Inciting a seditious mob. Intentionally obstructing the return of classified documents. Organizing fraudulent electors. Trying to bully state officials into overturning or not certifying election results.
trump isn't getting more popular. His base loves him and he's polling well with moderates/independents not because they like him but because they currently like biden less. That isn't popularity and it can change quickly.
First paragraph is so yesterday… nobody cares about the inserrection that just wasn’t. I totally agree that whatever happened that day doesn’t look good on Trump.
I agree he’s not getting more popular but if he continues to be reasonable and rational more will be pro Trump over the dimwit Biden…. Let’s face it, nobody like Joey Rotten
Inciting a seditious mob. Intentionally obstructing the return of classified documents. Organizing fraudulent electors. Trying to bully state officials into overturning or not certifying election results.
trump isn't getting more popular. His base loves him and he's polling well with moderates/independents not because they like him but because they currently like biden less. That isn't popularity and it can change quickly.
First paragraph is so yesterday… nobody cares about the inserrection that just wasn’t. I totally agree that whatever happened that day doesn’t look good on Trump.
I agree he’s not getting more popular but if he continues to be reasonable and rational more will be pro Trump over the dimwit Biden…. Let’s face it, nobody like Joey Rotten
IMO it was an attempted insurrection that failed. It might be yesterday to MAGAt yahoos who will forgive any transgression trump commits (and cry lawfare/witch hunt if officials attempt to hold him accountable) but failure doesn't mean it wasn't a violent and significant event and Democrats will be smart to make it a key point in 2024.
He's pretending to be reasonable and rational. The real trump will come out with a little bait. Then it will come down to a coin flip between the petty & vindictive dictator wannabe trump and the clueless biden.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Inciting a seditious mob. Intentionally obstructing the return of classified documents. Organizing fraudulent electors. Trying to bully state officials into overturning or not certifying election results.
trump isn't getting more popular. His base loves him and he's polling well with moderates/independents not because they like him but because they currently like biden less. That isn't popularity and it can change quickly.
First paragraph is so yesterday… nobody cares about the inserrection that just wasn’t. I totally agree that whatever happened that day doesn’t look good on Trump.
I agree he’s not getting more popular but if he continues to be reasonable and rational more will be pro Trump over the dimwit Biden…. Let’s face it, nobody like Joey Rotten
I don't know about that, he may have solidified the female vote with his latest political master stroke of declaring himself proud to have made abortion illegal. Chicks really dig confidence.
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.
"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
First paragraph is so yesterday… nobody cares about the inserrection that just wasn’t. I totally agree that whatever happened that day doesn’t look good on Trump.
I agree he’s not getting more popular but if he continues to be reasonable and rational more will be pro Trump over the dimwit Biden…. Let’s face it, nobody like Joey Rotten
IMO it was an attempted insurrection that failed. It might be yesterday to MAGAt yahoos who will forgive any transgression trump commits (and cry lawfare/witch hunt if officials attempt to hold him accountable) but failure doesn't mean it wasn't a violent and significant event and Democrats will be smart to make it a key point in 2024.
He's pretending to be reasonable and rational. The real trump will come out with a little bait. Then it will come down to a coin flip between the petty wannabe trump and the clueless vindictive dictator biden.
UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 11, 2024 10:21 am
IMO it was an attempted insurrection that failed. It might be yesterday to MAGAt yahoos who will forgive any transgression trump commits (and cry lawfare/witch hunt if officials attempt to hold him accountable) but failure doesn't mean it wasn't a violent and significant event and Democrats will be smart to make it a key point in 2024.
He's pretending to be reasonable and rational. The real trump will come out with a little bait. Then it will come down to a coin flip between the thin-skinned, tiny hands, petty, egomaniacal, sociopathic, vindictive, liar, cheat, rapist, dictator wannabe trump and the clueless biden.
Gotcha
Good
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Caribbean Hen wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 12:58 pm
Check my math college boy
That’s where your lesson of the day is
Your math is irrelevant, Gomer - its all right on film. Cops on both sides beating the fuck out of each other, it was like Christmas for Antifa
His point is that there weren't enough people involved for it to be a big deal. There were only about 7 people involved in John Wilke's Booth's assassination of Abraham Lincoln so that wasn't a big deal either.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
Your math is irrelevant, Gomer - its all right on film. Cops on both sides beating the fuck out of each other, it was like Christmas for Antifa
His point is that there weren't enough people involved for it to be a big deal. There were only about 7 people involved in John Wilke's Booth's assassination of Abraham Lincoln so that wasn't a big deal either.
1st it was the Civil War. Then Pearl Harbor. Then 9/11. Now we’re comparing Jan 6 to Lincoln’s asassination?
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
UNI88 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 1:12 pm
His point is that there weren't enough people involved for it to be a big deal. There were only about 7 people involved in John Wilke's Booth's assassination of Abraham Lincoln so that wasn't a big deal either.
1st it was the Civil War. Then Pearl Harbor. Then 9/11. Now we’re comparing Jan 6 to Lincoln’s asassination?
* assassination
I didn't compared January 6 to Lincoln's assassination. I used Lincoln's assassination to demonstrate that the severity of an event isn't determined by the number of participants.
But keep deflecting.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
His point is that there weren't enough people involved for it to be a big deal. There were only about 7 people involved in John Wilke's Booth's assassination of Abraham Lincoln so that wasn't a big deal either.
1st it was the Civil War. Then Pearl Harbor. Then 9/11. Now we’re comparing Jan 6 to Lincoln’s asassination?
Well the participants and certain members of Congress thought it was a civil war.
Well the participants and certain members of Congress thought it was a civil war.
MAGAt yahoos are going to do whatever they can to push the false narrative that January 6 wasn't a big deal.
And the TDSers will keep calling it an InSuRecTiOn and comparing it to the Civil War, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11..
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
The NY so called ‘Fraud’ case is a complete joke. 100% won’t stand on appeal.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
BDKJMU wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 5:52 pm
And the TDSers will keep calling it an InSuRecTiOn and comparing it to the Civil War, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11..
It was obviously an insurrection. Participants compared it to civil war too.
Uh, no, it obviously wasn’t.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
kalm wrote: ↑Fri Jan 12, 2024 7:15 pm
The 2020 election was obviously rigged
I agree.
There’s hope for you yet.
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
It was obviously an insurrection. Participants compared it to civil war too.
Worst insurrection ever. Didn't even bring any guns to the event.
Guns aren’t a requirement for violence but yes, it’s been proven there were guns at J6. Maybe not enough for your liking but thank god there weren’t more.
Worst insurrection ever. Didn't even bring any guns to the event.
Guns aren’t a requirement for violence but yes, it’s been proven there were guns at J6. Maybe not enough for your liking but thank god there weren’t more.
Link to this proof of guns? Legitimate links only.
kalm wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 9:40 am
Guns aren’t a requirement for violence but yes, it’s been proven there were guns at J6. Maybe not enough for your liking but thank god there weren’t more.
Link to this proof of guns? Legitimate links only.