SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Political discussions
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 47113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by kalm »

JohnStOnge wrote:I don't care what happened in the past. Just don't go along with allowing Obama to get a Justice on the Supreme Court to replace Scalia. I've heard talk that he might be able to do it anyway through some kind of "recess appointment" within a narrow window just before he leaves office and congress is transitioning. Though I'm sure he'd try that if he thinks there's any possible way he can "interpret" the Constitution to mean he can appoint a permanent Supreme Court Justice in a way that never involves the advice and consent of the Senate. But if he's going to try that let him try it and we'll see what happens from there. Do NOT cooperate with him in any way. He does not believe in following the Constitution and he's not going to select anybody who believes in following the Constitution.

Ok Good. Looks like he's screwed as long as they stand their ground and maintain enough seats in the Senate to block things through filibuster if the next President decides to try to re-appoint whoever Obama would stick in temporarily.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/is-a- ... an-option/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Do not let Obama replace Scalia. Just DON'T do it no matter what. They have the power to keep him from doing it and they need to exercise that power.
I hope Obama appoints his wife and Trump is elected president. I'd still wake up a go fishing in the morning. :nod:
Image
Image
Image

YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by YoUDeeMan »

dbackjon wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Nothing says class like dancing on the grave of an honorable man.

If it was about an honerable man I would agree with you


But anybody that compares me to a pedophile can rot in hell the fucking asshole bastard
Jon, one of your heroes was a pedophile. :nod:

Yup...you shouted out your support, right here on CS.com, for a fvcking child molester, you animal. If it were your underaged son that was getting azz fvcked by some perverted politically connected adult, you'd be horrified and you'd want the guy put in jail.

Instead, because he was gay, you give him a pass and praised his leadership and his election to public office. :ohno:

Oh, but he is gay...so fvcking under aged kids is OK.

No wonder some people think people like you are pedophiles...you are a shining example of a person with no standards, and it is rooted in doing ANYTHING, and supporting ANYONE, who praises and supports your lifestyle, regardless of their behavior and regardless of the damage done to innocent children or other individuals. :nod:

It is a good thing you are gay...God doesn't want your kind raising children. :lol:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?

YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by YoUDeeMan »

dbackjon wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
WRONG libtard. Reagan nominated Kennedy in 1987 for a SCOTUS vacancy that had come open in June of 1987 with Justice Powell's retirement. That vacancy was filled by Kennedy's confirmation in Feb of 1988.

Pwns was right- Its been 80 years since 1936 since a SCOTUS vacancy OCCURED during an election year.
No you fucking moron Kennedy was nominated in November 1987 not confirmed until February 1988

The longest a vacancy is ever been 130 days

President Obama still has 340 days left in his presidency

President Obama was duly elected twice he still the president is constitutional duty to nominate the Supreme Court Justice If the Senate will not follow their job and they should all resign
Narrow minded...par for the course.

Obama will do his job.

The Congress will do theirs. Their job is to confirm someone they see fit to wear the robe. If Obama puts up someone they don't want...they will do their job and not approve Obama's selection.

That's how it works...balance.

Of course, you wouldn't understand that word.

As for the longest vacancy...records were made to be Borken ( :rofl: ).
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?

Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 25506
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Ivytalk »

Cluck U wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
No you **** moron Kennedy was nominated in November 1987 not confirmed until February 1988

The longest a vacancy is ever been 130 days

President Obama still has 340 days left in his presidency

President Obama was duly elected twice he still the president is constitutional duty to nominate the Supreme Court Justice If the Senate will not follow their job and they should all resign
Narrow minded...par for the course.

Obama will do his job.

The Congress will do theirs. Their job is to confirm someone they see fit to wear the robe. If Obama puts up
someone they don't want...they will do their job and not approve Obama's selection.

That's how it works...balance.

Of course, you wouldn't understand that word.

As for the longest vacancy...records were made to be Borken ( :rofl: ).
"Borken"! Very good! This board is heating up, what with this post and DSU's classic "two fifths" post yesterday! :clap: :thumb:
“Sure. I was wrong.” — 89Hen 7/27/2020

∞∞∞
Level5
Level5
Posts: 11447
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:30 am

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by ∞∞∞ »

JohnStOnge wrote:I don't care what happened in the past. Just don't go along with allowing Obama to get a Justice on the Supreme Court to replace Scalia. I've heard talk that he might be able to do it anyway through some kind of "recess appointment" within a narrow window just before he leaves office and congress is transitioning. Though I'm sure he'd try that if he thinks there's any possible way he can "interpret" the Constitution to mean he can appoint a permanent Supreme Court Justice in a way that never involves the advice and consent of the Senate. But if he's going to try that let him try it and we'll see what happens from there. Do NOT cooperate with him in any way. He does not believe in following the Constitution and he's not going to select anybody who believes in following the Constitution.

