Or burn witches?Ibanez wrote:Stop using big words, you'll just end up dumbing it down for them.D1B wrote:
Everyone gets your point, except for the religious nutjobs here. They don't understand anything outside of total fascist theocracy.
btw, when did we behead people?
Islam and the Intolerance Problem
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
Proletarians of the world, unite!
- Appaholic
- Supporter

- Posts: 8583
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:35 am
- I am a fan of: Montana, WCU & FCS
- A.K.A.: Rehab-aholic
- Location: Mills River, NC
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
This is Islam circa 2011


http://www.takeahikewnc.com
“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck
Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
“It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.” - The Buffalo Beast commenting on Glenn Beck
Consume. Watch TV. Be Silent. Work. Die.
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.Rob Iola wrote:Or burn witches?Ibanez wrote:
Stop using big words, you'll just end up dumbing it down for them.
btw, when did we behead people?
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
In this respect radical Islam has not changed in its entire existence.Appaholic wrote:This is Islam circa 2011
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
Of the 39 signers of the Constitution, all but a handful professed a Christian religion. Here is the box score:Chizzang wrote:
... Any attentive high school student knows most of the Founders were Deists and Unitarians
20 Episcopalians including 2 who also had Quaker leanings and 1 who had deist leanings
7 Presbyterians, including 1 who also had deist leanings
5 Congregationalists
2 Roman Catholics
2 Methodists
2 Lutherans, including 1 with Quaker leanings
1 and ONLY 1 pure Desist, our beloved Benjamin Franklin, one of my favorites
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.Chizzang wrote:
... Thomas Jefferson dismissed the Trinity as "incomprehensible jargon."
He and other Founders made no mention of God in the Constitution ...
The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
Correction: ...something only the Tea Party seems to understand...Chizzang wrote: ... as various scholars have noted, disestablishment grew out of respect, not disdain, for religion, which James Madison observed "flourishes in greater purity without rather than with the aid of government."
Something the Tea Party will never understand...
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
native wrote:Of the 39 signers of the Constitution, all but a handful professed a Christian religion. Here is the box score:Chizzang wrote:
... Any attentive high school student knows most of the Founders were Deists and Unitarians
20 Episcopalians including 2 who also had Quaker leanings and 1 who had deist leanings
7 Presbyterians, including 1 who also had deist leanings
5 Congregationalists
2 Roman Catholics
2 Methodists
2 Lutherans, including 1 with Quaker leanings
1 and ONLY 1 pure Desist, our beloved Benjamin Franklin, one of my favorites
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nice use of the qualifier "pure"
"Sarah Palin absolutely blew AWAY the audience tonight. If there was any doubt as to whether she was savvy enough, tough enough or smart enough to carry the mantle of Vice President, she put those fears to rest tonight. She took on Barack Obama DIRECTLY on every issue and exposed... She did it with warmth and humor, and came across as the every-person....it's becoming mroe and more clear that she was a genius pick for McCain."
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
AZGrizfan - Summer 2008
-
youngterrier
- Level3

