CID1990 wrote:Im getting a new motorcycle when I finish my tour in Nigeria.
A red Indian Chief Vintage
Is it going to have the gay leather tassels on it (as pictured)
or are you buying the mans version of that bike..?

CID1990 wrote:Im getting a new motorcycle when I finish my tour in Nigeria.
A red Indian Chief Vintage

actually mine will have MORE than are picturedChizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:Im getting a new motorcycle when I finish my tour in Nigeria.
A red Indian Chief Vintage
Is it going to have the gay leather tassels on it (as pictured)
or are you buying the mans version of that bike..?

Once again you comment without reading the article.Skjellyfetti wrote:It's not the name. It's the logo.bandl wrote:Apparently the team name "Indians" is offensive to the tune of $9 billion.
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-bas ... wahoo-logo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Whereas the Redskins is about the name... not the logo.

HI54UNI wrote:Will the US military be next?
Damn them for naming helicopters after Indians.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... pache-chi/
http://m.washingtonpost.com/opinions/si ... ml?hpid=z3
"the lawsuit will challenge that the team's name and Chief Wahoo logo are racist."Skjellyfetti wrote:It's not the name. It's the logo.bandl wrote:Apparently the team name "Indians" is offensive to the tune of $9 billion.
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/eye-on-bas ... wahoo-logo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Whereas the Redskins is about the name... not the logo.

I agree.Ibanez wrote:I thought of this last week when I saw some Apache's flying overhead. The US Military has named those vehicles for the honor and courage of Native Americans. There's nothing offensive there.
All recommended names must be received no later than 30 April 1977 to be eligible for consideration. All names are not acceptable. AR 70-28, dated 18 June 1976, specifies that Army aircraft should be given the names of American Indian tribes or chiefs or terms. The name should appeal to the imagination without sacrifice of dignity, and should suggest an aggressive spirit and confidence in the capabilities of the aircraft. The name also should suggest mobility, agility, flexibility, firepower and endurance.For brevity, it is suggested the name consist of only one word.

Yum. Got any gravy?Skjellyfetti wrote:My hometown AAA baseball team...
Montgomery Biscuits!!
Cower in fear of our mighty mascot!


Hmmm...CID1990 wrote:actually mine will have MORE than are picturedChizzang wrote:
Is it going to have the gay leather tassels on it (as pictured)
or are you buying the mans version of that bike..?
Audi boy

if all I have to worry about is being made fun of by some seattle commie pinko fag who plays in the major key too much I'd say Im goodChizzang wrote:Hmmm...CID1990 wrote:
actually mine will have MORE than are pictured
Audi boy
That's going to be a pretty "flamboyant" cycle there tough guy
Good luck with that

CID1990 wrote:if all I have to worry about is being made fun of by some seattle commie pinko fag who plays in the major key too much I'd say Im goodChizzang wrote:
Hmmm...
That's going to be a pretty "flamboyant" cycle there tough guy
Good luck with that

i have no idea what you are talking about other than that it seems you are channeling klam with your cryptic referenceChizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
if all I have to worry about is being made fun of by some seattle commie pinko fag who plays in the major key too much I'd say Im good
So basically you're admitting that everything we've been saying about the Gay Community at The Citadel is true then... (Right?)
I mean that's what I'm hearing...

CID1990 wrote:i have no idea what you are talking about other than that it seems you are channeling klam with your cryptic referenceChizzang wrote:
So basically you're admitting that everything we've been saying about the Gay Community at The Citadel is true then... (Right?)
I mean that's what I'm hearing...
but believe me- I am totally self realized... think of me as standing atop Maslow's pyramid not giving a fvck
especially about what people think about my choice in motorcycles


Chizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
i have no idea what you are talking about other than that it seems you are channeling klam with your cryptic reference
but believe me- I am totally self realized... think of me as standing atop Maslow's pyramid not giving a fvck
especially about what people think about my choice in motorcycles
I think this one is still available...

CID1990 wrote:Chizzang wrote:
I think this one is still available...
Yes, that's pretty, but it isnt a RED INDIAN CHIEF
and if somebody made a motorcycle named a SCREAMIN RED INJUN I would probably opt for that one over the chief
Chizzy, you're trying too hard.Chizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
Yes, that's pretty, but it isnt a RED INDIAN CHIEF
and if somebody made a motorcycle named a SCREAMIN RED INJUN I would probably opt for that one over the chief
With or without tassels..?

depends on what they are made ofChizzang wrote:CID1990 wrote:
Yes, that's pretty, but it isnt a RED INDIAN CHIEF
and if somebody made a motorcycle named a SCREAMIN RED INJUN I would probably opt for that one over the chief
With or without tassels..?

CID1990 wrote:depends on what they are made ofChizzang wrote:
With or without tassels..?
if they are made from leather made from the buttocks of indian children slain at Wounded Knee, then I'd say .... with
The Washington McCoys seems to be pretty popular right now.89Hen wrote:89Hen wrote: » Tue Sep 10, 2013 5:11 pm
What should it be? No way they make it to the start of the next season with the name Redskins.


Great call, buttfuck.bandl wrote:The Washington McCoys seems to be pretty popular right now.89Hen wrote:

The appeal, yes. The end result, not so much.tribe_pride wrote:Skins appeal gets a boost


I expect you to be even more grumpy and biter after next Sunday.89Hen wrote:The appeal, yes. The end result, not so much.tribe_pride wrote:Skins appeal gets a boost

Let's hope it doesn't go to the Supreme Court. They would probably rule the government action is proper in revoking the trademark because it is a tax, or some such other non-sensical reason.tribe_pride wrote:Skins appeal gets a boost yesterday as the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (out of D.C.) ruled in another case that the legal provision allowing the government to reject trademarks that are disparaging to a substantial composite of a group referenced violates the First Amendment. This is the same provision that the government used to reject the Redskins trademark.
The Redskins appeal is being handled in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (out of Virginia) so it is not bound by the Federal Circuit ruling but that ruling is helpful and if the circuits are split (have 2 different rulings), the Supreme Court would likely need to settle the dispute.
http://wtop.com/washington-redskins/201 ... me-battle/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Quite likely. The Eagles suck worse than the Skins at this point. Don't let 93 and the others tell you differently. As sad as the benchmarks are for the Skins, they did get the road win off their back as well as the two wins a row monkey. Next up is the prime time gorilla on their backs. I hope I'm wrong. I'd love to see a game like that one MNF game a few years back, Vick to DeSean for 90 yards on the first play and the Eagles just piled on the points.andy7171 wrote:I expect you to be even more grumpy and biter after next Sunday.89Hen wrote: The appeal, yes. The end result, not so much.
