Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Political discussions
User avatar
Rob Iola
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3724
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Lurking

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by Rob Iola »

Ibanez wrote:
D1B wrote:
Everyone gets your point, except for the religious nutjobs here. They don't understand anything outside of total fascist theocracy.
Stop using big words, you'll just end up dumbing it down for them.


btw, when did we behead people?
Or burn witches?
Proletarians of the world, unite!
User avatar
Appaholic
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8583
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
Location: Mills River, NC

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by Appaholic »

This is Islam circa 2011

Image
http://www.takeahikewnc.com

“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck

Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

Rob Iola wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
Stop using big words, you'll just end up dumbing it down for them.


btw, when did we behead people?
Or burn witches?
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

Appaholic wrote:This is Islam circa 2011

Image
In this respect radical Islam has not changed in its entire existence.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

Chizzang wrote:
... Any attentive high school student knows most of the Founders were Deists and Unitarians

:coffee:
Of the 39 signers of the Constitution, all but a handful professed a Christian religion. Here is the box score:

20 Episcopalians including 2 who also had Quaker leanings and 1 who had deist leanings
7 Presbyterians, including 1 who also had deist leanings
5 Congregationalists
2 Roman Catholics
2 Methodists
2 Lutherans, including 1 with Quaker leanings
1 and ONLY 1 pure Desist, our beloved Benjamin Franklin, one of my favorites

:coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: 8-) :lol:
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

Chizzang wrote:
... Thomas Jefferson dismissed the Trinity as "incomprehensible jargon."

He and other Founders made no mention of God in the Constitution ...
Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.

The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

Chizzang wrote: ... as various scholars have noted, disestablishment grew out of respect, not disdain, for religion, which James Madison observed "flourishes in greater purity without rather than with the aid of government."

Something the Tea Party will never understand...
Correction: ...something only the Tea Party seems to understand... :thumb:
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
D1B
Chris's Bitch
Chris's Bitch
Posts: 18397
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 5:34 am
I am a fan of: Morehead State

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by D1B »

native wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
... Any attentive high school student knows most of the Founders were Deists and Unitarians

:coffee:
Of the 39 signers of the Constitution, all but a handful professed a Christian religion. Here is the box score:

20 Episcopalians including 2 who also had Quaker leanings and 1 who had deist leanings
7 Presbyterians, including 1 who also had deist leanings
5 Congregationalists
2 Roman Catholics
2 Methodists
2 Lutherans, including 1 with Quaker leanings
1 and ONLY 1 pure Desist, our beloved Benjamin Franklin, one of my favorites

:coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: :coffee: 8-) :lol:

Nice use of the qualifier "pure" :lol: Most of em despised religion, regardless of their label.
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."

AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
youngterrier
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2709
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
I am a fan of: the option
A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
Location: a computer (duh)

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by youngterrier »

native wrote:
Chizzang wrote:
... Thomas Jefferson dismissed the Trinity as "incomprehensible jargon."

He and other Founders made no mention of God in the Constitution ...
Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.

The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Paine
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

youngterrier wrote:
native wrote:
Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.

The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Paine
I take your points, YT, but the thoughtful, respectful and sometimes even religious Deists in the days of the Founders had a great deal more in common with the Tea Partiers of today than the "progressives" of today, who constantly show their disdain and lack of respect for all things Christian and religious.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by houndawg »

youngterrier wrote:
native wrote:
Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.

The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Paine

You are correct that the highlighted terms are not exclusive to chrsitians.

Regardless of their religion they agreed that "the United States are in no sense a chrsitian nation" strongly enough to make it the Law of the Land in 1790.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by houndawg »

native wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: Or burn witches?
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
As good a definition of religion as any. :nod:
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

houndawg wrote:
native wrote:
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
As good a definition of religion as any. :nod:
There are certainly those who use religion as an excuse. No doubt about it.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by houndawg »

native wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: Or burn witches?
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
The Salem witches? You believe in witches, nate?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

houndawg wrote:
youngterrier wrote: If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Paine

You are correct that the highlighted terms are not exclusive to chrsitians.

Regardless of their religion they agreed that "the United States are in no sense a chrsitian nation" strongly enough to make it the Law of the Land in 1790.
The Treaty of Tripoli was signed in 1797, not 1790, and is a treaty, not the same as the "law of the land." It validates the rule of law in the United States, which gives freedom OF religion, not freedom from religion.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

houndawg wrote:
native wrote:
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
The Salem witches? You believe in witches, nate?
Only you and Olbermann, dawg. :lol:
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by houndawg »

native wrote:
houndawg wrote:

You are correct that the highlighted terms are not exclusive to chrsitians.

