Planned parenthood polls well too and the article says the same would probably be true for the NRA.
Trump trails Obamacare...
You can really see the divide when they parse it out by party.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/pol ... cf18a0ea1d







Sanders would have brought out the donk base & hard left better than Kasich would have brought out the conk base & hard right. But Kasich, coming across as the saner pick, would have done better with the indys & moderates Yes the RCP averages in 2016, mid April-beginning of May, around 6-7 months before the election, had Sanders +3.3, but if they had both won the general, Sanders after months of months side by side comparison to Kasich would have come off as a little too nutty, crazy uncle like. Remember, Clinton was up on Trump by at least what Sanders was up on Kasich April-May 2016..Sanders/Kasich would have likely been close, but I think Kasich would have won...JohnStOnge wrote:I think that if each Party would have selected the candidate that would do best in a General election we would've had Sanders vs. Kasich and Sanders would've won. I tihnk Sanders would've blown Trump or C ruz out. I think Rubio would've been reasonably competitive against him. Kasich would've been a close call who maybe could've beaten Sanders, I think (though my bet would be Sanders). But I think both Parties pretty much tried to commit suicide and the Democrats succeeded.

I thought your point was that the GOP succeeded.JohnStOnge wrote:I think that if each Party would have selected the candidate that would do best in a General election we would've had Sanders vs. Kasich and Sanders would've won. I tihnk Sanders would've blown Trump or C ruz out. I think Rubio would've been reasonably competitive against him. Kasich would've been a close call who maybe could've beaten Sanders, I think (though my bet would be Sanders). But I think both Parties pretty much tried to commit suicide and the Democrats succeeded.