- Posts: 2709
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:23 pm
- I am a fan of: the option
- A.K.A.: Boss the Terrier
- Location: a computer (duh)
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Painenative wrote:Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.Chizzang wrote:
... Thomas Jefferson dismissed the Trinity as "incomprehensible jargon."
He and other Founders made no mention of God in the Constitution ...
The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
I take your points, YT, but the thoughtful, respectful and sometimes even religious Deists in the days of the Founders had a great deal more in common with the Tea Partiers of today than the "progressives" of today, who constantly show their disdain and lack of respect for all things Christian and religious.youngterrier wrote:If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Painenative wrote:
Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.
The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
youngterrier wrote:If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Painenative wrote:
Thomas Jefferson was serving as an Ambassador in France and did not sign the Constitution.
The founding document of which Thomas Jefferson WAS the principal author reads, in part, "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the consent of the governed ... And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives...
You are correct that the highlighted terms are not exclusive to chrsitians.
Regardless of their religion they agreed that "the United States are in no sense a chrsitian nation" strongly enough to make it the Law of the Land in 1790.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
As good a definition of religion as any.native wrote:It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.Rob Iola wrote: Or burn witches?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
There are certainly those who use religion as an excuse. No doubt about it.houndawg wrote:As good a definition of religion as any.native wrote:
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
The Salem witches? You believe in witches, nate?native wrote:It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.Rob Iola wrote: Or burn witches?
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
The Treaty of Tripoli was signed in 1797, not 1790, and is a treaty, not the same as the "law of the land." It validates the rule of law in the United States, which gives freedom OF religion, not freedom from religion.houndawg wrote:youngterrier wrote: If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Paine
You are correct that the highlighted terms are not exclusive to chrsitians.
Regardless of their religion they agreed that "the United States are in no sense a chrsitian nation" strongly enough to make it the Law of the Land in 1790.
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
Only you and Olbermann, dawg.houndawg wrote:The Salem witches? You believe in witches, nate?native wrote:
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
1) My bad, 1797 is the correct date.native wrote:The Treaty of Tripoli was signed in 1797, not 1790, and is a treaty, not the same as the "law of the land." It validates the rule of law in the United States, which gives freedom OF religion, not freedom from religion.houndawg wrote:
You are correct that the highlighted terms are not exclusive to chrsitians.
Regardless of their religion they agreed that "the United States are in no sense a chrsitian nation" strongly enough to make it the Law of the Land in 1790.
2) All treaties are law, nate: "This Constitution, and the laws which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Article VI, section 2
3) Freedom of religion is freedom from religion.
The treaty was accepted by the Senate unanimously and signed by John Adams. There is no wiggle room, nate, this is a very clear picture of how the founding fathers viewed the subject, much to the dismay of the usual collection of crooks and control freaks that have spent the past two hundred years trying to force-feed the nation their whack job cosmology.
Last edited by houndawg on Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
...which you enjoy in great measure.houndawg wrote:1) My bad, 1797 is the correct date.native wrote:
The Treaty of Tripoli was signed in 1797, not 1790, and is a treaty, not the same as the "law of the land." It validates the rule of law in the United States, which gives freedom OF religion, not freedom from religion.
2) All treaties are law, nate: "This Constitution, and the laws which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Article VI, section 2
3) Freedom of religion is freedom from religion.
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
native wrote:...which you enjoy in great measure.houndawg wrote:
1) My bad, 1797 is the correct date.
2) All treaties are law, nate: "This Constitution, and the laws which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." Article VI, section 2
3) Freedom of religion is freedom from religion.
And wish to continue doing without input from the followers of our vast array of religions..
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- native
- Level4

- Posts: 5635
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:21 am
- I am a fan of: Weber State
- Location: On the road from Cibola
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
You are in absolutely no danger of losing your freedoms even if every conceivable conservative and Tea Party candidate wins in the next election.houndawg wrote:native wrote:
...which you enjoy in great measure.
And wish to continue doing.
-
houndawg
- Level5

- Posts: 25096
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
- I am a fan of: SIU
- A.K.A.: houndawg
- Location: Egypt
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
non sequitur much?native wrote:You are in absolutely no danger of losing your freedoms even if every conceivable conservative and Tea Party candidate wins in the next election.houndawg wrote:
And wish to continue doing.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31515
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
300 years ago the people here were British Colonist. But in the 1800's the US Army and Native American's mutilated the bodies of their defeated enemies which included beheading on occasion, and was not exclusive to combatants. The Native American's generally followed their spiritual beliefs as to where and what to cut on the human body, US soldiers for other reasons such as revenge, racism, etc. Books like "Son of the Morning Star" (Custer) go into detail about the mutilations. As far as burning people at the stake, just take a look at the KKK and African American history.native wrote:It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.Rob Iola wrote: Or burn witches?

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 69154
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
A vast majority of progressives are religious and a majority of progressives follow the teachings of the original progressive and probably more closely than the average tea bagger.native wrote:I take your points, YT, but the thoughtful, respectful and sometimes even religious Deists in the days of the Founders had a great deal more in common with the Tea Partiers of today than the "progressives" of today, who constantly show their disdain and lack of respect for all things Christian and religious.youngterrier wrote: If I am not mistaken, said highlighted terms are also deist terms, not just Christian alone. If I'm not mistaken, the term "Nature's God" was a term borrowed from Thomas Paine
I now know why you hate the enlightenment.
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
...and I though Paine was a cerebral ancestor of socialists and anarchists.kalm wrote:A vast majority of progressives are religious and a majority of progressives follow the teachings of the original progressive and probably more closely than the average tea bagger.native wrote:
I take your points, YT, but the thoughtful, respectful and sometimes even religious Deists in the days of the Founders had a great deal more in common with the Tea Partiers of today than the "progressives" of today, who constantly show their disdain and lack of respect for all things Christian and religious.![]()
I now know why you hate the enlightenment.
-
blueballs
- Level3

- Posts: 2590
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 7:00 am
- I am a fan of: Cap'n's porn collection
- A.K.A.: blueballs
- Location: Central FL, where bums have to stay in their designated area on the sidewalk
Re: Islam and the Intolerance Problem
Yepper, we had one as Speaker of the House for the past four years.houndawg wrote:The Salem witches? You believe in witches, nate?native wrote:
It turns out that more than 300 years ago the Salem witches were hanged, not burned, and that religion was only the excuse for the real motivations of personal power and jealousy.
Blueballs: The ultimate 'bad case of the wants.'