Ok Good. Looks like he's screwed as long as they stand their ground and maintain enough seats in the Senate to block things through filibuster if the next President decides to try to re-appoint whoever Obama would stick in temporarily.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/is-a- ... an-option/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Do not let Obama replace Scalia. Just DON'T do it no matter what. They have the power to keep him from doing it and they need to exercise that power.
See John, I think this is what bothers me about the argument. You see it as Obama having an eight year Presidency, except he has not. He's had a four year Presidency + four year Presidency. The Constitution allows the People to elect someone every four years and in 2012, they did and Obama won. The Constitution also says that the President nominates Justices with advice from the Senate, but it doesn't say "except in the last year of his term." Obama appointed two people in his first term. Pause. It is now another term: he has all the Constitutional rights that the People afforded him in 2012 for four years. Not three. But four.

For the Senate to block any appointee just because it's his last year in office would be a mockery to how the Constitution works. The voters in 2008 are not the same as in 2012. If you are to deny the President an appointee because you don't want one man appointing three people, you deny the voice of the People that voted him into office in 2012. Sotomayor and Kagan represent the people who voted him into office in 2008; the new Justice should represent the people who voted Obama into office in 2012.

kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 47113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by kalm »

There are some very entertaining Facebook discussions on this. :lol:

Man are we a country divided. :nod:
Image
Image
Image

Baldy
Level4
Level4
Posts: 8492
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Southern

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Baldy »

∞∞∞ wrote:
JohnStOnge wrote:I don't care what happened in the past. Just don't go along with allowing Obama to get a Justice on the Supreme Court to replace Scalia. I've heard talk that he might be able to do it anyway through some kind of "recess appointment" within a narrow window just before he leaves office and congress is transitioning. Though I'm sure he'd try that if he thinks there's any possible way he can "interpret" the Constitution to mean he can appoint a permanent Supreme Court Justice in a way that never involves the advice and consent of the Senate. But if he's going to try that let him try it and we'll see what happens from there. Do NOT cooperate with him in any way. He does not believe in following the Constitution and he's not going to select anybody who believes in following the Constitution.

Ok Good. Looks like he's screwed as long as they stand their ground and maintain enough seats in the Senate to block things through filibuster if the next President decides to try to re-appoint whoever Obama would stick in temporarily.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/is-a- ... an-option/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Do not let Obama replace Scalia. Just DON'T do it no matter what. They have the power to keep him from doing it and they need to exercise that power.
See John, I think this is what bothers me about the argument. You see it as Obama having an eight year Presidency, except he has not. He's had a four year Presidency + four year Presidency. The Constitution allows the People to elect someone every four years and in 2012, they did and Obama won. The Constitution also says that the President nominates Justices with advice from the Senate, but it doesn't say "except in the last year of his term." Obama appointed two people in his first term. Pause. It is now another term: he has all the Constitutional rights that the People afforded him in 2012 for four years. Not three. But four.

For the Senate to block any appointee just because it's his last year in office would be a mockery to how the Constitution works. The voters in 2008 are not the same as in 2012. If you are to deny the President an appointee because you don't want one man appointing three people, you deny the voice of the People that voted him into office in 2012. Sotomayor and Kagan represent the people who voted him into office in 2008; the new Justice should represent the people who voted Obama into office in 2012.
That's funny considering Obama has made a mockery out of the Constitution since the first day he stepped into office.

kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 47113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by kalm »

Baldy wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote:
See John, I think this is what bothers me about the argument. You see it as Obama having an eight year Presidency, except he has not. He's had a four year Presidency + four year Presidency. The Constitution allows the People to elect someone every four years and in 2012, they did and Obama won. The Constitution also says that the President nominates Justices with advice from the Senate, but it doesn't say "except in the last year of his term." Obama appointed two people in his first term. Pause. It is now another term: he has all the Constitutional rights that the People afforded him in 2012 for four years. Not three. But four.

