NFL 2021 Season

[dal4018]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

[GannonFan]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

Cardinals play some D, might not be as high scoring as you think. Packers may even want to slow down the game and keep the Cards offense off the field.

[Gil Dobie]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

No Davante Adams or Lazard for Rodgers to throw to tonight, Covid scratches.

[UNI88]

Carson Wentz
Team: Indianapolis Colts (#2)
NFL Season: 6th
Week 7: Led the Colts to a 30-18 road win over the San Francisco 49ers on Sunday Night Football … Completed 17-of-26 passes for 150 yards, 2 touchdowns, and no interceptions … Improved his TD-to-INT ratio to 11-to-1 this season.

Only important stat to me is that he took 100% of the snaps. Stay healthy, Carson, stay healthy.

I think 93 and every other Eagles fan wants 75%+ snaps.

[Winterborn]

Third in my Fantasy Football league without watching more than 5 minutes of a game.

[UNI88]

Third in my Fantasy Football league without watching more than 5 minutes of a game.

Third place is just the second loser ...

[93henfan]

Only important stat to me is that he took 100% of the snaps. Stay healthy, Carson, stay healthy.

I think 93 and every other Eagles fan wants 75%+ snaps.

Yup. Keep that glass-jawed stiff healthy. He's only made it through a whole NFL season twice.

I can almost guarantee a concussion or vaginitis flare-up by week 12. He's way overdue.

It'd be nice to pick up that third first-rounder so Howie can package them for seven 2nd round picks. Then he can pass on guys like Justin Jefferson and Tee Higgins and take sleepers like Jalen Reagor instead.

[Gil Dobie]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

No Davante Adams or Lazard for Rodgers to throw to tonight, Covid scratches.

Packers pull off a walk-off int, and then victory formation.

[dal4018]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

No Davante Adams or Lazard for Rodgers to throw to tonight, Covid scratches.

Yes I knew along with their D-Co-ordinator as well.Marcedes Lewis nearly made a GREAT ONE HAND GRAB in the end zone!!!!!!!!!!

[Mvemjsunpx]

No Davante Adams or Lazard for Rodgers to throw to tonight, Covid scratches.

Packers pull off a walk-off int, and then victory formation.

[dal4018]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

Cardinals play some D, might not be as high scoring as you think. Packers may even want to slow down the game and keep the Cards offense off the field.

AJ GREEN WAS CAUGHT NAPPING ON THAT END ZONE PLAY HE THOUGHT THE REFS WAS GOING TO BAIL HIM OUT!!!!!

[dal4018]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

Cardinals play some D, might not be as high scoring as you think. Packers may even want to slow down the game and keep the Cards offense off the field.

No Hail Mary to Jeff Janis last night to bail him out but they still won.

[Gil Dobie]

Cardinals vs.Packers once again I expect a obvious shootout Murray vs.Rodgers tonight on NFL NETWORK!!!!!

Cardinals play some D, might not be as high scoring as you think. Packers may even want to slow down the game and keep the Cards offense off the field.

Good call, kept Murray off the field with some long drives

[UNI88]

No Davante Adams or Lazard for Rodgers to throw to tonight, Covid scratches.

Packers pull off a walk-off int, and then victory formation.

Nice game by A-Ron.

[dal4018]

Cardinals play some D, might not be as high scoring as you think. Packers may even want to slow down the game and keep the Cards offense off the field.

Good call, kept Murray off the field with some long drives

Green was napping on that potential TD pass

[SuperHornet]

I was concerned with Buck's gross over-statement on LaFleur's coaching performance in this game, labeling it "masterful." It was anything but. It was LaFleur's goal line play-calling that should have cost Green Bay the game, and WOULD have were it not for Green's short "nap." Rodgers did everything humanly possible given the handicap of a horribly inappropriate formation and play call that close to the goal line, but he didn't get much help from either LaFleur or the OL, which had otherwise done wonders blocking for the backs in the middle of the field. I "get" this modern idea of spreading out the field in order to open up the middle for a draw, but that generally doesn't work at the goal line very much. In most cases, if you bring the ball into the backfield, either from under center or in the Gun, you're bound to get stuffed. The only play appropriate at the one and in is 10 Wedge. If you can't get one yard from the simple expedient of having your quarterback fall across his center's butt (yes, I'm exaggerating, because most QBs look for the hole before the snap and before they go), you don't deserve to win. About the only caveat to that would be to resurrect the Notre Dame Box, because BY FORMATION that puts extra blockers in the gaps. But I'd still prefer to go with sneak at the one. The options are a bit more open at the three; there, I'd prefer I Formation triple option out of a 3-TE wing set, perhaps with the wing back in back-and-forth motion. This throwing it into a compact box (the end zone) as close as inside the one is for the birds....

[SuperHornet]

A pic of Rodgers after drawing a roughing the passer call on a TD pass has pretty much broken the Internet. Before I saw what they were talking about, I thought it was his request for a horse-collar call on a previous sack. (He was right about THAT one, too, but the zebras blew it.)



https://sports.yahoo.com/aaron-rodgers- ... 06676.html

[UNI88]

A pic of Rodgers after drawing a roughing the passer call on a TD pass has pretty much broken the Internet. Before I saw what they were talking about, I thought it was his request for a horse-collar call on a previous sack. (He was right about THAT one, too, but the zebras blew it.)



https://sports.yahoo.com/aaron-rodgers- ... 06676.html

How? He grabbed him near the waist, nowhere near high enough for a horse collar.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

[SuperHornet]

Meh. It was about half-way up, and the yank made it come DOWN to the waist....

