Infringe upon WCU's trademark status.....BlueHen86 wrote:If they are not allowed to use the Liberty logo, I suggest that they use Tinky-Winky as their new logo.


Infringe upon WCU's trademark status.....BlueHen86 wrote:If they are not allowed to use the Liberty logo, I suggest that they use Tinky-Winky as their new logo.


Good points.....swayed my opinion on this issue....consistency...CID1990 wrote:?? Not sure I follow you on being contradictory. I did not claim to know of any liberal schools banning the GOP clubs.TwinTownBisonFan wrote:
liberty is basically an arm of the GOP - and if they want be receiving federal student aid money they need either allow political expression or they don't. but their tax exempt status needs to go away if they are going to work as an arm of a political party.
your own statement is contradictory - i've never found a "liberal" campus to have banned the GOP. THAT is tolerance... not supporting a schools decision to make itself an arm of a political party.
Colleges are tax exempt, and this status has nothing to do with whether the schools advocate political positions, theology or discriminate. This is not to be confused with churches being political (like every AME I have ever been to). The central argument in the VMI-The Citadel gender cases was that those schools were public and accepted public funds. The argument that private schools also accept public funds did not hold water with the courts. In fact, the central decision behind the VMI/Cit cases revolved around their status as state-supported institutions. What those cases inadvertently did was give tacit approval to private schools doing whatever the hell they want to. All female schools still discriminate based on gender, yet they were deemed untouchable by Judge C. Weston Houck and the Federal Court in Charleston. I believe the 4th District also supported this.
No way Liberty gets penalized for this, and they shouldn't be. Again, if a public school did this, then you'd have a beef.

TwinTownBisonFan wrote:liberty is basically an arm of the GOP - and if they want be receiving federal student aid money they need either allow political expression or they don't. but their tax exempt status needs to go away if they are going to work as an arm of a political party.CID1990 wrote:I don't understand the outrage (not to mention what seems like surprise). Liberty is a private school. If this happened at App State or Delaware, then it would be an issue.
I don't agree with booting the club, but then I don't send my money to Liberty, either. Like it or not, fundamentalists are as entitled to their belief system as much as anyone else, and quite frankly as much as I disagree with their beliefs I am not threatened by them and neither are any of you.
I thought we were supposed to celebrate diversity.
your own statement is contradictory - i've never found a "liberal" campus to have banned the GOP. THAT is tolerance... not supporting a schools decision to make itself an arm of a political party.


The point is that those same colleges don't kick College Republican b/c of the RNC's platform. Difference of opinion is welcomed unlike Liberty. Exclusivity is something that is not tolerated in my world. Except for KKK, skinheads, Nazi, you know race superiority complexes.AZGrizFan wrote:TwinTownBisonFan wrote:
liberty is basically an arm of the GOP - and if they want be receiving federal student aid money they need either allow political expression or they don't. but their tax exempt status needs to go away if they are going to work as an arm of a political party.
your own statement is contradictory - i've never found a "liberal" campus to have banned the GOP. THAT is tolerance... not supporting a schools decision to make itself an arm of a political party.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
And 95% of the colleges in America are an "arm" of the Democratic party. What's your point?









I've made no statements that aren't verifiable by fact.Cap'n Cat wrote:Good clarification, SuperJon.
Liberty, as many have mentioned, is a private school and I'm not comfortable even with whether the fact that they receive federal funding for things is enough to "crucify" them (pardon the pun) over this. As such, I will err on the side of them having the right to dispense with that club.
As well, reactionaries and gross generalizers like AZGF have no credibility on this debate as they show their over-the-top ass with comments such as his.
Shame, Z.


AZGrizFan wrote:I've made no statements that aren't verifiable by fact.Cap'n Cat wrote:Good clarification, SuperJon.
Liberty, as many have mentioned, is a private school and I'm not comfortable even with whether the fact that they receive federal funding for things is enough to "crucify" them (pardon the pun) over this. As such, I will err on the side of them having the right to dispense with that club.
As well, reactionaries and gross generalizers like AZGF have no credibility on this debate as they show their over-the-top ass with comments such as his.
Shame, Z.

Another AZ Victory noted.Cap'n Cat wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
I've made no statements that aren't verifiable by fact.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()


2XAZGrizFan wrote:Another AZ Victory noted.Cap'n Cat wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Too late, I already graduatedpolsongrizz wrote:They also then need to kick the conks out as they support gay marriage, i.e. Log Cabin Republicans...


MarkCCU wrote:Isn't it un-Christian like to judge? WAFJ. These wankers need to not alienate thier students this way. It can do as it pleases, but would you really want to quell the voice of some students?
