Grizalltheway wrote:
Yep. If you can't handle the bantz, go be an accountant or something.
Everyone can "handle" it.... doesn't change the fact that many people think he's an asshole for doing it.
I don't particularly like his dancing. I'm more of an old school act like you've been there before kind of guy but I don't think it makes him a prick or an asshole. I think what it really comes down to is your perspective. Old guard types typically don't like his shtick.
Bottom-line, the guy's a winner. He won at Auburn and he's winning at Carolina. His teammates follow him and he makes everyone around him better.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
It will probably be difficult for MAQA yahoos to overcome the Qult programming but they should give being rational & reasonable a try.
Thank you for your attention to this matter - UNI88
89Hen wrote:
Everyone can "handle" it.... doesn't change the fact that many people think he's an asshole for doing it.
I don't particularly like his dancing. I'm more of an old school act like you've been there before kind of guy but I don't think it makes him a prick or an asshole. I think what it really comes down to is your perspective. Old guard types typically don't like his shtick.
Bottom-line, the guy's a winner. He won at Auburn and he's winning at Carolina. His teammates follow him and he makes everyone around him better.
UNI88 wrote:
I don't particularly like his dancing. I'm more of an old school act like you've been there before kind of guy but I don't think it makes him a prick or an asshole. I think what it really comes down to is your perspective. Old guard types typically don't like his shtick.
Bottom-line, the guy's a winner. He won at Auburn and he's winning at Carolina. His teammates follow him and he makes everyone around him better.
Pretending to be humble and actually being an arrogant prick (See: Brady)
vs.
Just being arrogant and not worrying about what people think (see: Newton)
and I kinda like 'em both for just that...
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Pretending to be humble and actually being an arrogant prick (See: Brady)
vs.
Just being arrogant and not worrying about what people think (see: Newton)
and I kinda like 'em both for just that...
Bully for you. My whole problem with this is that if you don't like Cam, you must be racist. There's no other explanation.
Think about NASCAR. There are tons of people wearing #18 gear and there are just as many who loathe the 18 driver. Neither is right or wrong, they just have different tastes in drivers. Hell, 93's son loves that prick in the 22.
89Hen wrote:Bully for you. My whole problem with this is that if you don't like Cam, you must be racist. There's no other explanation.
I don't like Cam and I don't like Manziel, for the same reasons. Difference is, ONE of those two backs up his arrogance, the other? Not so much...
Bingo..!!!
Arrogance backed up by strong game is actually kinda entertaining
That 85 Bears team were an arrogant bunch and they were awesome
The 2009 Saints were as arrogant as any team in history - yet somehow awesome
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
AZGrizFan wrote:
I don't like Cam and I don't like Manziel, for the same reasons. Difference is, ONE of those two backs up his arrogance, the other? Not so much...
Bingo..!!!
Arrogance backed up by strong game is actually kinda entertaining
You guys are over complicating it. Newton is a prick. Or a jerk if you prefer that term. I mean it's pretty obvious. If you act like a jerk the chances are pretty good you're a jerk. And he acts like a jerk.
I can't believe there is anybody that would even attempt to argue that he's not a jerk. Or prick. Or whatever term you choose to use.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star? Deep Purple: No One Came
JohnStOnge wrote:You guys are over complicating it. Newton is a prick. Or a jerk if you prefer that term. I mean it's pretty obvious. If you act like a jerk the chances are pretty good you're a jerk. And he acts like a jerk.
I can't believe there is anybody that would even attempt to argue that he's not a jerk. Or prick. Or whatever term you choose to use.
These guys are well played and glorified athletes. We have made them smug.
JohnStOnge wrote:You guys are over complicating it. Newton is a prick. Or a jerk if you prefer that term. I mean it's pretty obvious. If you act like a jerk the chances are pretty good you're a jerk. And he acts like a jerk.
I can't believe there is anybody that would even attempt to argue that he's not a jerk. Or prick. Or whatever term you choose to use.
I've never met him. He's an entertainer so I try not pass judgement on how he actually is without knowing him.
I'll bet he's less of a prick than Peyton Manning.
JohnStOnge wrote:You guys are over complicating it. Newton is a prick. Or a jerk if you prefer that term. I mean it's pretty obvious. If you act like a jerk the chances are pretty good you're a jerk. And he acts like a jerk.
I can't believe there is anybody that would even attempt to argue that he's not a jerk. Or prick. Or whatever term you choose to use.
I've never met him. He's an entertainer so I try not pass judgement on how he actually is without knowing him.
I'll bet he's less of a prick than Peyton Manning.
You haven't met either, so why would you make that bet?
JohnStOnge wrote:You guys are over complicating it. Newton is a prick. Or a jerk if you prefer that term. I mean it's pretty obvious. If you act like a jerk the chances are pretty good you're a jerk. And he acts like a jerk.
I can't believe there is anybody that would even attempt to argue that he's not a jerk. Or prick. Or whatever term you choose to use.
I've never met him. He's an entertainer so I try not pass judgement on how he actually is without knowing him.
I'll bet he's less of a prick than Peyton Manning.