Ah Cid, it's OK. I give props when you make a funny too.CID1990 wrote:Chizzang wrote:Thank you Jon,
I think my work is done here
Hmm
1. Trolly posting to deflect from the factual conversation
2. Winkin, Blinkin and Stinkin (HD, klam and Jon) piling on (because they suffer so many beatdowns I do feel they need to occasionally have a laugh at my expense)
3. D1B hasn't been seen in some time
I believe somebody needs to call Clitsaurus and tell him D may have gotten his password
Definitely up there with ASU's "HOT HOT HOT" video.dbackjon wrote:10. Looks like a Meeting of The Citadel Fisting Club.Chizzang wrote:
Right...
Okay so next
How gay, from one to ten (one being the least gay and Ten being the most gay) would you rate this image
ASUG8 wrote:Definitely up there with ASU's "HOT HOT HOT" video.dbackjon wrote:
10. Looks like a Meeting of The Citadel Fisting Club.
at you trying to find something that will beat Hot, Hot, Hot, or at least on the same level. 
DudeASUG8 wrote:Definitely up there with ASU's "HOT HOT HOT" video.dbackjon wrote:
10. Looks like a Meeting of The Citadel Fisting Club.
Yup, which is something we still haven't heard from Trump. All we get is "I'm a good negotiator and I'm better than you, look at my polls". That's great Donald, but how exactly will you get it done? He was close to putting together some details on the Mexico wall but didn't quite connect the dots...maybe next time...CAA Flagship wrote:From the beginning of the campaign cycle, I have been trying to pay attention to the substance and details. In reality, none of that matters. All that matters is hearing what areas the candidate will focus on and what the goal would be. How he gets there does not matter now because all of the information is not known by anyone at this point in time.SDHornet wrote:Entertainment aside, this went as expected. Rubio and Cruz smacked Trump around. Trump countered with "everybody loves me" and "I'm better than you" and "look at my polls". Zero substance, no details, just more of the same.
Rubio landed some solid haymakers. Great one liners too.
Cruz did better than I thought.
Liked what Kasich said...well except for his nation building idea.
Why is Carson still in this?
Moderators were pathetic. Why they even had moderators for this debate is beyond me.
If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you
The most dishonest person in America is a woman who is about to be president, that can get me. My party's gone bats--- crazy
Maybe he should try standup when he leaves office.Ibanez wrote:Lindsey Graham had a good night
If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict youThe most dishonest person in America is a woman who is about to be president, that can get me. My party's gone bats--- crazy
CID1990 wrote:Chizzang wrote:Thank you Jon,
I think my work is done here
Hmm
1. Trolly posting to deflect from the factual conversation
2. Winkin, Blinkin and Stinkin (HD, klam and Jon) piling on (because they suffer so many beatdowns I do feel they need to occasionally have a laugh at my expense)
3. D1B hasn't been seen in some time
I believe somebody needs to call Clitsaurus and tell him D may have gotten his password
Again, the details do not really matter. Who among the voting public knows the best way to handle any of the issues? Nobody knows what all the tools and/or restrictions are. Illegal immigration, trade pacts, Planned Parenthood, ISIS, Iran deal, budget, taxes, debt, etc., etc., etc. Once a person becomes POTUS, they sit him down and begin laying out all the secrets. Whatever "plan" they may have had during the campaign may be shot full of holes once they determine all the levels of resistance. The only thing we can truly go with is the general goal. How they get there, or what percentage of that goal they are able to achieve, will be dependent on having all the facts laid out in front of him. So don't get too hung up on the details.SDHornet wrote:Yup, which is something we still haven't heard from Trump. All we get is "I'm a good negotiator and I'm better than you, look at my polls". That's great Donald, but how exactly will you get it done? He was close to putting together some details on the Mexico wall but didn't quite connect the dots...maybe next time...CAA Flagship wrote: From the beginning of the campaign cycle, I have been trying to pay attention to the substance and details. In reality, none of that matters. All that matters is hearing what areas the candidate will focus on and what the goal would be. How he gets there does not matter now because all of the information is not known by anyone at this point in time.
I agree but I'm not saying he needs to layout the nitty gritty details. A general concept would be nice, certainly more than "I'm a better negotiator than you are, I'm great".CAA Flagship wrote:Again, the details do not really matter. Who among the voting public knows the best way to handle any of the issues? Nobody knows what all the tools and/or restrictions are. Illegal immigration, trade pacts, Planned Parenthood, ISIS, Iran deal, budget, taxes, debt, etc., etc., etc. Once a person becomes POTUS, they sit him down and begin laying out all the secrets. Whatever "plan" they may have had during the campaign may be shot full of holes once they determine all the levels of resistance. The only thing we can truly go with is the general goal. How they get there, or what percentage of that goal they are able to achieve, will be dependent on having all the facts laid out in front of him. So don't get too hung up on the details.SDHornet wrote: Yup, which is something we still haven't heard from Trump. All we get is "I'm a good negotiator and I'm better than you, look at my polls". That's great Donald, but how exactly will you get it done? He was close to putting together some details on the Mexico wall but didn't quite connect the dots...maybe next time...
