Imagine if the guy you voted for in 2008 won.89Hen wrote:
He'll be hitting 80 here soon.

Imagine if the guy you voted for in 2008 won.89Hen wrote:

Yeah, but he's not near 80 over here.Skjellyfetti wrote:Imagine if the guy you voted for in 2008 won.89Hen wrote:![]()
He'll be hitting 80 here soon.

Eh, not really, even I didn't think what I was writing was all that groundbreaking. February is for making grand pronouncements based on very little, and often unimportant, primaries and caucuses. Trump, win or lose, can hang around at least that long. Iowa and New Hampshire are like inventions by the press to give them something to talk about and to winnow the field of the O'Malley types.Ivytalk wrote:Heck, that's brilliant analysis.GannonFan wrote:
I don't think Trump finishing second in Iowa was much of a shock to anyone. Like another poster said, Iowa is weird and it's all about the networking in state. And in the end, Iowa, especially on the Republican side of things, rarely predicts the winner for the nomination. We'll know if Trump has a legit chance or not somewhat after New Hampshire, and for certain after March 1st's Super Tuesday. The idea that buffoonery can transfer into votes will be known for certain by then and not really much before.

Republican caucus is private ballot. Dems are the ones that allow the shaming by publicly stating your vote.dbackjon wrote:GannonFan wrote:
I don't think Trump finishing second in Iowa was much of a shock to anyone. Like another poster said, Iowa is weird and it's all about the networking in state. And in the end, Iowa, especially on the Republican side of things, rarely predicts the winner for the nomination. We'll know if Trump has a legit chance or not somewhat after New Hampshire, and for certain after March 1st's Super Tuesday. The idea that buffoonery can transfer into votes will be known for certain by then and not really much before.
I also think the public nature of the vote has an effect - especially to transfer votes from Trump to Cruz or Rubio.
People may not publically want to admit they support Trump, but would vote for him in a secret ballot.
Cruz has the advantage of church shaming - the pressure from fellow evangelicals to support him at the caucus.

Ok - good too know.HI54UNI wrote:Republican caucus is private ballot. Dems are the ones that allow the shaming by publicly stating your vote.dbackjon wrote:
I also think the public nature of the vote has an effect - especially to transfer votes from Trump to Cruz or Rubio.
People may not publically want to admit they support Trump, but would vote for him in a secret ballot.
Cruz has the advantage of church shaming - the pressure from fellow evangelicals to support him at the caucus.

Wrong. If the election were held today Cruz would likely beat Hildacunt. RCP avg he is +1.3 over Hildacunt. The only other of the 11 conks ahead of Hildabeast in the RCP avg is Rubio (+2.5).kalm wrote:Cruz is unelectable in the general but I think he hurts Trump a little. The longer he stays in, the better for Rubio.HI54UNI wrote:
Cruz winning didn't really surprise me. It's a lot harder to get your supporters out to vote in a caucus than a primary. Trump really didn't have the ground game to accomplish that. The establishment has been beating on Cruz really hard the last couple of weeks, particularly over ethanol, which hurt his final number. What surprised me was the number that coalesced around Rubio for his final number.

BDKJMU wrote:Wrong. If the election were held today Cruz would likely beat Hildacunt. RCP avg he is +1.3 over Hildacunt. The only other of the 11 conks ahead of Hildabeast in the RCP avg is Rubio (+2.5).kalm wrote:
Cruz is unelectable in the general but I think he hurts Trump a little. The longer he stays in, the better for Rubio.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... _race.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I think he's right. I think Rubio is by far the best shot for Republicans in the general...by a bigger margin than the polls currently suggest. But I think Cruz would indeed have a shot. It would be a very polarizing election. But I think he'd have a shot.dbackjon wrote:BDKJMU wrote:
Wrong. If the election were held today Cruz would likely beat Hildacunt. RCP avg he is +1.3 over Hildacunt. The only other of the 11 conks ahead of Hildabeast in the RCP avg is Rubio (+2.5).
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... _race.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
LOL


bluehenbillk wrote:Cross another one of the list - Rand Paul is OUT.

Yeah, he's up for re-election to the Senate this year. Better to have something than nothing.bluehenbillk wrote:Cross another one of the list - Rand Paul is OUT.

bluehenbillk wrote:Cross another one of the list - Rand Paul is OUT.
In October, Paul embarked on an online event in which he answered hostile questions from Twitter users.
One asked if he's still running for president.
"I dunno," he answered. "I wouldn't be doing this dumbass live streaming if I weren't."

