Colin Kaepernick

[CAA Flagship]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZwnpNW3qrY[/youtube]

[GannonFan]

I loved Hoosiers - on my personal top 10 list.

[BDKJMU]

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... nal-anthem





6.93


Still need more time.

From a guy who has an (I'm assuming) multi year, 8 figure contract..

I heard a handful of other athletes cited, all black, mostly in the NBA.

My bad. Make that 9 figures- I read 6 years/114 million.

[BDKJMU]

I disagree with Hildacunt. So am I am terrible person for hoping Hilacunt fooking dies of natural causes?

No.

I agree with Vidav. Wishing harm on someone because you disagree with their politics seems emotionally immature. I'm not sure what's gained by it?

Uh, in my example that would mean Hillary wouldn't be POTUS. That would be A LOT gained there..

[BDKJMU]

I disagree with Hildacunt. So am I am terrible person for hoping Hilacunt fooking dies of natural causes?

Natural causes?
You mean by earthquake, lightning strike, or fatigue of a small part in her plane's engine?

Well, I'd settle for any cause at this point..

[kalm]

No.

I agree with Vidav. Wishing harm on someone because you disagree with their politics seems emotionally immature. I'm not sure what's gained by it?

Uh, in my example that would mean Hillary wouldn't be POTUS. That would be A LOT gained there..

I'm talking about a real world scenario where your thinking doesn't actually make it happen. What's gained by thinking like that? Does it make you feel better? Satisfied?

[Ibanez]

No.

I agree with Vidav. Wishing harm on someone because you disagree with their politics seems emotionally immature. I'm not sure what's gained by it?

Uh, in my example that would mean Hillary wouldn't be POTUS. That would be A LOT gained there..

The point is that it's immature/childish to wish harm on someone just because you have a difference of opinion.


That person likes Bush. I hate Bush. I hope they get ass cancer and die!

[Ibanez]

Uh, in my example that would mean Hillary wouldn't be POTUS. That would be A LOT gained there..

I'm talking about a real world scenario where your thinking doesn't actually make it happen. What's gained by thinking like that? Does it make you feel better? Satisfied?

Makes him feel like a man.

[Grizalltheway]

Uh, in my example that would mean Hillary wouldn't be POTUS. That would be A LOT gained there..

That person likes Bush. I hate Bush. I hope they get ass cancer and die!

Dback is the militant gay around here, thank you very much.

[AZGrizFan]

[GannonFan]

Uh, in my example that would mean Hillary wouldn't be POTUS. That would be A LOT gained there..

The point is that it's immature/childish to wish harm on someone just because you have a difference of opinion.


That person likes Bush. I hate Bush. I hope they get ass cancer and die!

Of course it's childish, but those people should be allowed the freedom to express that.

[CAA Flagship]

Uh, in my example that would mean Hillary wouldn't be POTUS. That would be A LOT gained there..

The point is that it's immature/childish to wish harm on someone just because you have a difference of opinion.


That person likes Bush. I hate Bush. I hope they get ass cancer and die!

Difference of opinion? Is that what you see as the cause of the outrage?
Nobody gives a rat's ass as to WHY he is not standing. It's the fact that he is not standing.

[GrizFanStuckInUtah]

I only dislike the white part of him for his views.....if I disliked the black part, I'd be racist and oppressing him.

[kalm]

The point is that it's immature/childish to wish harm on someone just because you have a difference of opinion.


That person likes Bush. I hate Bush. I hope they get ass cancer and die!

Of course it's childish, but those people should be allowed the freedom to express that.

Is someone saying they shouldn't?

Or should someone else be allowed the freedom to criticize them for being childish?

It's a vicious cycle I tells ya!

[Ibanez]

Of course it's childish, but those people should be allowed the freedom to express that.

Is someone saying they shouldn't?

Or should someone else be allowed the freedom to criticize them for being childish?

It's a vicious cycle I tells ya!

That's the beauty of our society. You free to say nice, dumb, childish, intelligent things. But don't get pissy when you say something stupid and people use their freedom of speech to call you out.

[JohnStOnge]

I like how people get mad at CK and want him hurt, broke or dead over a political stance.

Yet they will vote for a lying murderer who put NATIONAL SECURITY at risk and has sold out the country they want her to lead. I love this stuff

I was going to try to stay away from the swerves into general election stuff in this thread but that's ridiculous. You don't know that HIllary Clinton put national security at risk with that e mail thing. And I really doubt that she did. She was sending stuff and receiving stuff using her personal e mail that she thought wasn't classified. Within government people disagree on what should and should not be classified all the time.

