Hilldog's high unfavorables

[CAA Flagship]

Meh. What did you expect when your candidate opens up the immigration debate by calling Team Brown rapists and murderers?

I hate defending Trump, but I don't mind defending the truth. Here is part of the original comments, along with a doubling down. I just don't see him degrading an entire race. I see him saying that rapists are among the people coming across the border.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaz1J0s-cL4[/youtube]

[YoUDeeMan]

Meh. What did you expect when your candidate opens up the immigration debate by calling Team Brown rapists and murderers?

I hate defending Trump, but I don't mind defending the truth. Here is part of the original comments, along with a doubling down. I just don't see him degrading an entire race. I see him saying that rapists are among the people coming across the border.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaz1J0s-cL4[/youtube]

Dammit, flaggy...why are you bringing reasoning skills into this?

You are clearly a racist!!!!

[BDKJMU]

Do you feel the same way about those employers that hire them in the first place? After all there would be a much smaller amount of illegal immigrants if not for those employers exploiting their cheap labor.

Yes.

Jail the employers...and if they get caught a second time, they can set up their next business in Mexico.

Black, White, Brown, Purple, Pink...I don't care. Well, hold on...unless those Purple people are JMU fans...they should apply for their own subdivision on another continent. Regardless...we are either a country with citizens, or we are not. If you are here illegally, or supporting someone who is here illegally, then get the fvck out.

[BDKJMU]

I am amazed that I am still amazed at how good the Teflon coating on the Clinton's really is. Lead story yesterday should be the new missing e-mails and the incredible number of Clinton Foundation donors getting meetings with Hillary, but the national network news instead decides to report on Trump's claims of her being physically unfit for office instead. They hint at the other story, but then actually don't even talk about it.

The "Clinton Cash" This is a huge scandal that is getting some MSM coverage, but not nearly what it would be if it was a conk..

"Many donors to Clinton Foundation met with her at State

WASHINGTON (AP) — More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It's an extraordinary proportion indicating her possible ethics challenges if elected president.

At least 85 of 154 people from private interests who met or had phone conversations scheduled with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity or pledged commitments to its international programs, according to a review of State Department calendars released so far to The Associated Press. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million. At least 40 donated more than $100,000 each, and 20 gave more than $1 million....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/many-donors- ... ction.html

[BDKJMU]

"New revelations show a nation for sale under Hillary Clinton

..........The Clinton Foundation...most fruitful program has been leveraging Clinton’s position in the State Department to enrich her family, friends and cronies.

It’s against federal law for charities to act in the interests of private business or individuals. Yet the Clinton Foundation secured high-paying gigs for its namesakes and helped for-profit corporations with family ties set up lucrative deals.

As it turns out, that’s probably the least corrupt part of the story.

It is becoming clear the foundation was a center of influence peddling. Rock stars. Soccer players. Conglomerates. Crown princes. All of them paid in. All of them expected access to the US government.

Want a seat on a government intelligence advisory board even though you have no relevant experience? The Clinton Foundation may be able to help.

Recently released emails prove the charity’s officials had sought access to State Department personnel while Hillary was in charge. Folks like the prince of Bahrain, who donated $32 million to the foundation, needed to get in touch.

An Associated Press investigation finds that more than half the private citizens who met or spoke with Clinton while she was secretary of state also happened to donate to her foundation. What are the odds?

It’s implausible that a majority of the 154 citizens — people who’d kicked in at least $156 million to her charity — would also happen to catch Clinton’s ear as she toiled away at State. It’s also worth remembering this list doesn’t even include officials from the 16 governments — many of them autocrats — who threw the foundation another $170 million.

Recently, the foundation announced it would ban donations from corporations and foreign countries if Hillary is elected president. The question is: If it’s a conflict of interest when Hillary will be president, why wasn’t it a problem when she was secretary of state?

Let’s also not forget that during Clinton’s tenure at State, she failed to disclose that regimes across the world were giving her charity hundreds of millions. Because she needed to hide this, she ended up sending 110 emails containing classified information — eight of which had “top secret” information, according to the FBI.

These days, Hillary brazenly goes on Jimmy Kimmel to clown around about her “boring” emails.

Well, if they’re so irrelevant, why was she hiding them from the Justice Department? If it’s no big deal, why did it take four years and a lawsuit against the State Department to gain access to her planning schedules? Why did she lie to the American people? Erase tens of thousands of emails? Set up a private server in the first place?