For the Senate to block any appointee just because it's his last year in office would be a mockery to how the Constitution works. The voters in 2008 are not the same as in 2012. If you are to deny the President an appointee because you don't want one man appointing three people, you deny the voice of the People that voted him into office in 2012. Sotomayor and Kagan represent the people who voted him into office in 2008; the new Justice should represent the people who voted Obama into office in 2012.
That's funny considering Obama has made a mockery out of the Constitution since the first day he stepped into office.
Thankfully the reign of terror is almost over!

Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
SDHornet
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 14606
Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by SDHornet »

dbackjon wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
WRONG libtard. Reagan nominated Kennedy in 1987 for a SCOTUS vacancy that had come open in June of 1987 with Justice Powell's retirement. That vacancy was filled by Kennedy's confirmation in Feb of 1988.

Pwns was right- Its been 80 years since 1936 since a SCOTUS vacancy OCCURED during an election year.
No you fucking moron Kennedy was nominated in November 1987 not confirmed until February 1988

The longest a vacancy is ever been 130 days

President Obama still has 340 days left in his presidency

President Obama was duly elected twice he still the president is constitutional duty to nominate the Supreme Court Justice If the Senate will not follow their job and they should all resign
I'm guessing you don't really believe that since I don't recall much outrage from you when Reid didn't bother bringing common sense legislation passed by the GOP led House to the Senate floor...but it's your guy so it's ok right? :dunce:

I will say, watching you get slapped around because of your unbridled bias is entertaining. :lol:

User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 23938
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by CID1990 »

dbackjon wrote:
CID1990 wrote:
well if your gay marriage is ok with "God" then I'm pretty sure the old testament is wrong about heaven and hell too

I don't need my marriage to be OK I need it to be OK with the Constitution

But you just pointed out one reason why he was one of the worst justices ever he was a ruling based on the Bible is not on the Constitution
oh!

im sorry

I could have sworn it was you, the secular or atheist queer, who said "rot in hell"

you getting the point yet?
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris

houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 17794
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by houndawg »

Obama is in his last year after facing scorched earth opposition for seven years, mostly because he's black. Now its his turn to fvck back. :coffee:

He will propose only highly qualified minority/female candidates that lean left and the JSO mentality will cost the conks election because of it. Being that he also has a highly developed sense of humor one of those candidates will probably be Anita Hill. :lol:

Well hello there, Clarence, would you like some of my Coke? :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:


This is going to be the most entertaining election ever. :notworthy:
Subvert the dominant paradigm

CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 37132
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by CAA Flagship »

houndawg wrote:Obama is in his last year after facing scorched earth opposition for seven years, mostly because he's black.
Says you.
Competency and sound decision-making means more to most Americans.
But you go ahead and keep playing the black card. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 55305
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Ibanez »

dbackjon wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Nothing says class like dancing on the grave of an honorable man.

If it was about an honerable man I would agree with you


But anybody that compares me to a pedophile can rot in hell the fucking asshole bastard
I don't follow every word someone says about issues important to me but when/where did he call you a pedophile?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 55305
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Ibanez »

BDKJMU wrote:
∞∞∞ wrote: Strike a nerve much? Does social change scare you?

edit: I don't particularly care if the Senate doesn't vote for a candidate until the next Presidency if that's the excuse they want to go with. But the GOP better win the election 'cause if it doesn't, the court will be liberal for many decades to come. It just won't be Scalia anymore...
No strucken nerve. :roll: Just responding to a :dunce: statement that the Republicans would look "horrendous" by not allowing Obama appointment.

Allow an Obama appoint = a liberal appointment
Appointment in 2017 = maybe a liberal appointment or maybe a conservative depending on the election results.
Of course you don't think the GOP would look bad. You're as bad a partisan as Dback.


It is Obama's duty to appoint someone, something Republicans should remember. God knows, if the POTUS was a Republican and the Dems wanted the appointment delayed until after the election, the Republicans would be losing their minds.


Of course, the GOP could shoot themselves in the foot if an appointment is delayed until after the election and they lose the Senate and White House.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18692
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by BDKJMU »

dbackjon wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
WRONG libtard. Reagan nominated Kennedy in 1987 for a SCOTUS vacancy that had come open in June of 1987 with Justice Powell's retirement. That vacancy was filled by Kennedy's confirmation in Feb of 1988.

