Ibanez wrote:Did those buffoons really ask Christie about fantasy football? WTF? CNBC should be ashamed of themselves.
No. They asked someone else about whether what Fan Duel and Draft Kings does is considered gambling and should be regulated. Christie chimed in later to complain about a series of low substantive questions.
The article I read was out of context, obviously.
Still, that's ridiculous. Who gives a shit about regulating gambling!?
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
The Moderators asked Rubio about the Sentinel article and Rubio goes on and on about all these other candidates with bad voting records and how the Sentinel supported them. Uh, Rubio, those guys didn't represent Florida. Dumbass.
Ibanez wrote:The Moderators asked Rubio about the Sentinel article and Rubio goes on and on about all these other candidates with bad voting records and how the Sentinel supported them. Uh, Rubio, those guys didn't represent Florida. Dumbass.
But he said that the Sentinel endorsed that candidate in the election. I think that is what he was getting at.
At one point in the second half of the show, they started bringing in "guest" moderators. Were these people just fuckers thinking up shit in the hall of how to "gethcha". That first little weasel was a class a prick, and then was gone.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
Ibanez wrote:The Moderators asked Rubio about the Sentinel article and Rubio goes on and on about all these other candidates with bad voting records and how the Sentinel supported them. Uh, Rubio, those guys didn't represent Florida. Dumbass.
But he said that the Sentinel endorsed that candidate in the election. I think that is what he was getting at.
And moreover, never once questioned their voting presence....
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
andy7171 wrote:At one point in the second half of the show, they started bringing in "guest" moderators. Were these people just fuckers thinking up shit in the hall of how to "gethcha". That first little weasel was a class a prick, and then was gone.
Jim Cramer was one of them. He lobbed in a softball for Christie on the GM mess.
Rick Santelli is another CNBC personality (Chicago bond market) and he has long been very outspoken on the Federal Reserve's "power/influence". There needed to be a question in the debate on the Federal Reserve so they offered it up to him.
Ibanez wrote:The Moderators asked Rubio about the Sentinel article and Rubio goes on and on about all these other candidates with bad voting records and how the Sentinel supported them. Uh, Rubio, those guys didn't represent Florida. Dumbass.
But he said that the Sentinel endorsed that candidate in the election. I think that is what he was getting at.
He did. However, that Senator wasn't representing Florida. Rubio is.
BDKJMU wrote:
Myth The panelists were basically reading donk talking points.. Not only that, these idiot donk panelists continuously didn't have their facts straight & continuously had to be corrected by the candidates..
By all means, keep your head buried in Clinton's wrinkly snatch...
I know you're slow . Pull you're head out of Hillary's snatch for a second. Here's one for you. PROOF: NBC DEBATE MODERATOR JOHN HARWOOD LIED ABOUT RUBIO’S TAX PLAN http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism ... -tax-plan/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
I know you're slow . Pull you're head out of Hillary's snatch for a second. Here's one for you. PROOF: NBC DEBATE MODERATOR JOHN HARWOOD LIED ABOUT RUBIO’S TAX PLAN http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism ... -tax-plan/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Wrong again BDNUTJB.
weet two weeks ago acknowledging an error in his comparison of how the richest and poorest would fare. That tweet circulated again during the debate, with calls from frustrated conservatives demanding that he correct the error on air. But on air, Harwood accurately compared benefits for the richest and middle classes -- it was Rubio who chose to compare how the richest and poorest would do.
BDKJMU wrote:
I know you're slow . Pull you're head out of Hillary's snatch for a second. Here's one for you. PROOF: NBC DEBATE MODERATOR JOHN HARWOOD LIED ABOUT RUBIO’S TAX PLAN http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism ... -tax-plan/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Wrong again BDNUTJB.
weet two weeks ago acknowledging an error in his comparison of how the richest and poorest would fare. That tweet circulated again during the debate, with calls from frustrated conservatives demanding that he correct the error on air. But on air, Harwood accurately compared benefits for the richest and middle classes -- it was Rubio who chose to compare how the richest and poorest would do.
Wrong dipshit. Harwood cited a Tax Foundation study, yet:
"..because the head of the Tax Foundation was forced to publicly correct Harwood on Twitter during the debate. Here’s what Scott Hodge, the president of the Tax Foundation, said about the main beneficiaries of Marco Rubio’s tax plan:
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025