Maniacal Muzzies Make More Mayhem (Brussels Edition)

[CID1990]

Before you can eradicate your enemy you have to be able to fully acknowledge him for who he is.

This President is much more comfortable lecturing the little people like you and me about islamophobia than he is about uttering the words "islamic terrorism"

But we can't eradicate this enemy. They aren't conventional. The best we can hope for, IMO, is to deal such a blow that their ability and desire to wage war would be greatly diminished. A significant blow to ISIS could discourage followers for the time being but we can't eradicate the threat. It's not like eradicating the Nazis or the Fascists in Italy.

If I had said "defeated" would that have spared me the lecture on asymmetrical warfare?

[BDKJMU]

Irony?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL7hvXeOAKw[/youtube]

Comments are classic! Am I wrong for ?

[Ibanez]

But we can't eradicate this enemy. They aren't conventional. The best we can hope for, IMO, is to deal such a blow that their ability and desire to wage war would be greatly diminished. A significant blow to ISIS could discourage followers for the time being but we can't eradicate the threat. It's not like eradicating the Nazis or the Fascists in Italy.

If I had said "defeated" would that have spared me the lecture on asymmetrical warfare?

No because, again, you can't defeat them. It's whack-a-mole.


It wasn't a lecture. It's a statement of fact. I didn't take your Sun Tzu-esque, "know your enemy" statement as a lecture.

You tell me how we defeat Islamic extremists.

[93henfan]

You tell me how we defeat Islamic extremists.

[Ibanez]

You tell me how we defeat Islamic extremists.

John Rambo!

[ASUG8]

You can't beat these guys when they're holed up in schools, hospitals, and other civilian populations while we abide by Geneva Convention guidelines, Rules of Engagement, and openly wear uniforms identifying us as military.

[CAA Flagship]

Putting a name on the terrorists is one thing. Spotting them is another.



Shouldn't we be looking in Montana for guys that look like this?

[Ivytalk]

I thought we'd have seen the "moderate Muslin" perspective from Bro Trips by now. Guess not: he's too busy with the GOP primary thread.

[Ivytalk]

And there's this:

http://www.theonion.com/article/nationa ... hole-52618

[YoUDeeMan]

And that fucktard in the white house still won't utter the words islamic or muslim terrorist/terrorism.

Does it really matter? It's terrorism and he has stated that. Does the qualifier really matter at this point? We know what it is.

Yes, it matters.

We should be able to talk about things openly and factually. That is how intelligent, rational people engage in conversation.

[Ibanez]

Does it really matter? It's terrorism and he has stated that. Does the qualifier really matter at this point? We know what it is.

Yes, it matters.

We should be able to talk about things openly and factually. That is how intelligent, rational people engage in conversation.

We know he's playing politics by not saying it however we are all aware of who and what ISIS is.

[YoUDeeMan]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_ZoroJdVnA[/youtube]

Yet another "But Bush..." justification for Obama's fuck ups

When will people allow him to actually OWN his mistakes? Instead of immediately falling back to the "Well Bush did/didn't do this first, then that makes it okay."

A lot of Obama supporters, deep down inside, don't think of Obama as a man. They believe he is a child and his faults are to be blamed on someone else. In fact, deep, deep. deep down inside, most of Obama's supporters must believe Obama is just a Black man incapable of making informed, intelligent decisions on his own...Obama is simply a slave to the previous administration. Therefor, everything is Bush's fault.

[YoUDeeMan]

Irony?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL7hvXeOAKw[/youtube]

When I opt to play that vid, it says the video is private.


Look out your window for Blackhawks.

[YoUDeeMan]

"Coming soon: More immigrants from Muslim nations than population of D.C. — 680,000

.....Figures from the Department of Homeland Security show that the president has already issued 680,000 green cards to immigrants from Muslim nations over the past five years. Unless Congress changes his policy, that number will be repeated in the next five years.

What's more, the president is also planning to add over 100,000 more with refugee status, many from Syria. Refugees can also petition the government for their relatives.

DHS data released by the Sen. Jeff Sessions' Judiciary subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, noted that refugees, who must apply for a green card within one year, have instant access to federal welfare and entitlements, along with local benefits and education services; these costs are not offset.

The DHS number of 680,000 does not include temporary migrants who return home nor births or deaths.

The subcommittee said that "assuming no change in visa policy, the U.S. can expect to give green cards to another 680,000 more migrants from these countries over the next five years. A green card entitles recipients to access federal benefits, lifetime residency, work authorization, and a direct route to becoming a U.S. citizen."......."
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2577134

Why is this happening?

[CID1990]

If I had said "defeated" would that have spared me the lecture on asymmetrical warfare?

No because, again, you can't defeat them. It's whack-a-mole.


It wasn't a lecture. It's a statement of fact. I didn't take your Sun Tzu-esque, "know your enemy" statement as a lecture.

You tell me how we defeat Islamic extremists.

The same way Saddam and Khaddafy defeated them.

In fact they didn't defeat them- they never let them get off the ground.

[Ibanez]

No because, again, you can't defeat them. It's whack-a-mole.


It wasn't a lecture. It's a statement of fact. I didn't take your Sun Tzu-esque, "know your enemy" statement as a lecture.

You tell me how we defeat Islamic extremists.

The same way Saddam and Khaddafy defeated them.

In fact they didn't defeat them- they never let them get off the ground.

The only way to "defeat" them is to turn that sandbox into a sheet of glass.

[CID1990]

The same way Saddam and Khaddafy defeated them.

In fact they didn't defeat them- they never let them get off the ground.

The only way to "defeat" them is to turn that sandbox into a sheet of glass.

Saddam and Khaddafy didn't do that, and they had few murder monkey problems.

You mean to ask how do we defeat them when we don't want to hurt any feelings. Then you'd be correct that we can't defeat Islamic terrorism. WE can't defeat them - but they CAN be defeated.

But the first step either way is to get past the pussy footing around on what to call them.

[Ibanez]

The only way to "defeat" them is to turn that sandbox into a sheet of glass.

Saddam and Khaddafy didn't do that, and they had few murder monkey problems.

You mean to ask how do we defeat them when we don't want to hurt any feelings. Then you'd be correct that we can't defeat Islamic terrorism. WE can't defeat them - but they CAN be defeated.

But the first step either way is to get past the pussy footing around on what to call them.

How do you propose we defeat an idea?

[CID1990]

Saddam and Khaddafy didn't do that, and they had few murder monkey problems.

You mean to ask how do we defeat them when we don't want to hurt any feelings. Then you'd be correct that we can't defeat Islamic terrorism. WE can't defeat them - but they CAN be defeated.

But the first step either way is to get past the pussy footing around on what to call them.

How do you propose we defeat an idea?

How did Saddam and Khaddafy do it?

[Ibanez]

How do you propose we defeat an idea?

How did Saddam and Khaddafy do it?

Chemical warfare and overall genocide?

[CID1990]

How did Saddam and Khaddafy do it?

Chemical warfare and overall genocide?

So you CAN defeat an idea, apparently.

[Ibanez]

Chemical warfare and overall genocide?

So you CAN defeat an idea, apparently.

I didn't say that. I just took a shot at two methods those men used to murder thousands. That didn't defeat the idea of jihad against the West. The WTC bombing in 1993 was less than 2 years after the 1991 uprising against Saddam. Then the various embassy bombings in the mid-late 90s, the USS Cole, 9/11, etc..

So again, how was the idea defeated? You said they were. Prove it.

[YoUDeeMan]

Chemical warfare and overall genocide?

So you CAN defeat an idea, apparently.

[YoUDeeMan]

So you CAN defeat an idea, apparently.

I didn't say that. I just took a shot at two methods those men used to murder thousands. That didn't defeat the idea of jihad against the West. The WTC bombing in 1993 was less than 2 years after the 1991 uprising against Saddam. Then the various embassy bombings in the mid-late 90s, the USS Cole, 9/11, etc..

So again, how was the idea defeated? You said they were. Prove it.

You eradicate the idea by exterminating (oh, without prejudice) the people that keep passing along the idea.

[Ibanez]

I didn't say that. I just took a shot at two methods those men used to murder thousands. That didn't defeat the idea of jihad against the West. The WTC bombing in 1993 was less than 2 years after the 1991 uprising against Saddam. Then the various embassy bombings in the mid-late 90s, the USS Cole, 9/11, etc..

So again, how was the idea defeated? You said they were. Prove it.

You eradicate the idea by exterminating (oh, without prejudice) the people that keep passing along the idea.

That doesn't really defeat it. That controls the growth/spread,at best.