WORLD CUP 2010
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Do you love the vuvuzela but hate the soccer? Now you can enjoy them without having to sit through that damn soccer game
http://www.vuvuzela.fm/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.vuvuzela.fm/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Well, it looks like Argentina came to play. Going into the WC I was wondering if they were going to play up to their potential, unlike their qualifying matches. I even predicted they wouldn't make it out of the group stage. Glad to be proven wrong though. They are up 4-1 on SK, with a hat trick by Higuain (NOT Messi). 
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
South Korea had about a 25 minute period where the could of equalized and probably ended in a draw. I still think SK and Argentina out of the group. I like SK beating whoever the #1 from group A is too.bandl wrote:Well, it looks like Argentina came to play. Going into the WC I was wondering if they were going to play up to their potential, unlike their qualifying matches. I even predicted they wouldn't make it out of the group stage. Glad to be proven wrong though. They are up 4-1 on SK, with a hat trick by Higuain (NOT Messi).

Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Looking like Argentina and Germany are the class of the tournament - still very early though...
Proletarians of the world, unite!
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
I keep having to tell her my name's "Rob", not "God", when she rides me - stupid blondes...bandl wrote:Look what I found!
NSFWAnd this is the chick I was talking about. Sexy bitch.
- Spoiler: show
![]()
Proletarians of the world, unite!
-
tribe_pride
- Level2

- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:53 am
- I am a fan of: W&M
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Coach - put me in goal. I can do better than the English, Algerian, Greek and Nigerian goalkeepers. (sure there may have been a couple more). Too bad I'm American - not beating out Howard.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter

- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
You soccer pukes are evil fuckers. I just scrolled through 11 fucking PAGES of this drivel just to try to find more pictures of these two....with no luck!!!bandl wrote:Look what I found!
And this is the chick I was talking about. Sexy bitch.
![]()
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12

Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Sweet! One down, one to go.AZGrizFan wrote:You soccer pukes are evil fuckers. I just scrolled through 11 fucking PAGES of this drivel just to try to find more pictures of these two....with no luck!!!![]()
![]()
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45616
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Just like the Celtic vs Laker games - ASTEROID!!89Hen wrote:France v Mexico up next. Is there a way they can both lose?
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Mexico goes up 1-0 in the 63rd...
Looked offside to me.
I've certainly seen offside calls for less....
Looked offside to me.
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
2-0bandl wrote:Mexico goes up 1-0 in the 63rd...
Looked offside to me.I've certainly seen offside calls for less....
bye bye France... Not like they should even be here anyway.
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Not that I like France either nor the hand ball that got them in, but they still have a legit shot of getting through. Hope for someone to win the Uruguay/Mexico game next week while they thump South Africa by several goals. Of course, I'm rooting for the tie between Uruguay and Mexico to see them both through, but France has a respectable chance still.UNHWildCats wrote:2-0bandl wrote:Mexico goes up 1-0 in the 63rd...
Looked offside to me.I've certainly seen offside calls for less....
bye bye France... Not like they should even be here anyway.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Its almost impossible.GannonFan wrote:Not that I like France either nor the hand ball that got them in, but they still have a legit shot of getting through. Hope for someone to win the Uruguay/Mexico game next week while they thump South Africa by several goals. Of course, I'm rooting for the tie between Uruguay and Mexico to see them both through, but France has a respectable chance still.UNHWildCats wrote: 2-0
bye bye France... Not like they should even be here anyway.
Uruguay 1-0-1 3 0 4
Mexico 1-0-1 3 1 4
France 0-1-1 0 2 1
South Africa 0-1-1 1 4 1
Mexico has a 4 goal advantage in goal differential in a tie breaker. Not impossible, but it maybe safe to say its over for France. In any case, their chances arent "respectable"
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Who woulda thunk that France wouldn't have a single goal after 180 minutes? Love it.UNHWildCats wrote:Its almost impossible.GannonFan wrote:
Not that I like France either nor the hand ball that got them in, but they still have a legit shot of getting through. Hope for someone to win the Uruguay/Mexico game next week while they thump South Africa by several goals. Of course, I'm rooting for the tie between Uruguay and Mexico to see them both through, but France has a respectable chance still.
Uruguay 1-0-1 3 0 4
Mexico 1-0-1 3 1 4
France 0-1-1 0 2 1
South Africa 0-1-1 1 4 1
Mexico has a 4 goal advantage in goal differential in a tie breaker. Not impossible, but it maybe safe to say its over for France. In any case, their chances arent "respectable"
- State Line Liquors
- Level2