Hillary claims running the State Department gave her the experience and temperament necessary to be president. But if anything, it reminds us of the Clintons’ propensity for scandal and dishonesty. And if Clinton wins this year, she’ll become the most ethically compromised president in contemporary times. Perhaps ever."
http://nypost.com/2016/08/23/new-revela ... y-clinton/

[houndawg]

Good grief, what are you challenging JSO for his Drama Queen title?

There wouldn't be any illegals in the country if there weren't any work for them. You're soiling your panty shield over a problem that could be solved with a stroke of the pen overnight. Start throwing employers in jail and the "problem" vanishes tout suite. Don't go JSO on us, bro, it doesn't have to be like that....

I agree that we should jail the employers.

The union folks should be on board with that, but they have sold out their union members...and the union members have sold their souls to the Democratic party.

It is absolutely amazing that union people continue to vote for Dems while the Dems like Clinton spend their time focused on international conquest and personal enrichment rather than investing in our infrastructure.

But, your claim that the illegals would vanish if we arrest the employers is hyperbole. First of all, there's an underground, cash driven economy that would still bring in many illegals. Secondly, free education, free health care, anchor baby citizenship, and family ties to those already here is a HUGE draw for illegals.

We should revoke any citizenship for those who harbor illegals, including family members and those in the churches. We should also send packing the clowns who create sanctuary cities.

Open up immigration so that more people can come here. Talented people are needed. But we should not have an open door immigration policy, which is essentially what we have now.

Nannies for congresspeople.

[GannonFan]

Agreed, it's astounding how little care there is for ethics in politics, but it's really just a reflection of the day and how little people even value ethics in politics, let alone in general or in their own lives. Ethics ranks way low on the list of what people vote for these days, that's why Trump can be a candidate for one party and Clinton for another one. People care more about what party the candidate is from, how the person looks and acts while on tv, and their gender/race. After that, people tune out.

[GannonFan]

I agree that we should jail the employers.

The union folks should be on board with that, but they have sold out their union members...and the union members have sold their souls to the Democratic party.

It is absolutely amazing that union people continue to vote for Dems while the Dems like Clinton spend their time focused on international conquest and personal enrichment rather than investing in our infrastructure.

But, your claim that the illegals would vanish if we arrest the employers is hyperbole. First of all, there's an underground, cash driven economy that would still bring in many illegals. Secondly, free education, free health care, anchor baby citizenship, and family ties to those already here is a HUGE draw for illegals.

We should revoke any citizenship for those who harbor illegals, including family members and those in the churches. We should also send packing the clowns who create sanctuary cities.

Open up immigration so that more people can come here. Talented people are needed. But we should not have an open door immigration policy, which is essentially what we have now.

Nannies for congresspeople.

Not just Congress, Cabinet members need live-in domestic help too.

[BDKJMU]

Agreed, it's astounding how little care there is for ethics in politics, but it's really just a reflection of the day and how little people even value ethics in politics, let alone in general or in their own lives. Ethics ranks way low on the list of what people vote for these days, that's why Trump can be a candidate for one party and Clinton for another one. People care more about what party the candidate is from, how the person looks and acts while on tv, and their gender/race. After that, people tune out.

I would change that a little to:
-party
-looks on TV
-how well they read a speech written by someone else off a teleprompter & how they look doing it
-race/gender


As far as looks, when was the last time the US elected a fat ass? We might with Clinton..

[Wedgebuster]

I am amazed that I am still amazed at how good the Teflon coating on the Clinton's really is. Lead story yesterday should be the new missing e-mails and the incredible number of Clinton Foundation donors getting meetings with Hillary, but the national network news instead decides to report on Trump's claims of her being physically unfit for office instead. They hint at the other story, but then actually don't even talk about it.

Hen, its the boy (GOP) who cried "wolf" syndrome.

Nobody cares what the opposition says about the Clintons anymore, conspiracy theories etc regarding them have hit terminal velocity long ago. Partisan congressional hearings, impeachment attempts, and claims of a multitude of "improprieties" are largely falling on deaf ears to the point they are quite surely inoculated from further attacks even if there is actually substance. It is worn out shit, and almost entirely partisan.

As I stated months ago, Clinton could win this election even from jail, which will not happen no matter how bad the Drumphies want it to.

[89Hen]

I am amazed that I am still amazed at how good the Teflon coating on the Clinton's really is. Lead story yesterday should be the new missing e-mails and the incredible number of Clinton Foundation donors getting meetings with Hillary, but the national network news instead decides to report on Trump's claims of her being physically unfit for office instead. They hint at the other story, but then actually don't even talk about it.

Hen, its the boy (GOP) who cried "wolf" syndrome.

Nobody cares what the opposition says about the Clintons anymore, conspiracy theories etc regarding them have hit terminal velocity long ago. Partisan congressional hearings, impeachment attempts, and claims of a multitude of "improprieties" are largely falling on deaf ears to the point they are quite surely inoculated from further attacks even if there is actually substance. It is worn out shit, and almost entirely partisan.

I've got a new avatar for you.

[JohnStOnge]

[houndawg]

"New revelations show a nation for sale under Hillary Clinton

..........The Clinton Foundation...most fruitful program has been leveraging Clinton’s position in the State Department to enrich her family, friends and cronies.

It’s against federal law for charities to act in the interests of private business or individuals. Yet the Clinton Foundation secured high-paying gigs for its namesakes and helped for-profit corporations with family ties set up lucrative deals.

As it turns out, that’s probably the least corrupt part of the story.

It is becoming clear the foundation was a center of influence peddling. Rock stars. Soccer players. Conglomerates. Crown princes. All of them paid in. All of them expected access to the US government.

Want a seat on a government intelligence advisory board even though you have no relevant experience? The Clinton Foundation may be able to help.

Recently released emails prove the charity’s officials had sought access to State Department personnel while Hillary was in charge. Folks like the prince of Bahrain, who donated $32 million to the foundation, needed to get in touch.

An Associated Press investigation finds that more than half the private citizens who met or spoke with Clinton while she was secretary of state also happened to donate to her foundation. What are the odds?

It’s implausible that a majority of the 154 citizens — people who’d kicked in at least $156 million to her charity — would also happen to catch Clinton’s ear as she toiled away at State. It’s also worth remembering this list doesn’t even include officials from the 16 governments — many of them autocrats — who threw the foundation another $170 million.

Recently, the foundation announced it would ban donations from corporations and foreign countries if Hillary is elected president. The question is: If it’s a conflict of interest when Hillary will be president, why wasn’t it a problem when she was secretary of state?

Let’s also not forget that during Clinton’s tenure at State, she failed to disclose that regimes across the world were giving her charity hundreds of millions. Because she needed to hide this, she ended up sending 110 emails containing classified information — eight of which had “top secret” information, according to the FBI.

These days, Hillary brazenly goes on Jimmy Kimmel to clown around about her “boring” emails.

Well, if they’re so irrelevant, why was she hiding them from the Justice Department? If it’s no big deal, why did it take four years and a lawsuit against the State Department to gain access to her planning schedules? Why did she lie to the American people? Erase tens of thousands of emails? Set up a private server in the first place?

Hillary claims running the State Department gave her the experience and temperament necessary to be president. But if anything, it reminds us of the Clintons’ propensity for scandal and dishonesty. And if Clinton wins this year, she’ll become the most ethically compromised president in contemporary times. Perhaps ever."
http://nypost.com/2016/08/23/new-revela ... y-clinton/

Another challenger for JSO's Drama Queen of the Year.

SCOTUS says that money talks and that government is for sale to the highest bidder. Clinton's didn't make the rules, they're just playing by them, BDKLULESS.

And playing very well too....its no wonder the conks haven't laid a glove on them in 30+ years of trying.

[DSUrocks07]

JSO officially just jumped the shark.

This. This is the post where he can no longer be taken seriously in any political conversation ever again.

You can be against Trump.
You can believe that Trump losing would be good for the GOP establishment in the long run.

But this?



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

[93henfan]

Just a weak troll attempt.

Hey Rocks, I just saw that Tracy Morgan is coming back to Dover, where he performed his last show before his near-fatal accident. I think I'm gonna go. That dude is hilarious. Any advice on tickets? I've never gone to a show in the casino.

[kalm]

"New revelations show a nation for sale under Hillary Clinton

..........The Clinton Foundation...most fruitful program has been leveraging Clinton’s position in the State Department to enrich her family, friends and cronies.

