Don't be lazy- look it up. You even inadvertently named it in your replyJohnStOnge wrote:I think the approach I took meets the definition of ad hominem argument. But feel free to make your case for it better fitting the definition of another logical fallacy. If you're correct I will have learned something.CID1990 wrote:
Incorrect.
Your logical fallacy (which you have freely admitted to) fits squarely into another category (which is related to the Ad Hominem attack but not the same)
Go look it up and report back to me.
Report back when you have somethinh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk









