
Should be good!
I don't think that last parade of gibberish requires a response.
Is there a reason you make the distinction "during or before" instead of after?
Thanks, Joe! That will brighten my Saturday, for sure!JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 9:02 am Here you go Ivy. Our boys from Dortmund travel to Wolfsburg for a match starting at 9:20 EDT on FS1.
Probable line-ups and a match preview is on the Bundesliga website:
https://www.bundesliga.com/en/bundeslig ... eyna-11166
US defender John Brooks plays for Wolfsburg. I know he's had a bit of an up-and-down season but I don't know the details. He had been demoted from the starting lineup earlier this year, but he's been starting again in recent matches.
Because TWO (just two) members of that team were later named in The Mitchell Report as having used PEDs. However, in both cases, the Mitchell Report stated that they had first used PEDs at a period of time following the 1998 season.
I find the German game, while technically excellent, to be unexciting. I really enjoy La Liga much more. The Spanish league is more open to individual play-making. I was planning a trip to Barcelona next August so they boys could see Messi play once at Camp Nous before Father Time soon closes the door on such a chance.Ivytalk wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 11:03 amThanks, Joe! That will brighten my Saturday, for sure!JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 9:02 am Here you go Ivy. Our boys from Dortmund travel to Wolfsburg for a match starting at 9:20 EDT on FS1.
Probable line-ups and a match preview is on the Bundesliga website:
https://www.bundesliga.com/en/bundeslig ... eyna-11166
US defender John Brooks plays for Wolfsburg. I know he's had a bit of an up-and-down season but I don't know the details. He had been demoted from the starting lineup earlier this year, but he's been starting again in recent matches.![]()
I don't follow the Yanks or baseball as well as others. Thanks.JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 11:43 amBecause TWO (just two) members of that team were later named in The Mitchell Report as having used PEDs. However, in both cases, the Mitchell Report stated that they had first used PEDs at a period of time following the 1998 season.
The report stated that Chuck Knoblauch first used PEDs in 2002, as his career started to decline, in what proved to be an unsuccessful attempt to keep his starter's job.
The report found that Andy Pettitte used HGH twice (yes, all of TWO times), while rehabbing from an injury in 2002. [Note that some doctors say HGH SHOULD be approved for rehab purposes as it has a valid medical purpose].
In any event, lying sacks of shit like GrannyTool -- merely because they are poor sports who root for other teams -- have tried to use The Mitchell Report to disparage the accomplishments of what is likely the greatest baseball team of our lifetimes, by claiming that "many" Yankees were named in The Mitchell Report.
Obviously, PED use AFTER 1998 had no influence on the 1998 results.
This is why have repeatedly asked GrannyTool to name one member of the 1998 Yankees that was involved in PED use BEFORE or DURING the 1998 season.
GrannyTool has not been able to identify one. That's because there is no evidence that would support that any member of the 1998 Yankees used PEDs during that season, or any time before.
Note that the team leader in HRs, Tino Martinez, was 38th overall in MLB in homers with 28 -- a paltry sum for a team leader in HRs in 1998. No player on the team had a suspiciously productive season.
Joe isn't be completely forthright. He first asked Ganny to name any member of the 1998 Yankees that used PEDs, he added the "during that season or before" later. I believe there were at least three members of that team who were linked to PEDs later. We don't really know if they were using them in 1998 or earlier.Ibanez wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 12:08 pmI don't follow the Yanks or baseball as well as others. Thanks.JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 11:43 am
Because TWO (just two) members of that team were later named in The Mitchell Report as having used PEDs. However, in both cases, the Mitchell Report stated that they had first used PEDs at a period of time following the 1998 season.
The report stated that Chuck Knoblauch first used PEDs in 2002, as his career started to decline, in what proved to be an unsuccessful attempt to keep his starter's job.
The report found that Andy Pettitte used HGH twice (yes, all of TWO times), while rehabbing from an injury in 2002. [Note that some doctors say HGH SHOULD be approved for rehab purposes as it has a valid medical purpose].
In any event, lying sacks of shit like GrannyTool -- merely because they are poor sports who root for other teams -- have tried to use The Mitchell Report to disparage the accomplishments of what is likely the greatest baseball team of our lifetimes, by claiming that "many" Yankees were named in The Mitchell Report.
Obviously, PED use AFTER 1998 had no influence on the 1998 results.
This is why have repeatedly asked GrannyTool to name one member of the 1998 Yankees that was involved in PED use BEFORE or DURING the 1998 season.
GrannyTool has not been able to identify one. That's because there is no evidence that would support that any member of the 1998 Yankees used PEDs during that season, or any time before.
Note that the team leader in HRs, Tino Martinez, was 38th overall in MLB in homers with 28 -- a paltry sum for a team leader in HRs in 1998. No player on the team had a suspiciously productive season.![]()
Ganny seems to have struck a nerve with you regarding the Yankees.![]()
I read through and gathered that. Also, it was over 20 yrs ago, who cares. There are more reasons than the 1998 season to hate the Yankees.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 12:17 pmJoe isn't be completely forthright. He first asked Ganny to name any member of the 1998 Yankees that used PEDs, he added the "during that season or before" later. I believe there were at least three members of that team who were linked to PEDs later. We don't really know if they were using them in 1998 or earlier.
That's not true. This discussion long pre-dates this thread and, whatever wording you're citing has to be taken in the context of all prior discussions.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 12:17 pm
Joe isn't be completely forthright. He first asked Ganny to name any member of the 1998 Yankees that used PEDs, he added the "during that season or before" later. I believe there were at least three members of that team who were linked to PEDs later. We don't really know if they were using them in 1998 or earlier.
Post from May 5:JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 3:22 pm Just for the record, I was called a very effective lawyer for my work in this thread.
And you still haven't credibly alleged a single member of the 1998 Yankees was using PEDs before or during that season.
But you're a Phillies fan. You're use to getting slaughtered like roadkill and claiming otherwise.![]()
I must have joined the conversation later.JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 1:42 pmThat's not true. This discussion long pre-dates this thread and, whatever wording you're citing has to be taken in the context of all prior discussions.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 12:17 pm
Joe isn't be completely forthright. He first asked Ganny to name any member of the 1998 Yankees that used PEDs, he added the "during that season or before" later. I believe there were at least three members of that team who were linked to PEDs later. We don't really know if they were using them in 1998 or earlier.
My point HAS ALWAYS been that no member of that team was linked to PED in a way that would have influenced performance during that season, i.e., before or after.
If you actually read The Mitchell Report, it EXPLICITLY states that Knoblauch first experimented with PEDs in 2002, as his career was winding down; and that Pettitte HAD NEVER used PEDs before 2002, when he was rehabbing from injury, and stopped after two injections.
As for Darren Holmes, he pitched an inconsequential number of innings for the Yankees in 1998 (51), and did not play in the post-season. According to The Mitchell Report, Holmes' use of steroids could not be dated an earlier than 2003.
Here are some other places where this has been discussed and, as you can see, it is always about "before or during" the 1998 season.
Post from May 4:Post from May 5:JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 3:22 pm Just for the record, I was called a very effective lawyer for my work in this thread.
And you still haven't credibly alleged a single member of the 1998 Yankees was using PEDs before or during that season.
But you're a Phillies fan. You're use to getting slaughtered like roadkill and claiming otherwise.![]()
And on May 8 at 2:46pm you modified that position to include the "during that season or any time prior to that season" ...
Just because none were implicated for use during or before 1998 doesn't mean it wasn't happening. Cheaters will be cheaters.
Yes. There's an interesting story to why steroids never took a foothold in the Yankee clubhouse of that era. I've heard this from media figures who cover the Yankees that I know from college.
Make or break game v. Bayern on Tuesday, 5/26 (12:30 p.m., FS1). A win draws the Yellow and Black to within a point of Bayern. A defeat will drop them to seven back, and will likely cause a slip from the current second place standing in the Table. Bayern had its way with Dortmund in Munich last November, a 4-0 thrashing, in the first of the "Der Klassiker" matches this season.
I'm not going to read the Mitchell Report but isn't a MLB roster about 30 guys? Did the report investigate all 30?JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 1:42 pmThat's not true. This discussion long pre-dates this thread and, whatever wording you're citing has to be taken in the context of all prior discussions.UNI88 wrote: ↑Thu May 21, 2020 12:17 pm
Joe isn't be completely forthright. He first asked Ganny to name any member of the 1998 Yankees that used PEDs, he added the "during that season or before" later. I believe there were at least three members of that team who were linked to PEDs later. We don't really know if they were using them in 1998 or earlier.
My point HAS ALWAYS been that no member of that team was linked to PED in a way that would have influenced performance during that season, i.e., before or after.
If you actually read The Mitchell Report, it EXPLICITLY states that Knoblauch first experimented with PEDs in 2002, as his career was winding down; and that Pettitte HAD NEVER used PEDs before 2002, when he was rehabbing from injury, and stopped after two injections.
As for Darren Holmes, he pitched an inconsequential number of innings for the Yankees in 1998 (51), and did not play in the post-season. According to The Mitchell Report, Holmes' use of steroids could not be dated an earlier than 2003.
Here are some other places where this has been discussed and, as you can see, it is always about "before or during" the 1998 season.
Post from May 4:Post from May 5:JoltinJoe wrote: ↑Mon May 04, 2020 3:22 pm Just for the record, I was called a very effective lawyer for my work in this thread.
And you still haven't credibly alleged a single member of the 1998 Yankees was using PEDs before or during that season.
But you're a Phillies fan. You're use to getting slaughtered like roadkill and claiming otherwise.![]()
But the Bayern Steamroller keeps on crushing all that lie before it.
They'll be hard-pressed to top Bayern. But they've got three teams on their trail -- and only the four top teams will get a Champions League berth for 2020-21.