It’s against federal law for charities to act in the interests of private business or individuals. Yet the Clinton Foundation secured high-paying gigs for its namesakes and helped for-profit corporations with family ties set up lucrative deals.

As it turns out, that’s probably the least corrupt part of the story.

It is becoming clear the foundation was a center of influence peddling. Rock stars. Soccer players. Conglomerates. Crown princes. All of them paid in. All of them expected access to the US government.

Want a seat on a government intelligence advisory board even though you have no relevant experience? The Clinton Foundation may be able to help.

Recently released emails prove the charity’s officials had sought access to State Department personnel while Hillary was in charge. Folks like the prince of Bahrain, who donated $32 million to the foundation, needed to get in touch.

An Associated Press investigation finds that more than half the private citizens who met or spoke with Clinton while she was secretary of state also happened to donate to her foundation. What are the odds?

It’s implausible that a majority of the 154 citizens — people who’d kicked in at least $156 million to her charity — would also happen to catch Clinton’s ear as she toiled away at State. It’s also worth remembering this list doesn’t even include officials from the 16 governments — many of them autocrats — who threw the foundation another $170 million.

Recently, the foundation announced it would ban donations from corporations and foreign countries if Hillary is elected president. The question is: If it’s a conflict of interest when Hillary will be president, why wasn’t it a problem when she was secretary of state?

Let’s also not forget that during Clinton’s tenure at State, she failed to disclose that regimes across the world were giving her charity hundreds of millions. Because she needed to hide this, she ended up sending 110 emails containing classified information — eight of which had “top secret” information, according to the FBI.

These days, Hillary brazenly goes on Jimmy Kimmel to clown around about her “boring” emails.

Well, if they’re so irrelevant, why was she hiding them from the Justice Department? If it’s no big deal, why did it take four years and a lawsuit against the State Department to gain access to her planning schedules? Why did she lie to the American people? Erase tens of thousands of emails? Set up a private server in the first place?

Hillary claims running the State Department gave her the experience and temperament necessary to be president. But if anything, it reminds us of the Clintons’ propensity for scandal and dishonesty. And if Clinton wins this year, she’ll become the most ethically compromised president in contemporary times. Perhaps ever."
http://nypost.com/2016/08/23/new-revela ... y-clinton/

Another challenger for JSO's Drama Queen of the Year.

SCOTUS says that money talks and that government is for sale to the highest bidder. Clinton's didn't make the rules, they're just playing by them, BDKLULESS.

And playing very well too....its no wonder the conks haven't laid a glove on them in 30+ years of trying.

This. Gotta love the new found concern over corruption and ethics.

[SDHornet]

Now I get it. If the Teflon gets a scratch, guys like Hornet and Jelly are there to apply another coat.

Naw I can't stand hilldog and I agree the press is nowhere near as critical of her as they were for W (hell, she's just like him in a lot of ways). If it wasn't for the ineptitude of the conks and Trump, they would be bludgeoning hilldog to death with a multitude of scandals. Instead we have Trump constantly putting his foot in his mouth which provides for an easy distraction for the biased press.

[SDHornet]

That's because beefing up and enforcing border security (which was part of the deal) was never done. And that is why securing the border is an essential part of any immigration reform.

And on your second point, yes those older immigrants are the ones who will be having their jobs taken by this current/next wave of immigrants. They have every reason to support immigration reform, so conks missed on a yuge opportunity to gain lee way with Team Brown on that one. Imagine what conks would be able to throw in the face of donks this election cycle if the conk congress would have gotten a reasonable immigration reform bill on Obama's desk.

And Team Brown being racist? Ha. Minorities can't be racists, only whites. Where have you been?

My White privilege is preventing me from seeing the fine print in my dictionary that is written, oddly enough, in black and white.

As far as the border security goes...yeah, we need to increase security...build a wall. But, you saw how the leeches reacted to that, didn't you?

The problem is not the wall, or whatever security is provided...the problem is the feeling of entitlement of, and lack of action taken against, the people here who are helping the illegals come over. Try to enforce any existing regulations and you are called a racist...not because the term, "racist" is accurate (it isn't), but because it is an effective term to get people frothing at the mouth when used in the presence of low information, anarchist, race first (is that better?) ass clowns.

It just takes a strong willed leader to overcome this. Trump is talking a big game...not that it matters, he ain't gonna win.