Regardless of their religion they agreed that "the United States are in no sense a chrsitian nation" strongly enough to make it the Law of the Land in 1790.
The Treaty of Tripoli was signed in 1797, not 1790, and is a treaty, not the same as the "law of the land." It validates the rule of law in the United States, which gives freedom OF religion, not freedom from religion.
1) My bad, 1797 is the correct date.

2) All treaties are law, nate: "This Constitution, and the laws which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Article VI, section 2

3) Freedom of religion is freedom from religion.


The treaty was accepted by the Senate unanimously and signed by John Adams. There is no wiggle room, nate, this is a very clear picture of how the founding fathers viewed the subject, much to the dismay of the usual collection of crooks and control freaks that have spent the past two hundred years trying to force-feed the nation their whack job cosmology.
Last edited by houndawg on Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

houndawg wrote:
native wrote:
The Treaty of Tripoli was signed in 1797, not 1790, and is a treaty, not the same as the "law of the land." It validates the rule of law in the United States, which gives freedom OF religion, not freedom from religion.
1) My bad, 1797 is the correct date.

2) All treaties are law, nate: "This Constitution, and the laws which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Article VI, section 2

3) Freedom of religion is freedom from religion.
...which you enjoy in great measure.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by houndawg »

native wrote:
houndawg wrote:
1) My bad, 1797 is the correct date.

2) All treaties are law, nate: "This Constitution, and the laws which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Article VI, section 2

3) Freedom of religion is freedom from religion.
...which you enjoy in great measure.

And wish to continue doing without input from the followers of our vast array of religions..
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
native
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5635
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
I am a fan of: Weber State
Location: On the road from Cibola

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by native »

houndawg wrote:
native wrote:
...which you enjoy in great measure.

And wish to continue doing.
You are in absolutely no danger of losing your freedoms even if every conceivable conservative and Tea Party candidate wins in the next election.
Proud Prince of Purple Pomposity
Image
Image
Image
YT is not a communist. He's just a ...young pup.
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25096
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by houndawg »

native wrote:
houndawg wrote:

And wish to continue doing.
You are in absolutely no danger of losing your freedoms even if every conceivable conservative and Tea Party candidate wins in the next election.
non sequitur much? :?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by Gil Dobie »

native wrote:
Rob Iola wrote: Or burn witches?
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
300 years ago the people here were British Colonist. But in the 1800's the US Army and Native American's mutilated the bodies of their defeated enemies which included beheading on occasion, and was not exclusive to combatants. The Native American's generally followed their spiritual beliefs as to where and what to cut on the human body, US soldiers for other reasons such as revenge, racism, etc. Books like "Son of the Morning Star" (Custer) go into detail about the mutilations. As far as burning people at the stake, just take a look at the KKK and African American history.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 69154
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by kalm »

native wrote:
youngterrier wrote: If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Paine
I take your points, YT, but the thoughtful, respectful and sometimes even religious Deists in the days of the Founders had a great deal more in common with the Tea Partiers of today than the "progressives" of today, who constantly show their disdain and lack of respect for all things Christian and religious.
A vast majority of progressives are religious and a majority of progressives follow the teachings of the original progressive and probably more closely than the average tea bagger. :thumb:

I now know why you hate the enlightenment. :rofl:
Image
Image
Image
Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 9921
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by Baldy »

kalm wrote:
native wrote:
I take your points, YT, but the thoughtful, respectful and sometimes even religious Deists in the days of the Founders had a great deal more in common with the Tea Partiers of today than the "progressives" of today, who constantly show their disdain and lack of respect for all things Christian and religious.
A vast majority of progressives are religious and a majority of progressives follow the teachings of the original progressive and probably more closely than the average tea bagger. :thumb:

I now know why you hate the enlightenment. :rofl:
...and I though Paine was a cerebral ancestor of socialists and anarchists. :ugeek:

:lol:
blueballs
Level3
Level3
Posts: 2590
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:00 am
I am a fan of: Cap'n's porn collection
A.K.A.: blueballs
Location: Central FL, where bums have to stay in their designated area on the sidewalk

Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem

Post by blueballs »

houndawg wrote:
native wrote:
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
The Salem witches? You believe in witches, nate?
Yepper, we had one as Speaker of the House for the past four years.
Blueballs: The ultimate 'bad case of the wants.'
Post Reply