Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Political discussions
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 62384
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by kalm »

Gil Dobie wrote:
houndawg wrote:
We'll see. Notice how the tough-talking sheriff is walking back his bellicosity now that the veterans are arriving en masse? Whole different ball game than shooting women and civilians now. Lots more to come once Trump jumps in to protect his investment. How many of those veterans do you suppose have an equalizer in their truck?
Haven't seen any evidence of women and civilians being shot. All I've heard is that North Dakota wants to make sure the protesters are safe since the cold weather arrived.
Gil, you're a reasonable poster so this isn't directed at you but I love how easily the government and MSM are trusted regarding this. From what I've read, they've had very few reporters on the ground up there and have been reporting the releases by the Sheriff's office.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

kalm wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
Haven't seen any evidence of women and civilians being shot. All I've heard is that North Dakota wants to make sure the protesters are safe since the cold weather arrived.
Gil, you're a reasonable poster so this isn't directed at you but I love how easily the government and MSM are trusted regarding this. From what I've read, they've had very few reporters on the ground up there and have been reporting the releases by the Sheriff's office.
I've been following the local North Dakota news reporters. These local people have been to the site and followed the protest in Bismarck at the capital. MSM has been leaning towards the protester side. That's how they get viewers.
Image
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10779
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Vidav »

Guys, I care even less about this pipeline than I do the Mexican border. I'm sorry for failing everyone. :cry:
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

Bismarck Tribune

This is despite continued winter weather warnings from government agencies and the tribal chairman. The governor ordered a mandatory evacuation of the camp prior to last week's blizzard, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers said the camp would close Monday due to the weather and confrontations with law enforcement. Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairman Dave Archambault II issued a video statement Monday requesting everyone go home in the wake of the army's decision to not approve the easement and to avoid the harsh winter.

All warnings have gone largely unheeded by the protesters, who want to see the pipeline officially stopped.
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

Some was peaceful, some was not.

Link

“We’re standing strong protecting the rights of the protesters that are doing it right and standing up against the ones that are doing it wrong," explained Laney. "We’re tired, yes! Want to go home to our families, yes! Proud, absolutely!”

“The misinformation and lies that would come out from that certain segment is horrible," stated Laney.

He said some protesters would publish the home addresses of law enforcement and encourage people to take care of business that way.

“The fear that was put into our families, our spouse and children that are now home alone because mom or dad are away over here. And to find out your address has been published and their encouraging people to go take care of business," said Laney. " They won’t focus on that if they have to worry about their homes. That is terrorizing and a lot of that happened. It happened to me and to my people.”
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

This was on AGS, where is Spanos?

link

The Dakota pipeline protests have become the frontline representation of the critical struggle against a completely out of control totalitarian power structure. Those in power cannot afford to allow this justifiable protest to continue or succeed. Geoengineering/weather warfare has now been added to the already long list of criminal assaults that have been hurled at the peaceful pipeline protesters. In the coming days and weeks, weather warfare will likely be the most deadly and effective weapon that the power structure will wield against the pieceful Dakota pipeling protesters.
Image
User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19496
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by SDHornet »

Gil Dobie wrote:This was on AGS, where is Spanos?

link

The Dakota pipeline protests have become the frontline representation of the critical struggle against a completely out of control totalitarian power structure. Those in power cannot afford to allow this justifiable protest to continue or succeed. Geoengineering/weather warfare has now been added to the already long list of criminal assaults that have been hurled at the peaceful pipeline protesters. In the coming days and weeks, weather warfare will likely be the most deadly and effective weapon that the power structure will wield against the pieceful Dakota pipeling protesters.
:lol:
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38527
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by CAA Flagship »

Gil Dobie wrote:This was on AGS, where is Spanos?

link

The Dakota pipeline protests have become the frontline representation of the critical struggle against a completely out of control totalitarian power structure. Those in power cannot afford to allow this justifiable protest to continue or succeed. Geoengineering/weather warfare has now been added to the already long list of criminal assaults that have been hurled at the peaceful pipeline protesters. In the coming days and weeks, weather warfare will likely be the most deadly and effective weapon that the power structure will wield against the pieceful Dakota pipeling protesters.
:lol:
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

Meanwhile back in Iowa near the Des Moines water supply.

