history...If the only the South would have had a Paul Walker in the federal government to defend their freedom to associate!Baldy wrote:
I wasn't the one who interjected with some nonsensical drivel about "darkies" and water fountains.
Oh BTW, nice dodge regarding the regression of Blue States.
MaybeIbanez wrote:Would he have been too furious?kalm wrote:
Nonsensical drivel? You mean history...If the only the South would have had a Paul Walker in the federal government to defend their freedom to associate!
What part of history says it's OK to use racist epitaphs?kalm wrote:Nonsensical drivel? You mean history...If the only the South would have had a Paul Walker in the federal government to defend their freedom to associate!Baldy wrote:
I wasn't the one who interjected with some nonsensical drivel about "darkies" and water fountains.
Oh BTW, nice dodge regarding the regression of Blue States.
1). It wasn't my epitaph. I'm sorry it offended you.Baldy wrote:What part of history says it's OK to use racist epitaphs?kalm wrote:
Nonsensical drivel? You mean history...If the only the South would have had a Paul Walker in the federal government to defend their freedom to associate!
Paul Walker??????
That alone just emphasizes how out of touch you really are.