- Posts: 658
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:03 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Tiebreakers go 1) goal differential, then 2) goals for. Right now France is in the -2 goals. Mexico is +2 and Uruguay is +3. I don't intend to run through the permutations (since it'll give me a headache) but it's a safe bet that France is done at this point.
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Actually, the table I saw still just had the score 1-0 - the second goal is really a killer for France. And of course, they actually need someone to win that game, which is the real stickler in the whole thing. Although, with the way that Argentina is looking, you might see both Uruguay and Mexico go for broke to avoid finishing second in the group, so if France can explode offensively against a bad South Africa team... well, could happen.UNHWildCats wrote:Its almost impossible.GannonFan wrote:
Not that I like France either nor the hand ball that got them in, but they still have a legit shot of getting through. Hope for someone to win the Uruguay/Mexico game next week while they thump South Africa by several goals. Of course, I'm rooting for the tie between Uruguay and Mexico to see them both through, but France has a respectable chance still.
Uruguay 1-0-1 3 0 4
Mexico 1-0-1 3 1 4
France 0-1-1 0 2 1
South Africa 0-1-1 1 4 1
Mexico has a 4 goal advantage in goal differential in a tie breaker. Not impossible, but it maybe safe to say its over for France. In any case, their chances arent "respectable"
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
If they were playing a decent side, I agree, but South Africa isn't coming off as a decent side right now.State Line Liquors wrote:Tiebreakers go 1) goal differential, then 2) goals for. Right now France is in the -2 goals. Mexico is +2 and Uruguay is +3. I don't intend to run through the permutations (since it'll give me a headache) but it's a safe bet that France is done at this point.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
South Africa tied a team France just lost to, yes they lost 3-0 to Uruguay but is that any worse then France losing 2-0 to Mexico? Not many people had Mexico advancing from the group stage.GannonFan wrote:Actually, the table I saw still just had the score 1-0 - the second goal is really a killer for France. And of course, they actually need someone to win that game, which is the real stickler in the whole thing. Although, with the way that Argentina is looking, you might see both Uruguay and Mexico go for broke to avoid finishing second in the group, so if France can explode offensively against a bad South Africa team... well, could happen.UNHWildCats wrote: Its almost impossible.
Uruguay 1-0-1 3 0 4
Mexico 1-0-1 3 1 4
France 0-1-1 0 2 1
South Africa 0-1-1 1 4 1
Mexico has a 4 goal advantage in goal differential in a tie breaker. Not impossible, but it maybe safe to say its over for France. In any case, their chances arent "respectable"
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Plenty of people had Mexico going through - they actually have a decent history at making the round of 16, and it was a toss up between them and Uruguay by many for going through with France. It's not really shocking that Mexico could go through.UNHWildCats wrote:South Africa tied a team France just lost to, yes they lost 3-0 to Uruguay but is that any worse then France losing 2-0 to Mexico? Not many people had Mexico advancing from the group stage.GannonFan wrote:
Actually, the table I saw still just had the score 1-0 - the second goal is really a killer for France. And of course, they actually need someone to win that game, which is the real stickler in the whole thing. Although, with the way that Argentina is looking, you might see both Uruguay and Mexico go for broke to avoid finishing second in the group, so if France can explode offensively against a bad South Africa team... well, could happen.
As for the South Africa/Mexico game, eh, it's soccer, things happen. Especially in the first game of the World Cup. Since South Africa is even more out of it than France is, I wouldn't expect the same effort you saw on opening day.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- UNHWildCats
- Level4

- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
they're playing in front of and representing their nation... they will give 150%GannonFan wrote:Plenty of people had Mexico going through - they actually have a decent history at making the round of 16, and it was a toss up between them and Uruguay by many for going through with France. It's not really shocking that Mexico could go through.UNHWildCats wrote: South Africa tied a team France just lost to, yes they lost 3-0 to Uruguay but is that any worse then France losing 2-0 to Mexico? Not many people had Mexico advancing from the group stage.
As for the South Africa/Mexico game, eh, it's soccer, things happen. Especially in the first game of the World Cup. Since South Africa is even more out of it than France is, I wouldn't expect the same effort you saw on opening day.
-
tribe_pride
- Level2

- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:53 am
- I am a fan of: W&M
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
It was close but he was onsides. See the link below and then click on the arrow below the ball on the 64th Minute. They show it on the replay (don't wait for the real time goal but the replay they show afterwards). Great job by the sideline official.bandl wrote:Mexico goes up 1-0 in the 63rd...
Looked offside to me.I've certainly seen offside calls for less....
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/gamecast?i ... 901&ver=us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: WORLD CUP 2010
Anyone who watched the 2002 cup?bandl wrote:Who woulda thunk that France wouldn't have a single goal after 180 minutes? Love it.UNHWildCats wrote: Its almost impossible.
Uruguay 1-0-1 3 0 4
Mexico 1-0-1 3 1 4
France 0-1-1 0 2 1
South Africa 0-1-1 1 4 1
Mexico has a 4 goal advantage in goal differential in a tie breaker. Not impossible, but it maybe safe to say its over for France. In any case, their chances arent "respectable"




