http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-t ... 3Y2NQ?il=0U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Friday said he was considering imposing a lifetime ban on U.S. military procurement officials going to work for defense contractors, a move that could dramatically reshape the defense industry.
93henfan wrote:This has about 0.000000000000693 % chance of happening, btw.
Thanks for the tip-off, Flaggy.
Bigly!Ivytalk wrote:Trump in the booth at Army Navy. He's behaving himself.
At least he's adding the phrase "considering" in front of all the new crap he blowing out of his ass93henfan wrote:WHOA, WHOA, WHOA!!! THIS IS CRAZY TALK!!!
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-t ... 3Y2NQ?il=0U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on Friday said he was considering imposing a lifetime ban on U.S. military procurement officials going to work for defense contractors, a move that could dramatically reshape the defense industry.
93henfan wrote:This has about 0.000000000000693 % chance of happening, btw.
Thanks for the tip-off, Flaggy.
Sounds like someone else we know.JohnStOnge wrote:He's completely full of **** pretty much every time he opens his mouth. That's a given.
Yeah but the Chinks and Camel Jockeys don't realize that yet. They are shitting a brick.JohnStOnge wrote:He's completely full of shit pretty much every time he opens his mouth. That's a given.
No they're not. They know they've got a complete buffoon on their hands. A gift. They've got an American President who has no clue and who will be easy to make a fool of.CAA Flagship wrote:Yeah but the Chinks and Camel Jockeys don't realize that yet. They are shitting a brick.JohnStOnge wrote:He's completely full of **** pretty much every time he opens his mouth. That's a given.
Nope. There was an unexpected fumble on the field. Sudden change. And a new QB is coming in that they have no scouting report on.JohnStOnge wrote:No they're not. They know they've got a complete buffoon on their hands. A gift. They've got an American President who has no clue and who will be easy to make a fool of.CAA Flagship wrote: Yeah but the Chinks and Camel Jockeys don't realize that yet. They are shitting a brick.
He's an idiot and they know it. Yes, there is some danger associated with the fact that he's such an idiot that he's unpredictable. But he's got no clue. And he's the easiest kind. He's an idiot who thinks he's brilliant.CAA Flagship wrote:Nope. There was an unexpected fumble on the field. Sudden change. And a new QB is coming in that they have no scouting report on.JohnStOnge wrote:
No they're not. They know they've got a complete buffoon on their hands. A gift. They've got an American President who has no clue and who will be easy to make a fool of.
JohnStOnge wrote:He's an idiot and they know it. Yes, there is some danger associated with the fact that he's such an idiot that he's unpredictable. But he's got no clue. And he's the easiest kind. He's an idiot who thinks he's brilliant.CAA Flagship wrote: Nope. There was an unexpected fumble on the field. Sudden change. And a new QB is coming in that they have no scouting report on.
They do have a scouting report on him. And the scouting report is that he is an idiot.
I guess we should stop having a monarchy where the President makes all the laws, rules, etc.... I wonder if a bicameral Congress would work?JohnStOnge wrote:No they're not. They know they've got a complete buffoon on their hands. A gift. They've got an American President who has no clue and who will be easy to make a fool of.CAA Flagship wrote: Yeah but the Chinks and Camel Jockeys don't realize that yet. They are shitting a brick.
I say only do that if we have a third branch, say of judges or something, that can act as another check by making a determination if the laws passed by that bicameral Congress jibe with the Constitution. That could work.Ibanez wrote:I guess we should stop having a monarchy where the President makes all the laws, rules, etc.... I wonder if a bicameral Congress would work?JohnStOnge wrote:
No they're not. They know they've got a complete buffoon on their hands. A gift. They've got an American President who has no clue and who will be easy to make a fool of.
That's a good idea. You know what would really make that work? Make the judges lifetime appointee's who can't be removed from the bench easily. That could help free them from partisanship.GannonFan wrote:I say only do that if we have a third branch, say of judges or something, that can act as another check by making a determination if the laws passed by that bicameral Congress jibe with the Constitution. That could work.Ibanez wrote: I guess we should stop having a monarchy where the President makes all the laws, rules, etc.... I wonder if a bicameral Congress would work?
I bet that would work.Ibanez wrote:That's a good idea. You know what would really make that work? Make the judges lifetime appointee's who can't be removed from the bench easily. That could help free them from partisanship.GannonFan wrote:
I say only do that if we have a third branch, say of judges or something, that can act as another check by making a determination if the laws passed by that bicameral Congress jibe with the Constitution. That could work.
What the hell does a two-humped camel have to do with this, Mr. I Think I'm Smarter Than Everyone Else?Ibanez wrote:I guess we should stop having a monarchy where the President makes all the laws, rules, etc.... I wonder if a bicameral Congress would work?JohnStOnge wrote:
No they're not. They know they've got a complete buffoon on their hands. A gift. They've got an American President who has no clue and who will be easy to make a fool of.
It's worth a shot.kalm wrote:I bet that would work.Ibanez wrote: That's a good idea. You know what would really make that work? Make the judges lifetime appointee's who can't be removed from the bench easily. That could help free them from partisanship.
I don't accept your premise.93henfan wrote:What the hell does a two-humped camel have to do with this, Mr. I Think I'm Smarter Than Everyone Else?Ibanez wrote: I guess we should stop having a monarchy where the President makes all the laws, rules, etc.... I wonder if a bicameral Congress would work?
Ibanez wrote:It's worth a shot.kalm wrote:
I bet that would work.
Honestly, I'd like to see the US adopt something like the Prime Minister's questions that occurs in the UK.
