
And there's still a full quarter left…
Mvemjsunpx wrote:And another interception. WTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTF?![]()
And there's still a full quarter left…
Grizalltheway wrote:Mvemjsunpx wrote:And another interception. WTFWTFWTFWTFWTFWTF?![]()
And there's still a full quarter left…
Gunning for SFA's mark?
NYDuke wrote:What must the Dukes do to get a little respect from the national pundits? I can understand the home town fans . . . as it should be, but over the past week I read and heard terms like "slow," "weak defensively" (how many ints today?) and "weak bench" (whatever the heck that means - a true soph TE lit it up the past two weeks). With today's route of the Jackrabbits many of those prognosticators should take a closer look at JMU and perhaps quit dismissing them as an anomaly. I harken back to last year's championship game. Unfortunately had to watch it on TV and all I heard was Youngstown, Youngstown, Youngstown . . . all while the Dukes dismantled the so-called "fabled" (the announcer's term not mine) Youngstown program. Even NDSU fans should be offended! Perhaps with a victory at Frisco (not a sure thing by any means - we Dukes fans respect the Bison) perhaps the Dukes may finally get a little "love." What say you?
Was it better?Mvemjsunpx wrote:JohnStOnge wrote:I think this semi is going to be a lot better game than the first semi was.
It would be hard for it not to be.
SeattleGriz wrote:Was it better?Mvemjsunpx wrote:
It would be hard for it not to be.
JohnStOnge wrote:I had to leave a little after halftime. I knew South Dakota State had 5 turnovers in the first half. I see they had 10 turnovers for the game.[u] I'm trying to remember if I've ever seen anybody have 10 turnovers before. [/u]
I felt like early on South Dakota State was actually outplaying JMU. Moving the ball better, etc. But they kept turning the ball over. Later on it looked like JMU was taking control in terms of being able to move the ball. But I felt like South Dakota State missed an opportunity to get off to a good start and a lead because of the turnovers.
SeattleGriz wrote:Was it better?Mvemjsunpx wrote:
It would be hard for it not to be.
SeattleGriz wrote:Was it better?Mvemjsunpx wrote:
It would be hard for it not to be.
Return to “Championship Subdivision Football - FCS”
Users browsing this forum: bearkat91, Mvemjsunpx and 95 guests