Dershowitz - What Law did Trump Break - NONE

[Bisonfanatical]

Oh, I am sure we have "more" than enough political hacks writing articles with the sole purpose of swaying the opinions of others, instead of throwing out facts and letting others make up their own mind.
That actually is what they are paid to do, sway opinions.
He has zero tolerance of those whose opinions he can't sway, no difference from the other political hacks out there.

I have no time for hannity or O'Reilly so that is a moot point. If you show me articles supporting independent thinking as exhibited by either rand paul or ron paul then I will change my view about him ... I don't believe articles like that exist from any political hacks much less him.

Neither party needs more political parrots that find more ways to spread the same political nonsense.

This country needs MORE "independent" thought that points out the destructive policies which are being implimented by BOTH parties.

Blind party loyalty ... Good Grief!

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

A blind party loyalty criticism coming from a Jew for Jesus....

You sometimes post some good thoughts ... try to focus now .... your drifting

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

A blind party loyalty criticism coming from a Jew for Jesus....

You sometimes post some good thoughts ... try to focus now .... your drifting

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Whatever helps you lay your head down at the end of the evening and slip into an altered state of consciousness marked by muscle relaxation and a reduced perception of ones surroundings.



Or sleep...whatever floats your watercraft of various size made from various materials.













Or boat.

[Chizzang]

You are completely ignorant of George Will
and yet you type words about him anyway... (that's odd)

Regardless of your agreement or disagreement with Mr. Will

on a political basis
George never constructed a flimsy argument
was able to back up virtually everything he said
He always understood both sides of the debate at hand
He has zero tolerance for buffoons and poorly constructed notions

He criticizes O'reilly and Hannity on very specific arguments
and for their blind support and stupidity
Not for being conservative

George Will is precisely what BOTH PARTIES need MORE of not less

Oh, I am sure we have "more" than enough political hacks writing articles with the sole purpose of swaying the opinions of others, instead of throwing out facts and letting others make up their own mind.
That actually is what they are paid to do, sway opinions.
He has zero tolerance of those whose opinions he can't sway, no difference from the other political hacks out there.

I have no time for hannity or O'Reilly so that is a moot point. If you show me articles supporting independent thinking as exhibited by either rand paul or ron paul then I will change my view about him ... I don't believe articles like that exist from any political hacks much less him.

Neither party needs more political parrots that find more ways to spread the same political nonsense.

This country needs MORE "independent" thought that points out the destructive policies which are being implimented by BOTH parties.

Blind party loyalty ... Good Grief!

I'm looking for you to clarify the "He was never a Republican" comment...
And:
George Will made his money writing books far more than he did writing political opinions

Also
You appear to be claiming that you possess Independent thought
I'll be looking for any evidence of that in your posts - haven't seen any yet

[Bisonfanatical]

I like how my response to you dissapeared?
How do you suppose that happens?

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Bisonfanatical]

I said
he was never a Republican
really meant to say
He was not actually a Republican at the end.

"In a 2013 interview with Reason Magazine writers Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch, Will said his views have gradually but steadily become more libertarian.[36]"

Straight from the horses mouth?



Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Bisonfanatical]

You disagree with me because my thoughts are not dependent on your thoughts
Therefore, Thoughts that are independent of yours are

Wait for it

Independent thoughts!

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

You disagree with me because my thoughts are not dependent on your thoughts
Therefore, Thoughts that are independent of yours are

Wait for it

Independent thoughts!

I disagree with you because you have no idea what you're talking about
Irrespective of any "thought"



also: I see
You're quite the semantics expert

[Bisonfanatical]

Well now,

I guess you told me.







Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

The Republican Party of Buckley's days was much more libertarian than it is in practice today (although they talk a big game)

If anything, the GOP evolved away from Will

I know my views on government have moved a little bit more libertarian over the years, but in the balance the GOP has migrated much more than I have.

[JohnStOnge]

Here's the thing:

People who were thinking Republicans two years ago are no longer Republicans now. Will is an example.

My wife is another.

[Chizzang]

Here's the thing:

People who were thinking Republicans two years ago are no longer Republicans now. Will is an example.

My wife is another.

I've got a little secret for you John...
I can't call myself a Democrat anymore, however I am a Liberal in that I think big religion is a plague
and I think women's healthcare should basically be unlimited coverage of any kind
and I think coal is a sh!tty form of energy
and I think taxes aren't REALLY the problem

[kalm]

The Republican Party of Buckley's days was much more libertarian than it is in practice today (although they talk a big game)

If anything, the GOP evolved away from Will

I know my views on government have moved a little bit more libertarian over the years, but in the balance the GOP has migrated much more than I have.