Face it, Team Brown, for the most part, is putting race first. THEY are identifying themselves as a unified front of color. They aren't saying, "Hey, I am an American who supports other Americans"...they are saying, "I am a BROWN person supporting other BROWN people."

That is racist.

Yup. Team Brown baby.

[SDHornet]

Agreed, it's astounding how little care there is for ethics in politics, but it's really just a reflection of the day and how little people even value ethics in politics, let alone in general or in their own lives. Ethics ranks way low on the list of what people vote for these days, that's why Trump can be a candidate for one party and Clinton for another one. People care more about what party the candidate is from, how the person looks and acts while on tv, and their gender/race. After that, people tune out.

[SDHornet]

Meh. What did you expect when your candidate opens up the immigration debate by calling Team Brown rapists and murderers?

I hate defending Trump, but I don't mind defending the truth. Here is part of the original comments, along with a doubling down. I just don't see him degrading an entire race. I see him saying that rapists are among the people coming across the border.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaz1J0s-cL4[/youtube]

I posted this gem earlier. Thanks for paying attention:

He didn't, but this election cycle exemplifies that perception is reality and unfortunately that is all that matters in today's society.

[Chizzang]

Hilary Clinton will "Out Political" anybody...
and were she named Dick Cheney she would be a beloved character of mythic fame and glory

As much as i despise her (and I truly do think she belongs in JAIL)
I have to laugh that Conservatives hate her so much
and are quoting all the same lines Liberals said about Cheney 10 years ago

Yeah - she's corrupt - and damn good at it
and it sucks
The Republicans were smart enough to not try and put Cheney in the WHITE HOUSE
Becasue he would have been gutted just like Hilary is now

[Ibanez]

Hilary Clinton will "Out Political" anybody...
and were she named Dick Cheney she would be a beloved character of mythic fame and glory

As much as i despise her (and I truly do think she belongs in JAIL)
I have to laugh that Conservatives hate her so much
and are quoting all the same lines Liberals said about Cheney 10 years ago

Yeah - she's corrupt - and damn good at it
and it sucks
The Republicans were smart enough to not try and put Cheney in the WHITE HOUSE
Becasue he would have been gutted just like Hilary is now

Cyborgs aren't naturalized citizens, dummy.

[CAA Flagship]

I hate defending Trump, but I don't mind defending the truth. Here is part of the original comments, along with a doubling down. I just don't see him degrading an entire race. I see him saying that rapists are among the people coming across the border.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaz1J0s-cL4[/youtube]

I posted this gem earlier. Thanks for paying attention:

He didn't, but this election cycle exemplifies that perception is reality and unfortunately that is all that matters in today's society.

That still does not explain your choice of words that mimic biased people.

[DSUrocks07]

Just a weak troll attempt.

Hey Rocks, I just saw that Tracy Morgan is coming back to Dover, where he performed his last show before his near-fatal accident. I think I'm gonna go. That dude is hilarious. Any advice on tickets? I've never gone to a show in the casino.

1) Put out for the best seats, Matre'd(sic)1, front few rows, right in front of the stage.

2)Arrive early, and get in line about 35-45 minutes prior to the doors opening. Seats arent assigned, only sections, so its first come, first serve.

3)If you decide to valet park, go to the Casino side, its more of a walk, but equal to any normal parking space, plus its a larger area so you're more likely to get in quicker, plus 75% of attendees go into the Casino after the show anyways to the bars, restaurants or to play a bit.

4) Continuing on the last part, don't plan on immediately leaving after the show if you do Valet. We've had issues with having enough drivers due to "budget restrictions" so if you do you'll probably end up waiting 30-40 mins for your vehicle anyways.

5) I since I work overnight shift so I'll be at the Concierge Desk after 11pm that night.

Im glad to see him returning, especially after the accident, Im sure he'll be taking the same stretch of the Turnpike back to NY after so I can imagine it will be difficult for him. One thing that sucks is that since I dont work the 3-11 shifts anymore I barely get any chance to interact with any performers. Although I was lucky enough to chat with Air Supply and their tour manager for a couple minutes after their show.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

[89Hen]

If it wasn't for the ineptitude of the conks and Trump, they would be bludgeoning hilldog to death with a multitude of scandals.

I completely disagree. Have you seen the hearings regarding the e-mails? They couldn't be any more poignant, level-headed or clear against Hillary. Yet NOBODY cares.