Dude, read The Art of The Deal. It's all in there.SDHornet wrote:I agree but I'm not saying he needs to layout the nitty gritty details. A general concept would be nice, certainly more than "I'm a better negotiator than you are, I'm great".CAA Flagship wrote: Again, the details do not really matter. Who among the voting public knows the best way to handle any of the issues? Nobody knows what all the tools and/or restrictions are. Illegal immigration, trade pacts, Planned Parenthood, ISIS, Iran deal, budget, taxes, debt, etc., etc., etc. Once a person becomes POTUS, they sit him down and begin laying out all the secrets. Whatever "plan" they may have had during the campaign may be shot full of holes once they determine all the levels of resistance. The only thing we can truly go with is the general goal. How they get there, or what percentage of that goal they are able to achieve, will be dependent on having all the facts laid out in front of him. So don't get too hung up on the details.
Trump's new acolytes are probably buying that book by the thousands. They're financing Trumpster's campaign!Ibanez wrote:Dude, read The Art of The Deal. It's all in there.SDHornet wrote: I agree but I'm not saying he needs to layout the nitty gritty details. A general concept would be nice, certainly more than "I'm a better negotiator than you are, I'm great".
I'm referring to the candidate who's a plant by the communist Castro regime.BDKJMU wrote:Why do you want to investigate Obama? I mean as much as you suck his cock on here..Or is it Bernie you are referring to?houndawg wrote:
First we must investigate this potential communist sympathizer thoroughly.
You missed them at their best! I was waiting for Trump to reach to each side like Moe and bang their heads together..kalm wrote:Damn. Sorry I missed it! Guess I'll have to wait till morning to get an honest review.
Says the guy who actually thought the donk establishment was going to give bernie a chance.houndawg wrote:You missed them at their best! I was waiting for Trump to reach to each side like Moe and bang their heads together..kalm wrote:Damn. Sorry I missed it! Guess I'll have to wait till morning to get an honest review.
This is the cream of the Republican crop and they wonder why they are getting their jazz kicked by a professional buffoon?
Carson could have been replaced by a ficus and nobody would have noticed.
The problem with a candidate actually providing a road map to their plans if they get into office...everyone knows that Presidents don't bother adhering to those plans once they get into office.SDHornet wrote:I agree but I'm not saying he needs to layout the nitty gritty details. A general concept would be nice, certainly more than "I'm a better negotiator than you are, I'm great".CAA Flagship wrote: Again, the details do not really matter. Who among the voting public knows the best way to handle any of the issues? Nobody knows what all the tools and/or restrictions are. Illegal immigration, trade pacts, Planned Parenthood, ISIS, Iran deal, budget, taxes, debt, etc., etc., etc. Once a person becomes POTUS, they sit him down and begin laying out all the secrets. Whatever "plan" they may have had during the campaign may be shot full of holes once they determine all the levels of resistance. The only thing we can truly go with is the general goal. How they get there, or what percentage of that goal they are able to achieve, will be dependent on having all the facts laid out in front of him. So don't get too hung up on the details.
Hillary...known to be a vindictive lying beyotch who will say anything to gain power...and she's the front runner for the Dems. Fair points. Thing is the donk establishment rigged their system to ensure a guy like bernie doesn't sniff the nominations. conk establishment might do the same thing after this Trump ordeal.Cluck U wrote:The problem with a candidate actually providing a road map to their plans if they get into office...everyone knows that Presidents don't bother adhering to those plans once they get into office.SDHornet wrote: I agree but I'm not saying he needs to layout the nitty gritty details. A general concept would be nice, certainly more than "I'm a better negotiator than you are, I'm great".
Close Gitmo? Troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq? Punish Wall Street? Help the middle class?
Seriously, no wonder people no longer want to listen to campaign promises...the candidates are simply lying their azzes off. Hillary...says she always was clear on gay rights.
As I've said, I would LOVE to have Trump versus Bernie. Split the parties from their extremists and maybe we can get on with helping our country instead of catering to the whack jobs in our country and those around the world.
We need a third party...badly.
I thought Christie wanted the entertainment portion to end?CAA Flagship wrote:Chris Christie has officially endorsed Trump at a press conference minutes ago.
Thought? He still thinks Burney has a chance.SDHornet wrote:Says the guy who actually thought the donk establishment was going to give bernie a chance.houndawg wrote:
You missed them at their best! I was waiting for Trump to reach to each side like Moe and bang their heads together..
This is the cream of the Republican crop and they wonder why they are getting their jazz kicked by a professional buffoon?
Carson could have been replaced by a ficus and nobody would have noticed.
If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you...Ibanez wrote:I thought Christie wanted the entertainment portion to end?CAA Flagship wrote:Chris Christie has officially endorsed Trump at a press conference minutes ago.
Any major cities nearby?Cluck U wrote:If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you...Ibanez wrote: I thought Christie wanted the entertainment portion to end?
...traffic conditions are not considered part of the bridge sale, can't be guaranteed to be optimal, and are subject to separate negotiations based upon local laws, political jurisdictions, road work assignments and contracts
Flint, MichiganIbanez wrote:Any major cities nearby?Cluck U wrote:
If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you...
East coast, represent! Recognize.CAA Flagship wrote:Chris Christie has officially endorsed Trump at a press conference minutes ago.