Spot fucking on.

CID be ripping some tits in this thread.

[kalm]

Here's the thing:

People who were thinking Republicans two years ago are no longer Republicans now. Will is an example.

My wife is another.

I've got a little secret for you John...
I can't call myself a Democrat anymore, however I am a Liberal in that I think big religion is a plague
and I think women's healthcare should basically be unlimited coverage of any kind
and I think coal is a sh!tty form of energy
and I think taxes aren't REALLY the problem

What do you mean by "taxes aren't REALLY the problem"?

I may owe you an apology for misunderstanding this position of yours in the past...

[Ivytalk]

I've got a little secret for you John...
I can't call myself a Democrat anymore, however I am a Liberal in that I think big religion is a plague
and I think women's healthcare should basically be unlimited coverage of any kind
and I think coal is a sh!tty form of energy
and I think taxes aren't REALLY the problem

What do you mean by "taxes aren't REALLY the problem"?

I may owe you an apology for misunderstanding this position of yours in the past...

Chizzang says SPENDING is REALLY the problem, although one begets the other.

[kalm]

What do you mean by "taxes aren't REALLY the problem"?

I may owe you an apology for misunderstanding this position of yours in the past...

Chizzang says SPENDING is REALLY the problem, although one begets the other.

That's what I assumed but how does that make him a liberal as he alludes to in the post I quoted?

[Ivytalk]

Chizzang says SPENDING is REALLY the problem, although one begets the other.

That's what I assumed but how does that make him a liberal as he alludes to in the post I quoted?

No. Good point. It actually detracts from his libtard street cred. Never met a libtard who wanted to rein in federal spending.

[kalm]

That's what I assumed but how does that make him a liberal as he alludes to in the post I quoted?

No. Good point. It actually detracts from his libtard street cred. Never met a libtard who wanted to rein in federal spending.

I do.

[Col Hogan]

That's what I assumed but how does that make him a liberal as he alludes to in the post I quoted?

No. Good point. It actually detracts from his libtard street cred. Never met a libtard who wanted to rein in federal spending.

I've never met a neo-con republican who wants to rein in federal spending, either.

Neo-cons and neo-libs both love huge federal government...they simply disagree on which segments need more bloating

[CID1990]

No. Good point. It actually detracts from his libtard street cred. Never met a libtard who wanted to rein in federal spending.

I do.

Then on that issue you aren't liberal.

Liberal means not have a problem with liberally setting liberal amounts of money on fire


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Chizzang]

I do.

Then on that issue you aren't liberal.

Liberal means not have a problem with liberally setting liberal amounts of money on fire

Settle down there Mr.



Liberal means no such thing

[Grizalltheway]

No. Good point. It actually detracts from his libtard street cred. Never met a libtard who wanted to rein in federal spending.

I've never met a neo-con republican who wants to rein in federal spending, either.

Neo-cons and neo-libs both love huge federal government...they simply disagree on which segments need more bloating

I'm sure you'd be okay with federal retirement being gutted, with no one being grandfathered in...

[CAA Flagship]

Liberal means no such thing

Right On!!!!

[Col Hogan]

I've never met a neo-con republican who wants to rein in federal spending, either.

Neo-cons and neo-libs both love huge federal government...they simply disagree on which segments need more bloating

I'm sure you'd be okay with federal retirement being gutted, with no one being grandfathered in...

Give me back all the contributions I made...keep the employer contributions...and I'm ok. See, I saved and invested wisely, so I'm responsible for myself. Just give me what I earned...nothing more.

[93henfan]

I'm sure you'd be okay with federal retirement being gutted, with no one being grandfathered in...

Give me back all the contributions I made...keep the employer contributions...and I'm ok. See, I saved and invested wisely, so I'm responsible for myself. Just give me what I earned...nothing more.

Agreed. Same with Social Security and Medicare. Want to take it away? Fine. Give me back my contributions plus reasonable interest. No problem.

[CAA Flagship]

Give me back all the contributions I made...keep the employer contributions...and I'm ok. See, I saved and invested wisely, so I'm responsible for myself. Just give me what I earned...nothing more.

Agreed. Same with Social Security and Medicare. Want to take it away? Fine. Give me back my contributions plus reasonable interest. No problem.

Party Poopers.