They forgot to mention that the GOP, as a whole, doesn't like him either. Nor do his colleagues.His challenge: Remaining well-liked in a GOP that, at least for now, is under the control of a man Cruz has indicated that he does not respect.
Have you ever read it?Skjellyfetti wrote:Hmm. Princeton graduate with honors.CitadelGrad wrote: Michelle's senior thesis at Princeton is in the public domain and was written in a language vaguely resembling English.
Vs.
University of Ljubljana dropout.
I'll tell you what she accomplished. She got my kids in shape. Due to her revamping of public school lunches, they only get about 150 calories in the middle of the day. Fuck yeah.CitadelGrad wrote:Have you ever read it?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Hmm. Princeton graduate with honors.
Vs.
University of Ljubljana dropout.
She got into Princeton because she's a negro. She was almost certainly graded generously because she's a negro. What has she actually accomplished other than being a negro?
Just read the first several pages. What's your problem with it? It's well written. Grammar and format are on point.CitadelGrad wrote:Have you ever read it?Skjellyfetti wrote:
Hmm. Princeton graduate with honors.
Vs.
University of Ljubljana dropout.
She got into Princeton because she's a negro. She was almost certainly graded generously because she's a negro. What has she actually accomplished other than being a negro?
Which is funny because we all know that the only purpose of the whole "pledge of loyalty" was to force Trump to potentially put his foot in his mouth once someone else (Cruz Bush or Rubio) got the nod.Ibanez wrote:I thought it was interesting to point out that all the GOP candidates made a pledge to support the nominee, whoever it was and now...that it's Trump, most of them have not. What a bunch of empty suits. Proof that those vows are meaningless.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/20/politics/ ... index.html
They forgot to mention that the GOP, as a whole, doesn't like him either. Nor do his colleagues.His challenge: Remaining well-liked in a GOP that, at least for now, is under the control of a man Boobs has indicated that he does not respect.
When I click on the WSJ link I get the 1st paragraph followed by:Ibanez wrote:not true. i don't have a WSJ subscription.BDKJMU wrote:
Yep. For those that link doesn't work for without a WSJ subscription:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-bes ... 00739.html
CitadelGrad wrote: Have you ever read it?
She got into Princeton because she's a negro. She was almost certainly graded generously because she's a negro. What has she actually accomplished other than being a negro?
-Learned 5 languagesSkjellyfetti wrote:CitadelGrad wrote: Have you ever read it?
She got into Princeton because she's a negro. She was almost certainly graded generously because she's a negro. What has she actually accomplished other than being a negro?
No. I haven't read it. I have better things to do.
But, I have read and written plenty of undergraduate theses... and, they're nothing too impressive. An impressive undergraduate thesis is the exception rather than the rule.
But, the point is - you wanted to compare Michelle Obama to Melania.
What exactly has Melania ever accomplished?
"aircraft-carrier sized ass" and I'm "the master of substance-free, dismissive, ad hominem remarks".Ivytalk wrote:Oh shut up, you self-righteous doofus. You're the master of substance-free, dismissive, ad hominem remarks. Go play with your broken-down truck.houndawg wrote:
Hate just oozing...
it can't be any fun going through life filled with that kind of bile....sooner or you're just going to have to accept the fact that the nation elected a black man President, twice, and would elect him again if it could be done.
Its a tempest in a teapot but the irony is so delicious; the memesters are fully employed and working overtime on "the irony of an immigrant with an thick accent regurgitating a paper written by a black woman to a rapt audience that hates immigrants, blacks, and women", is just too fabulous to pass up.CID1990 wrote:I'm enjoying plagiarismgate
Suddenly the Democrats are all about integrity and honesty
A military coup is obviously highly unlikely (I'd never say never anymore), but as a veteran who served six years entirely during the Clinton administration, I can tell you that the probability of a coup would be much higher under Hillary Clinton than it would be under Donald Trump.BDKJMU wrote:The left is already getting nervous about the possibility Trump could win. Op Ed in LA Times calling for a military coup against a President Trump.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/
I don't know what to tell you. I didn't have trouble reading it w/o a subscription.BDKJMU wrote:When I click on the WSJ link I get the 1st paragraph followed by:Ibanez wrote: not true. i don't have a WSJ subscription.
"To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In"
It only locks out people who complain about others getting free shit.Ibanez wrote:I don't know what to tell you. I didn't have trouble reading it w/o a subscription.BDKJMU wrote:
When I click on the WSJ link I get the 1st paragraph followed by:
"To Read the Full Story, Subscribe or Sign In"
They've got BDKs IP logged.93henfan wrote:It only locks out people who complain about others getting free shit.Ibanez wrote: I don't know what to tell you. I didn't have trouble reading it w/o a subscription.
And, Republicans used to be about reasonable balanced budgets, reasonable laws for small businesses, and sound reasoning in general.CID1990 wrote:I'm enjoying plagiarismgate
Suddenly the Democrats are all about integrity and honesty
It may be that Trump has this planned out. Why endorse now when it's expected? Instead endorse later during a slow news cycle or when Hillary has some good news. Throws her campaign and message off. Everybody is thinking the traditional campaign and that's not Trump.93henfan wrote:Eh, Trump hurt his feelings with the Lyin' Ted talk. No surprise. Cruz is a douche who only cares about himself; willing to cut off his nose to spite his face. His lack of an endorsement changes nothing. A Cruz endorsement wouldn't suddenly make JSO or Ivy or other Hillary supporters vote for Trump.
I do not like him Sam I Am.HI54UNI wrote:It may be that Trump has this planned out. Why endorse now when it's expected? Instead endorse later during a slow news cycle or when Hillary has some good news. Throws her campaign and message off. Everybody is thinking the traditional campaign and that's not Trump.93henfan wrote:Eh, Trump hurt his feelings with the Lyin' Ted talk. No surprise. Cruz is a douche who only cares about himself; willing to cut off his nose to spite his face. His lack of an endorsement changes nothing. A Cruz endorsement wouldn't suddenly make JSO or Ivy or other Hillary supporters vote for Trump.
Or I could be wrong and Cruz is a just a douchebag.
Any talk of a "party loyalty pledge" going forward will just be a crock of shit now.93henfan wrote:Eh, Trump hurt his feelings with the Lyin' Ted talk. No surprise. Boobs is a douche who only cares about himself; willing to cut off his nose to spite his face. His lack of an endorsement changes nothing. A Boobs endorsement wouldn't suddenly make JSO or Ivy or other Hillary supporters vote for Trump.