She's said she'd like to see all that stuff made public. I wish it would happen because I think that if the public saw what was actually in the e mails we're talking about the reaction would probably be "What's the big deal?"

[Ivytalk]

I like how people get mad at CK and want him hurt, broke or dead over a political stance.

Yet they will vote for a lying murderer who put NATIONAL SECURITY at risk and has sold out the country they want her to lead. I love this stuff

I was going to try to stay away from the swerves into general election stuff in this thread but that's ridiculous. You don't know that HIllary Clinton put national security at risk with that e mail thing. And I really doubt that she did. She was sending stuff and receiving stuff using her personal e mail that she thought wasn't classified. Within government people disagree on what should and should not be classified all the time.

She's said she'd like to see all that stuff made public. I wish it would happen because I think that if the public saw what was actually in the e mails we're talking about the reaction would probably be "What's the big deal?"

Now, you really have jumped the great white.

[DSUrocks07]

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

[CID1990]

I like how people get mad at CK and want him hurt, broke or dead over a political stance.

Yet they will vote for a lying murderer who put NATIONAL SECURITY at risk and has sold out the country they want her to lead. I love this stuff

I was going to try to stay away from the swerves into general election stuff in this thread but that's ridiculous. You don't know that HIllary Clinton put national security at risk with that e mail thing. And I really doubt that she did. She was sending stuff and receiving stuff using her personal e mail that she thought wasn't classified. Within government people disagree on what should and should not be classified all the time.

She's said she'd like to see all that stuff made public. I wish it would happen because I think that if the public saw what was actually in the e mails we're talking about the reaction would probably be "What's the big deal?"

Again, Mr. Carville, wrong.

She did expose classified. It was a big deal. There was SCI in there, including methods (imaging) and assets. Agencies NEVER disagree on those.

And, she knew.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[houndawg]

I was going to try to stay away from the swerves into general election stuff in this thread but that's ridiculous. You don't know that HIllary Clinton put national security at risk with that e mail thing. And I really doubt that she did. She was sending stuff and receiving stuff using her personal e mail that she thought wasn't classified. Within government people disagree on what should and should not be classified all the time.

She's said she'd like to see all that stuff made public. I wish it would happen because I think that if the public saw what was actually in the e mails we're talking about the reaction would probably be "What's the big deal?"

Again, Mr. Carville, wrong.

She did expose classified. It was a big deal. There was SCI in there, including methods (imaging) and assets. Agencies NEVER disagree on those.

And, she knew.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Meh. Maybe there was stuff she exposed, but the public has for thirty years now been watching conk investigation after conk investigation come up dry on her; to the point where its kind of routine to see her being investigated for allegedly this or that and....nothing. They have cried wolf too often and now nobody believes them when they may actually have something.

You almost feel sorry for them; chumped by the Clintons yet again while the Southern Strategy collapses on them like the WTC. Almost.

[CID1990]

Again, Mr. Carville, wrong.

She did expose classified. It was a big deal. There was SCI in there, including methods (imaging) and assets. Agencies NEVER disagree on those.

And, she knew.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Meh. Maybe there was stuff she exposed, but the public has for thirty years now been watching conk investigation after conk investigation come up dry on her; to the point where its kind of routine to see her being investigated for allegedly this or that and....nothing. They have cried wolf too often and now nobody believes them when they may actually have something.

You almost feel sorry for them; chumped by the Clintons yet again while the Southern Strategy collapses on them like the WTC. Almost.

she has chumped us all - you're ok with that... we get it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[houndawg]

Meh. Maybe there was stuff she exposed, but the public has for thirty years now been watching conk investigation after conk investigation come up dry on her; to the point where its kind of routine to see her being investigated for allegedly this or that and....nothing. They have cried wolf too often and now nobody believes them when they may actually have something.

You almost feel sorry for them; chumped by the Clintons yet again while the Southern Strategy collapses on them like the WTC. Almost.

she has chumped us all - you're ok with that... we get it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Weak.

[AZGrizFan]

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Ah, the finest America has to offer.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[CAA Flagship]

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Ah, the finest America has to offer.....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No joke. Scumbags.

[houndawg]

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

L to R: ALPACAJIZZ, Cuck, BDKHD....... conks.