Link

Beginning on December 1, continuing early into the morning on December 2, construction workers drilled through the river three times, after hitting the wrong spot twice. "Finally they got it done, and pulled the pipe through," says Raffensperger. "I think it took about 12 hours to pull the pipe through. And we stood there in the rain and protested, and defended water, and cried."
Image
HI54UNI
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12387
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
Location: The Panther State

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by HI54UNI »

Gil Dobie wrote:Meanwhile back in Iowa near the Des Moines water supply.

Link

Beginning on December 1, continuing early into the morning on December 2, construction workers drilled through the river three times, after hitting the wrong spot twice. "Finally they got it done, and pulled the pipe through," says Raffensperger. "I think it took about 12 hours to pull the pipe through. And we stood there in the rain and protested, and defended water, and cried."
Except that Des Moines gets its water from the Raccoon River and not the Des Moines River.

:lol:
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.

Progressivism is cancer

All my posts are satire
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

HI54UNI wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:Meanwhile back in Iowa near the Des Moines water supply.

Link

Beginning on December 1, continuing early into the morning on December 2, construction workers drilled through the river three times, after hitting the wrong spot twice. "Finally they got it done, and pulled the pipe through," says Raffensperger. "I think it took about 12 hours to pull the pipe through. And we stood there in the rain and protested, and defended water, and cried."
Except that Des Moines gets its water from the Raccoon River and not the Des Moines River.

:lol:
Frickin protesters can even get this one right. :ohno:
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

As expected, Trump will start to reverse Obama's decision on DAPL and Keystone.

Link

President Donald Trump will sign executive orders Tuesday advancing the controversial Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines, a senior White House official told NBC News.
The executive orders were set to be signed at 11 a.m. ET, according to the official. The substance of the orders wasn't immediately clear.
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Ivytalk »

Gil Dobie wrote:As expected, Trump will start to reverse Obama's decision on DAPL and Keystone.

Link

President Donald Trump will sign executive orders Tuesday advancing the controversial Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines, a senior White House official told NBC News.
The executive orders were set to be signed at 11 a.m. ET, according to the official. The substance of the orders wasn't immediately clear.
Sounds like Trump is starting a competition with Obama to see who can disregard Congress more.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60485
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Ibanez »

Ivytalk wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:As expected, Trump will start to reverse Obama's decision on DAPL and Keystone.

Link

President Donald Trump will sign executive orders Tuesday advancing the controversial Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines, a senior White House official told NBC News.
The executive orders were set to be signed at 11 a.m. ET, according to the official. The substance of the orders wasn't immediately clear.
Sounds like Trump is starting a competition with Obama to see who can disregard Congress more.
Obama has 8 yrs on Trumpvosky, but he sure isn't wasting any time. :lol:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25478
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by CID1990 »

Ivytalk wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:As expected, Trump will start to reverse Obama's decision on DAPL and Keystone.

Link

President Donald Trump will sign executive orders Tuesday advancing the controversial Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines, a senior White House official told NBC News.
The executive orders were set to be signed at 11 a.m. ET, according to the official. The substance of the orders wasn't immediately clear.
Sounds like Trump is starting a competition with Obama to see who can disregard Congress more.
True


I don't have a problem with using executive orders to rescind executive orders (you have to destroy the village to save it) but this is exactly the kind of BS Obama pulled
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

NOW people are going to start giving a damn about executive orders?

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18474
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by GannonFan »

CID1990 wrote:
Ivytalk wrote: Sounds like Trump is starting a competition with Obama to see who can disregard Congress more.
True


I don't have a problem with using executive orders to rescind executive orders (you have to destroy the village to save it) but this is exactly the kind of BS Obama pulled
Other than the shot across the bow for Obamacare, has he issued any executive orders of consequence that don't directly refute his predecessor's executive orders? Maybe the hiring freeze of government employees, but at least that one doesn't try to pre-empt something Congress is normally responsible for.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
Wedgebuster
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12260
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:06 pm
I am a fan of: UNC BEARS
A.K.A.: OB55
Location: Where The Rivers Run North

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Wedgebuster »

Well now that Trump dispensed with any notion that he did not win the popular vote, he rightfully feels he has a mandate from the electorate to dictate.


This ought to turn out just swell.

:coffee:
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Ivytalk »

Wedgebuster wrote:Well now that Trump dispensed with any notion that he did not win the popular vote, he rightfully feels he has a mandate from the electorate to dictate.


This ought to turn out just swell.

