I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?
Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.
The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.
It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems.dbackjon wrote:I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?
Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.
The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.
It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money)ASUMountaineer wrote:UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems.dbackjon wrote:I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?
Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.
The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.
It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
-
dal4018
- Level5

- Posts: 10679
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 12:17 pm
- I am a fan of: South Carolina St
- A.K.A.: SC State
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
Call Peyton for a loan lol!!!
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38528
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
No they are not alone. Our add a few zeros to the UT numbers and you have our Federal Government.dbackjon wrote:They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money)ASUMountaineer wrote:
UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems.![]()
They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter

- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
The Federal Government should drop down to FCS. Lower budget more regional rivalries, and BUS TRIPS!CAA Flagship wrote:No they are not alone. Our add a few zeros to the UT numbers and you have our Federal Government.dbackjon wrote:
They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money)![]()
They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
DSUrocks07 wrote:The Federal Government should drop down to FCS. Lower budget more regional rivalries, and BUS TRIPS!CAA Flagship wrote: No they are not alone. Our add a few zeros to the UT numbers and you have our Federal Government.
Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2
- SDHornet
- Supporter

- Posts: 19511
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
Amazing that even SEC teams are struggling to keep up in the arms races. They are eating their own now. Since this is a publicly funded university, I wonder how well this mismanagement is being taken by the taxpayers.dbackjon wrote:I thought all Big Time FBS programs made money hand over fist?
Now, after staggering to losing football seasons in four of the last five years and seeing attendance drop to levels last seen in the 1970s, the Vols find themselves mired in more than $200 million of debt, the most in the SEC, with reserves of just $1.95 million, the least in the conference.
The athletic department spends a startling $21 million a year on debt payments, $13.5 million of which comes from the school’s stressed $99.5 million athletic budget and the rest from donations.
It’s an ugly financial picture for one of the nation’s strongest football brands, the kind of financial hole that SEC football giants aren’t supposed to be in, brought about by expensive coaching buyouts and costly improvements to Neyland Stadium and other athletic facilities, just as the losing seasons set in.
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jour ... essee.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- ASUMountaineer
- Level4

- Posts: 5047
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:38 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Old North State
Re: UT-Knoxville - Athletics 220 Million in debt
dbackjon wrote:They may take in a lot of money, but not turning a profit (which would be making money)ASUMountaineer wrote:
UTK does make money "hand-over-fist." The problem is, they spent more money than they were bringing in. I know it may be hard to comprehend, but typically when you spend more money than you have, you end up in debt. Fiscal mismanagement always leads to problems.![]()
They projected they would be able to make enough money to pay for everything. They didn't. They are not alone in this regard.
I am surprised that you take issue with UTK's athletic department for the way they have mismanaged their finances...
Appalachian State Mountaineers:
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!
National Champions: 2005, 2006, and 2007
Southern Conference Champions: 1986, 1987, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2012
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! WE'RE GONNA SHOUT IT! NOTHING'S HOTTER THAN A-S-U!