Cluck U wrote:I don't really have a go to source. I Google things and then follow tangents. Foreign sources give great perspectives.
I also like reading the links some folks post (Chizzy likes to spout "facts" while pretending links don't exist

), and then following them down the rabbit hole. That tends to give perspective from both sides, and then you can bland in the foreign view point to come to the only logical conclusion:
Obama is not CHANGE. Chump change, maybe, but certainly not CHANGE.
Kalm asks about NEWs Sources and
1) somehow I come up as subject matter
2) Leading to "Rabbit Holes" of arbitrary reference
3) And then something about "bland" foreign sources..?
4) Then vague mention of logical conclusions
5) Closed out by extreme Obama neurosis (just for frosting on the crazy cake)
Yikes... you're sounding more and more like this guy everyday
