SeattleGriz wrote:CID1990 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 22, 2022 6:25 am
OSINT sources for what? Saying that your sources are lying?
I can post sources all day that talk about troop movements and engagements in and around contested areas like Mariupol and none of them mention anything about the Azov Battalion using civilians as shields or refusing them passage to leave the city. If it was happening it would be obvious and it would be reported.
Nice try with the “prove my fabricated sources from Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine are wrong”
In other words, prove a negative
It is up to YOU to substantiate these sources.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No, posting OSINT sources to get a better understanding of what is happening AND to see the level of validation you are applying.
You rarely post anything to back up your claims.
It’s really simple, SG.
If you research reputable OSINT sites, you’ll find a plethora of sites that are peer validated and reputable.
So, when you go over to “The Googles”, try searching “best osint in ukraine”
Instead of “Azov Battalion neo Nazis atrocities in Ukraine”
Because on that last one ^^^^ you will certainly find all kinds of reports to validate those preconceived notions. Just as if you Google “proof the earth is flat”
I’ll help you out here. You can start with Bellingcat. They have lots of eyes on the ground. They debunk a lot of doctored stuff coming out of Ukraine. They have some slant but if the AB was doing bad things in the east you had better believe they would be on it. You can even reach out to some of their reporters to see if they have any interest in a focus on the Azov Battalion.
liveuamap does geolocation
Oryx will not help you to debunk the Russian misinformation but it is neat because it tallies all the hardware they are losing, using video or photographic validation
These ^^^ are all reputable OSINT sites until they are not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk