Please, Help Me Find The Battery

[andy7171]

Mothe Fucking etad!

[ASUG8]

Mothe Fucking etad!

[JohnStOnge]

Why do I need that guy when I can see it all clear as day on video? There is no "throwing to the ground". Not even remotely close. That discredits him immediately. God you're dense. You have to be trolling again, right? Nobody is as dumb as you are trying to play. Good job man. You got me. You win this troll.

You cannot see on the videos as clearly and comprehensively as he could see standing right next to her actually being there. What's "dumb" is to keep discounting the fact that there is contemporaneous...or if you prefer immediately after the fact...audio showing that the guy saw it as almost throwing her to the ground at the time. That completely nixes any argument that he made it up later.

It also pretty much nixes any argument that the two of them go together and conspired to make up the story. She saw it as almost being thrown to the ground when it happened and another person close by saw it in the same way. The audio of the event absolutely confirms that. And what you're looking at is one video where there are time gaps and another where you don't have a full view.

[JohnStOnge]

And JSO, you should check out modern medicine...an old girlfriend of mine would bruise if you looked at her sideways. Another girl on one sailboat I used to sail on bruised if the wind hit her.

Plenty of medical reasons for a person to bruise easily.

But, in the end, the chick is looking for fame...and is probably being paid to hound Trump.

She is the equivalent of the girl suing McDonald's for the cup of coffee...a gold digging whore.

The "chick" was working for Breitbart, which is pro Trump. And we are talking about a battery charge. As I said: It doesn't take much. I can't believe you would seriously argue that it's OK if he grabbed her hard enough to bruise her because some people bruise easily.

And BTW if you take the law literally there is absolutely no doubt that he violated it. Literally I mean. That is unless you say that she's lying about it being unwanted touching. It was cleary intentional and it was cleary him "touching" her. In fact it was him grabbing her. And that inconvenient audio pretty strongly suggests that it was unwanted.

[Ursus A. Horribilis]

Why do I need that guy when I can see it all clear as day on video? There is no "throwing to the ground". Not even remotely close. That discredits him immediately. God you're dense. You have to be trolling again, right? Nobody is as dumb as you are trying to play. Good job man. You got me. You win this troll.

You cannot see on the videos as clearly and comprehensively as he could see standing right next to her actually being there. What's "dumb" is to keep discounting the fact that there is contemporaneous...or if you prefer immediately after the fact...audio showing that the guy saw it as almost throwing her to the ground at the time. That completely nixes any argument that he made it up later.

It also pretty much nixes any argument that the two of them go together and conspired to make up the story. She saw it as almost being thrown to the ground when it happened and another person close by saw it in the same way. The audio of the event absolutely confirms that. And what you're looking at is one video where there are time gaps and another where you don't have a full view.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBA-01wn_fk[/youtube]

[DSUrocks07]

someone needs to help this woman find her batteries.