:coffee:
When does mountain goat season start?
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
Wedgebuster
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12260
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:06 pm
I am a fan of: UNC BEARS
A.K.A.: OB55
Location: Where The Rivers Run North

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Wedgebuster »

Ivytalk wrote:
Wedgebuster wrote:Well now that Trump dispensed with any notion that he did not win the popular vote, he rightfully feels he has a mandate from the electorate to dictate.


This ought to turn out just swell.

:coffee:
When does mountain goat season start?
You wanna go? Applications must be in by the end of this month..

:nod:
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25478
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by CID1990 »

GannonFan wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
True


I don't have a problem with using executive orders to rescind executive orders (you have to destroy the village to save it) but this is exactly the kind of BS Obama pulled
Other than the shot across the bow for Obamacare, has he issued any executive orders of consequence that don't directly refute his predecessor's executive orders? Maybe the hiring freeze of government employees, but at least that one doesn't try to pre-empt something Congress is normally responsible for.
Technically speaking, there haven't been any (yet), but by using an executive order to kill the TPP, he is nodding to the fact that it was not going to be routed through the Senate. There was no need for an executive order, just let it die on the vine.
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 24491
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by houndawg »

CID1990 wrote:
Ivytalk wrote: Sounds like Trump is starting a competition with Obama to see who can disregard Congress more.
True


I don't have a problem with using executive orders to rescind executive orders (you have to destroy the village to save it) but this is exactly the kind of BS Obama pulled
Trump is just protecting his investments
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18474
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by GannonFan »

CID1990 wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
Other than the shot across the bow for Obamacare, has he issued any executive orders of consequence that don't directly refute his predecessor's executive orders? Maybe the hiring freeze of government employees, but at least that one doesn't try to pre-empt something Congress is normally responsible for.
Technically speaking, there haven't been any (yet), but by using an executive order to kill the TPP, he is nodding to the fact that it was not going to be routed through the Senate. There was no need for an executive order, just let it die on the vine.
I agree, the TPP was dead regardless of who was elected President, and clearly the Senate was never going to bring it to a vote. I think it probably would've been beneficial for the Senate to vote it down, as it would re-emphasize the idea that the Senate has to approve treaties before they become real for the US, but that would probably be lost on people anyway. Trump's executive order here would be called goaltending in basketball - it was clearly in the cylinder and clearly on it's way down before he did anything.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31127
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by Gil Dobie »

As expected the pipeline continues. Looks like the protesters left more environmental damage than they prevented.

Image

Forbes Link

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has cleared the way for the completion of the final leg of the Dakota Access Pipeline system that has become a subject of controversy in recent months. The Corps filed the necessary documents in a U.S. district court in Washington, D.C. to grant the final easement it had been ordered by ex-President Barack Obama last December to withhold pending the conduct of a supplemental environmental review. The Corps also filed the required notice to congress about its decision to forego the review and grant the easement, as President Donald Trump instructed in his presidential order issued two weeks ago.

Meanwhile, efforts by local officials to begin cleaning up the tons of trash and human waste created by the protesters have begun in earnest, and videos and photos of the filth are beginning to make their way into the news media slowly but surely. One Morton County official estimates that it will take 250 large truckloads to clear the site of trash. A complicating factor to the cleanup effort is that much of the garbage is frozen in ice due to the harsh winter conditions.

"Standing Rock Environmental Protection Agency and Dakota Sanitation are working together to try and advert an environmental tragedy," Tom Doering, Morton County Emergency Manager, was quoted as saying. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has on several occasions expressed its concern about the practice by the outside protesters of using open latrines in what is a flood plain that, if left unaddressed before the spring thaw begins, would inevitably cause runoff to flow into waters that the Tribe uses for drinking water and other purposes.
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18474
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Feds won't evict Dakota Access Pipeline Protesters

Post by GannonFan »

I read that about the crap all the protestors left, including the danger of the runoff getting into the drinking water. That's the danger of protests - it's great to get rid of some pent up anger and energy, but it almost never leads to sustained, concrete positions and a view to the long term.

I'm not sure how I feel about greatly increasing pipelines throughout America - obviously at some point there's a fall off in terms of the return on investment. However, considering this pipeline was massive and pretty much done except for this one crossing (of which apparently there are already other crossings that lead to this place anyway) it always seemed like political cowardice on Obama's administration to let this one spot get blocked by protests.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Post Reply