[Winterborn]

Third in my Fantasy Football league without watching more than 5 minutes of a game.

Third place is just the second loser ...

But the payout is enough for me to earn my money back with a bit of interest.

[Gil Dobie]

I was concerned with Buck's gross over-statement on LaFleur's coaching performance in this game, labeling it "masterful." It was anything but. It was LaFleur's goal line play-calling that should have cost Green Bay the game, and WOULD have were it not for Green's short "nap." Rodgers did everything humanly possible given the handicap of a horribly inappropriate formation and play call that close to the goal line, but he didn't get much help from either LaFleur or the OL, which had otherwise done wonders blocking for the backs in the middle of the field. I "get" this modern idea of spreading out the field in order to open up the middle for a draw, but that generally doesn't work at the goal line very much. In most cases, if you bring the ball into the backfield, either from under center or in the Gun, you're bound to get stuffed. The only play appropriate at the one and in is 10 Wedge. If you can't get one yard from the simple expedient of having your quarterback fall across his center's butt (yes, I'm exaggerating, because most QBs look for the hole before the snap and before they go), you don't deserve to win. About the only caveat to that would be to resurrect the Notre Dame Box, because BY FORMATION that puts extra blockers in the gaps. But I'd still prefer to go with sneak at the one. The options are a bit more open at the three; there, I'd prefer I Formation triple option out of a 3-TE wing set, perhaps with the wing back in back-and-forth motion. This throwing it into a compact box (the end zone) as close as inside the one is for the birds....

Packer fans were calling Lafleur an idiot for kicking a FG against Tampa last year in the NFC Championship, instead of letting Rodgers go for it on 4th down. Guess he can't please everyone. FG only would have put them up by 6, so he did the best he could we inexperienced receivers getting confused and causing a delay penalty.

[Gil Dobie]

Packers pull off a walk-off int, and then victory formation.

Nice game by A-Ron.

Mr Rodgerz to you.

[UNI88]

I was concerned with Buck's gross over-statement on LaFleur's coaching performance in this game, labeling it "masterful." It was anything but. It was LaFleur's goal line play-calling that should have cost Green Bay the game, and WOULD have were it not for Green's short "nap." Rodgers did everything humanly possible given the handicap of a horribly inappropriate formation and play call that close to the goal line, but he didn't get much help from either LaFleur or the OL, which had otherwise done wonders blocking for the backs in the middle of the field. I "get" this modern idea of spreading out the field in order to open up the middle for a draw, but that generally doesn't work at the goal line very much. In most cases, if you bring the ball into the backfield, either from under center or in the Gun, you're bound to get stuffed. The only play appropriate at the one and in is 10 Wedge. If you can't get one yard from the simple expedient of having your quarterback fall across his center's butt (yes, I'm exaggerating, because most QBs look for the hole before the snap and before they go), you don't deserve to win. About the only caveat to that would be to resurrect the Notre Dame Box, because BY FORMATION that puts extra blockers in the gaps. But I'd still prefer to go with sneak at the one. The options are a bit more open at the three; there, I'd prefer I Formation triple option out of a 3-TE wing set, perhaps with the wing back in back-and-forth motion. This throwing it into a compact box (the end zone) as close as inside the one is for the birds....

Packer fans were calling Lafleur an idiot for kicking a FG against Tampa last year in the NFC Championship, instead of letting Rodgers go for it on 4th down. Guess he can't please everyone. FG only would have put them up by 6, so he did the best he could we inexperienced receivers getting confused and causing a delay penalty.

I had no problem with him going for it on 4th down and IMO rolling A-Ron out was a good call. I didn't like the pass he tried to force into tight coverage but the play call was solid.

[dal4018]

A pic of Rodgers after drawing a roughing the passer call on a TD pass has pretty much broken the Internet. Before I saw what they were talking about, I thought it was his request for a horse-collar call on a previous sack. (He was right about THAT one, too, but the zebras blew it.)



https://sports.yahoo.com/aaron-rodgers- ... 06676.html

How? He grabbed him near the waist, nowhere near high enough for a horse collar.

Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk

Yes that was a horrible call against the Cards on defense that was not a horse collar!!!!!

[dal4018]

Well, not exactly, but the news is coming during preps for the 2021 Season.

The NFL is reversing an old rule banning alternate helmets starting in 2022. Because of this, we could see Tom Brady in the Doug Williams creamsicle Buccaneers helmet, Russell Wilson in the Jim Zorn Seahawks helmet, and Mac Jones in the Steve Grogan Patriots helmet.

No official word on what took the NFL so long. The original rationale was "player safety," but if the alternate helmet were made to the same standards as the primary helmet, then a safety issue doesn't really make sense. No word on why they're making us wait until next year, either. Perhaps just more Roger Goodell stupidity....







https://www.yahoo.com/sports/tom-brady- ... 57958.html

I personally like the old school uniforms as opposed to the current editions.