JohnStOnge wrote:I think he's right. I think Rubio is by far the best shot for Republicans in the general...by a bigger margin than the polls currently suggest. But I think Cruz would indeed have a shot. It would be a very polarizing election. But I think he'd have a shot.dbackjon wrote:
LOL
Cruz is sharp and Cruz is organized. He inspires intense emotions on either side. And unlike Trump he does have substance. He does have a real core of principles that he wants to implement.

This. Cruz has no shot against hildabeast in the general election.dbackjon wrote:BDKJMU wrote:
Wrong. If the election were held today Cruz would likely beat Hildacunt. RCP avg he is +1.3 over Hildacunt. The only other of the 11 conks ahead of Hildabeast in the RCP avg is Rubio (+2.5).
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls ... _race.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
LOL

LOLSDHornet wrote:This. Cruz has no shot against hildabeast in the general election.dbackjon wrote:
LOL

It was hard to tell that he was still in it.dbackjon wrote:Down goes frothy mixture!
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/03/politics/ ... ntial-bid/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Updated. Field has been cut in almost half. And really Gilmore shouldn't even count:BDKJMU wrote:The 17 announced candidates, 9 remain:
-Ted Cruz, U.S. Senator from Texas since 2013; Solicitor General of Texas 2003–2008. Announced 3/23/15.
-Marco Rubio, U.S. Senator from Florida since 2011; Florida Speaker of the House 2007-2008. Announced 4/13/15.
-Ben Carson: Author and former Director of Pediatric Neurosurgery for Johns Hopkins Hospital. Announced 5/3/15.
-Carly Fiorina, former Hewlett-Packard CEO. Announced 5/4/15.
-Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida 1999–2007. Announced 6/15/15.
-Donald Trump, business magnate and television personality from New York. Announced on 6/16/15.
-Chris Christie, Governor of New Jersey since 2010. Announced on 6/29/15.
John Kasich, Governor of Ohio since 2011. Also 18 years in Congress as a Rep from Ohio from 1983-2001. Announced on 7/21/15.
Jim Gilmore, former Gov of Virginia 1998-2002, Atty Gen of VA. Served 4 years in the Army (intel). Announced 7/29/15.
DROPPED OUT
-Rick Perry, Governor of Texas 2000–2015; Lieutenant Governor of Texas 1999–2000; presidential candidate in 2012. 5 years in Air Force, flew C-130s. Announced on 6/4/15, dropped out on 9/11/15.
-Scott Walker, Governor of Wisconsin since 2011. Announced on 7/13/15. Dropped out on 9/21/15.
-Bobby Jindal, Governor of Louisiana since 2008; U.S. Representative from Louisiana 2005–2008. Announced on 6/24/15. Dropped out on 11/17/15.
-Lindsey Graham, U.S. Senator from South Carolina since 2003; U.S. Representative from South Carolina 1995–2003. 6 years Army JAG, 26 years National Guard & Reserve. Announced 6/1/15. Dropped out on 12/21/15.
-George Pataki, Governor of New York 1995-2006. Announced on 5/28/15. Dropped out on 12/29/15.
-Mike Huckabee, Governor of Arkansas 1996–2007; presidential candidate in 2008. Announced 5/5/15. Dropped out on 2/1/16.
-Rand Paul, U.S. Senator from Kentucky since 2011. Announced 4/7/15. Dropped out on 2/3/16.
-Rick Santorum, U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania 1995-2007; Presidential candidate in the 2012 election. Announced 5/27/15. Dropped out on 2/3/16.


He says he has a major announcement tonight.Ibanez wrote:Is Santorum confirmed? I know he was supposed to come to SC today.

Don't be jealous.dbackjon wrote:He says he has a major announcement tonight.Ibanez wrote:Is Santorum confirmed? I know he was supposed to come to SC today.
So either he's dropping out, or he and Graham are getting married.

Not my cup of tea.Cluck U wrote:Don't be jealous.dbackjon wrote:
He says he has a major announcement tonight.
So either he's dropping out, or he and Graham are getting married.

FIFYdbackjon wrote:Not my cup of tea bagging.Cluck U wrote:
Don't be jealous.
dbackjon wrote:He says he has a major announcement tonight.Ibanez wrote:Is Santorum confirmed? I know he was supposed to come to SC today.
So either he's dropping out, or he and Graham are getting married.