Pwns was right- Its been 80 years since 1936 since a SCOTUS vacancy OCCURED during an election year.
No you **** moron Kennedy was nominated in November 1987 not confirmed until February 1988

The longest a vacancy is ever been 130 days

President Obama still has 340 days left in his presidency

President Obama was duly elected twice he still the president is constitutional duty to nominate the Supreme Court Justice If the Senate will not follow their job and they should all resign
My god you are a fucking :dunce: in addition to being a drama queen :rofl:
dbackjon wrote:Wrong Ronald Reagan appointed Anthony Kennedy in 1988 in his last year
I was resonding to you clearing being WRONG. Reagan didn't appoint Kennedy in 1988 in his last year. :dunce: He nominated him in 1987. Libtard.. :dunce:
BLM: Burning Looting Marxists

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 55305
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Ibanez »

Jon, do you not understand the difference between appointed and confirmed?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10681
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Vidav »

This argument is also really boring. Who cares when Reagan appointed anyone? That means nothing for this situation.
93 had something to do with this:
Image

User avatar
89Hen
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 36564
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by 89Hen »

dbackjon wrote:
Ibanez wrote: He was a real justice. Oh, that's right, anyone that doesn't share your POV is evil, bad, unreal and a piece of shit.


Such intolerance. :ohno:

He was intolerant of me. If Scalis had his way my upcoming marriage would be illegal

So he can rot in hell.
:thumbdown: And the one trick pony rears it's ugly head again. Shame on you Jon. :ohno:
Image

kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 47113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by kalm »

89Hen wrote:
dbackjon wrote:

He was intolerant of me. If Scalis had his way my upcoming marriage would be illegal

So he can rot in hell.
:thumbdown: And the one trick pony rears it's ugly head again. Shame on you Jon. :ohno:
Yeah! Gawdamm uppity homos with their one trick pony and egalitarianism! Who do they think they are? black???
Image
Image
Image

Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 25506
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
89Hen wrote: :thumbdown: And the one trick pony rears it's ugly head again. Shame on you Jon. :ohno:
Yeah! Gawdamm uppity homos with their one trick pony and egalitarianism! Who do they think they are? black???
And Klam dutifully carves another notch on his Donk belt. :coffee:
“Sure. I was wrong.” — 89Hen 7/27/2020

Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 55305
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Ibanez »

JohnStOnge wrote:I don't care what happened in the past. Just don't go along with allowing Obama to get a Justice on the Supreme Court to replace Scalia. I've heard talk that he might be able to do it anyway through some kind of "recess appointment" within a narrow window just before he leaves office and congress is transitioning. Though I'm sure he'd try that if he thinks there's any possible way he can "interpret" the Constitution to mean he can appoint a permanent Supreme Court Justice in a way that never involves the advice and consent of the Senate. But if he's going to try that let him try it and we'll see what happens from there. Do NOT cooperate with him in any way. He does not believe in following the Constitution and he's not going to select anybody who believes in following the Constitution.

Ok Good. Looks like he's screwed as long as they stand their ground and maintain enough seats in the Senate to block things through filibuster if the next President decides to try to re-appoint whoever Obama would stick in temporarily.

http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/02/is-a- ... an-option/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Do not let Obama replace Scalia. Just DON'T do it no matter what. They have the power to keep him from doing it and they need to exercise that power.
As someone that believes in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, you have no problem with Obama fulfilling his Constitutional duty of appointing someone. Correct?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17

User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 54199
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by AZGrizFan »

Ivytalk wrote:
kalm wrote:
Yeah! Gawdamm uppity homos with their one trick pony and egalitarianism! Who do they think they are? black???
And Klam dutifully carves another notch on his Donk belt. :coffee:
:lol:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image

kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 47113
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by kalm »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Ivytalk wrote: And Klam dutifully carves another notch on his freedom belt. :coffee:
:lol:
FIFY.

:coffee:
Image
Image
Image

Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 25506
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Ivytalk »

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: :lol:
FIFY.

:coffee:
Re-FIFY! :mrgreen:

Heh-heh-heh, he said "garter belt."

No homo. :coffee:
“Sure. I was wrong.” — 89Hen 7/27/2020

User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19272
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Soon to be Eden Prairie...

Re: SCALIA DEAD!!!!!!!

Post by Chizzang »

As a straight / White / Male with no Religious affiliation
or desire to restrict anybody else's freedom... I don't care who's on the supreme court

I will go the rest of my days (as the above described)
and never have to give a rats ass about the supreme court or there rulings

ZERO Effect on ME

:coffee:
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus

Post Reply